Osman S. Turkoglu, Xiaofeng Wang, Jennifer Repella-Gordon, Susan E. Shoaf
{"title":"A Randomized Thorough QT Trial Using Concentration-QT Analysis to Evaluate the Effects of Centanafadine on Cardiac Repolarization","authors":"Osman S. Turkoglu, Xiaofeng Wang, Jennifer Repella-Gordon, Susan E. Shoaf","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Centanafadine is a norepinephrine/dopamine/serotonin reuptake inhibitor in development for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. This double-blind, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, 3-period crossover trial evaluated the effects of centanafadine (EB-1020) and its metabolite (EB-10601) on cardiac repolarization in 30 healthy adults (18-65 years). Dosing sequences included centanafadine sustained-release 800 mg (supratherapeutic) total daily dose, placebo, and moxifloxacin 400 mg. Electrocardiogram parameters and heart rate (HR) were assessed. The primary endpoint was placebo-corrected change from baseline QTc (ΔΔQTc), analyzed using concentration-QTc (C-QTc) analysis. The C-QTc slopes for centanafadine (−0.001 ms/[ng/mL]) and EB-10601 (−0.0003 ms/[ng/mL]) were not statistically significant. Assay sensitivity was confirmed by the statistically significant C-QTc slope for moxifloxacin (0.004 ms/[ng/mL]) and a 2-sided 90% confidence interval lower bound >5 milliseconds. No change from baseline in QTcF or placebo-corrected QTcF ≥10 milliseconds for centanafadine was observed at any postdose time point. No centanafadine-treated participants had QTcF increases of >30 milliseconds and no relevant PR/QRS interval or HR increases were observed. The predicted ΔΔQTcF values of centanafadine, EB-10601, and moxifloxacin at the geometric mean C<sub>max</sub> were −2.72, −1.59, and 11.75 milliseconds, respectively. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events or deaths were reported. Centanafadine was generally safe and well-tolerated, with no clinically meaningful effect on cardiac repolarization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 8","pages":"621-630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1545","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Centanafadine is a norepinephrine/dopamine/serotonin reuptake inhibitor in development for treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. This double-blind, placebo- and moxifloxacin-controlled, 3-period crossover trial evaluated the effects of centanafadine (EB-1020) and its metabolite (EB-10601) on cardiac repolarization in 30 healthy adults (18-65 years). Dosing sequences included centanafadine sustained-release 800 mg (supratherapeutic) total daily dose, placebo, and moxifloxacin 400 mg. Electrocardiogram parameters and heart rate (HR) were assessed. The primary endpoint was placebo-corrected change from baseline QTc (ΔΔQTc), analyzed using concentration-QTc (C-QTc) analysis. The C-QTc slopes for centanafadine (−0.001 ms/[ng/mL]) and EB-10601 (−0.0003 ms/[ng/mL]) were not statistically significant. Assay sensitivity was confirmed by the statistically significant C-QTc slope for moxifloxacin (0.004 ms/[ng/mL]) and a 2-sided 90% confidence interval lower bound >5 milliseconds. No change from baseline in QTcF or placebo-corrected QTcF ≥10 milliseconds for centanafadine was observed at any postdose time point. No centanafadine-treated participants had QTcF increases of >30 milliseconds and no relevant PR/QRS interval or HR increases were observed. The predicted ΔΔQTcF values of centanafadine, EB-10601, and moxifloxacin at the geometric mean Cmax were −2.72, −1.59, and 11.75 milliseconds, respectively. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events or deaths were reported. Centanafadine was generally safe and well-tolerated, with no clinically meaningful effect on cardiac repolarization.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.