Evaluating the Efficacy of the Marburg Heart Score to Triage Patients Presenting With Chest Pain in an Emergency Department: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/6085679
Loïc Druilhe, Lucie Creusier, Jérémy Pasco, Julie Eloi, Virginie Furet, Eric Roupie, Richard Macrez
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy of the Marburg Heart Score to Triage Patients Presenting With Chest Pain in an Emergency Department: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.","authors":"Loïc Druilhe, Lucie Creusier, Jérémy Pasco, Julie Eloi, Virginie Furet, Eric Roupie, Richard Macrez","doi":"10.1155/emmi/6085679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Chest pain is a common complaint in emergency departments. Although most patients are admitted to emergency department intensive care, only 12% have acute coronary syndrome. An accurate, efficient score is needed to improve triage and prevent unnecessary referrals to emergency department intensive care. The Marburg Heart Score, validated to rule out acute coronary syndrome in primary care, is quick to administer and does not require test results. This study aims to assess whether the Marburg Heart Score is effective in a triage setting for patients presenting with chest pain in emergency departments. <b>Method:</b> This prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted with triage nurses in four hospitals in France between July 15, 2018, and May 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was the negative predictive value of the Marburg Heart Score ≤ 2 for ruling out acute coronary syndrome. Acute coronary syndrome diagnosis was made using medical record data combined with a diagnosis from the physician in charge. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1045 patients were included. For a cutoff score of ≤ 2, the negative predictive value for suspected acute coronary syndrome was 95.6% (95% CI [94.0-97.2]) and the area under the curve was 0.603 (95% CI [0.521-0.685]). There were 28 false negatives, two of which were due to the score being completed incorrectly. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study reveals that the Marburg Heart Score is an efficient tool to direct patients presenting with chest pain and MHS < 2 to a conventional ED bed. This could potentially optimize triage in the emergency department to prevent overloading the emergency department intensive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6085679"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/6085679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chest pain is a common complaint in emergency departments. Although most patients are admitted to emergency department intensive care, only 12% have acute coronary syndrome. An accurate, efficient score is needed to improve triage and prevent unnecessary referrals to emergency department intensive care. The Marburg Heart Score, validated to rule out acute coronary syndrome in primary care, is quick to administer and does not require test results. This study aims to assess whether the Marburg Heart Score is effective in a triage setting for patients presenting with chest pain in emergency departments. Method: This prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted with triage nurses in four hospitals in France between July 15, 2018, and May 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was the negative predictive value of the Marburg Heart Score ≤ 2 for ruling out acute coronary syndrome. Acute coronary syndrome diagnosis was made using medical record data combined with a diagnosis from the physician in charge. Results: A total of 1045 patients were included. For a cutoff score of ≤ 2, the negative predictive value for suspected acute coronary syndrome was 95.6% (95% CI [94.0-97.2]) and the area under the curve was 0.603 (95% CI [0.521-0.685]). There were 28 false negatives, two of which were due to the score being completed incorrectly. Conclusion: This study reveals that the Marburg Heart Score is an efficient tool to direct patients presenting with chest pain and MHS < 2 to a conventional ED bed. This could potentially optimize triage in the emergency department to prevent overloading the emergency department intensive care.

评价马尔堡心脏评分对急诊科胸痛患者分诊的疗效:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究
目的:胸痛是急诊科常见的主诉。虽然大多数患者被送进急诊科重症监护室,但只有12%的患者患有急性冠状动脉综合征。需要一个准确、有效的评分来改善分诊,防止不必要的转诊到急诊科重症监护室。马尔堡心脏评分被证实可以在初级保健中排除急性冠状动脉综合征,它可以快速实施,而且不需要测试结果。本研究旨在评估马尔堡心脏评分在急诊科胸痛患者的分诊设置中是否有效。方法:这项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究于2018年7月15日至2019年5月31日期间在法国四家医院的分诊护士中进行。主要终点为马尔堡心脏评分≤2对排除急性冠状动脉综合征的阴性预测值。急性冠状动脉综合征的诊断是根据病历资料和主治医生的诊断作出的。结果:共纳入1045例患者。截止评分≤2时,疑似急性冠脉综合征的阴性预测值为95.6% (95% CI[94.0 ~ 97.2]),曲线下面积为0.603 (95% CI[0.521 ~ 0.685])。有28个假阴性,其中两个是由于分数填写错误。结论:本研究表明马尔堡心脏评分是指导胸痛和MHS < 2患者到常规ED床就诊的有效工具。这可能会优化急诊科的分诊,以防止急诊科重症监护超负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信