Treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapies in Germany 2016-2022.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Julius L Katzmann, Claudia Grellmann, Beate Leppert, Irina Müller-Kozarez, Martin Schulz, Ulrich Laufs
{"title":"Treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapies in Germany 2016-2022.","authors":"Julius L Katzmann, Claudia Grellmann, Beate Leppert, Irina Müller-Kozarez, Martin Schulz, Ulrich Laufs","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02686-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the availability of effective LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering drugs, only a minority of patients achieves the guideline-recommended treatment targets. This analysis describes treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Health claims data were used to identify patients at high or very-high cardiovascular risk who received a LLT prescription 2016-2022. Treatment pathways and the time to switch or discontinue LLT were analysed for statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (BA), and PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 3,487,827 insured persons, 247,529 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequent first-line LLT were statins in 96.3%. Ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i were first-line LLT in only 0.9%, 0.061%, and 0.046%, respectively. Only few patients experienced a change in their treatment regimen following LLT initiation. Prescriptions of BA and PCSK9i were mainly second-, third-, or fourth-line add-on treatment. Termination of treatment with BA and PCSK9i was less frequent compared to statins and ezetimibe. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 1.45, 1.04, 0.60, and 2.45 years for statins, ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i, respectively, and the median time to switch therapy was 4.81 and 4.87 years for ezetimibe and PCSK9i, respectively (median not reached for statins and BA).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Changes in LLT were only observed in a minority of patients. BA and PCSK9i were switched more frequently than statins and ezetimibe. BA was discontinued earlier, and PCSK9i later than the other agents. Continued efforts to maintain long-term adherence and overcome therapeutic inertia are needed to realise the potential of available LLT with proven cardiovascular benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02686-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of effective LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering drugs, only a minority of patients achieves the guideline-recommended treatment targets. This analysis describes treatment pathways of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in Germany.

Methods: Health claims data were used to identify patients at high or very-high cardiovascular risk who received a LLT prescription 2016-2022. Treatment pathways and the time to switch or discontinue LLT were analysed for statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid (BA), and PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i).

Results: Out of 3,487,827 insured persons, 247,529 met the inclusion criteria. The most frequent first-line LLT were statins in 96.3%. Ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i were first-line LLT in only 0.9%, 0.061%, and 0.046%, respectively. Only few patients experienced a change in their treatment regimen following LLT initiation. Prescriptions of BA and PCSK9i were mainly second-, third-, or fourth-line add-on treatment. Termination of treatment with BA and PCSK9i was less frequent compared to statins and ezetimibe. The median time to treatment discontinuation was 1.45, 1.04, 0.60, and 2.45 years for statins, ezetimibe, BA, and PCSK9i, respectively, and the median time to switch therapy was 4.81 and 4.87 years for ezetimibe and PCSK9i, respectively (median not reached for statins and BA).

Conclusions: Changes in LLT were only observed in a minority of patients. BA and PCSK9i were switched more frequently than statins and ezetimibe. BA was discontinued earlier, and PCSK9i later than the other agents. Continued efforts to maintain long-term adherence and overcome therapeutic inertia are needed to realise the potential of available LLT with proven cardiovascular benefit.

2016-2022年德国降脂疗法的治疗途径
背景:尽管有有效的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL- c)降低药物,但只有少数患者达到指南推荐的治疗目标。本分析描述了德国降脂疗法(LLT)的治疗途径。方法:健康声明数据用于识别2016-2022年接受LLT处方的心血管风险高或极高的患者。分析了他汀类药物、依折麦比、苯乙甲酸(BA)和PCSK9抑制剂(PCSK9i)的治疗途径和切换或停止LLT的时间。结果:3487827名参保人员中,247529人符合纳入标准。他汀类药物是最常见的一线LLT,占96.3%。依zetimibe、BA和PCSK9i分别仅为0.9%、0.061%和0.046%的一线LLT。只有少数患者在LLT开始后经历了治疗方案的改变。BA和PCSK9i的处方主要为二线、三线或四线附加治疗。与他汀类药物和依折麦比相比,BA和PCSK9i治疗终止的频率更低。他汀类药物、依zetimibe、BA和PCSK9i的中位停药时间分别为1.45年、1.04年、0.60年和2.45年,依zetimibe和PCSK9i的中位转治疗时间分别为4.81年和4.87年(他汀类药物和BA的中位未达到)。结论:仅在少数患者中观察到LLT的变化。BA和PCSK9i的切换频率高于他汀类和依折麦布。BA停药较早,PCSK9i停药较晚。需要继续努力保持长期依从性并克服治疗惰性,以实现具有心血管益处的可用LLT的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信