Surgical task-sharing in Sierra Leone: barriers and enablers from provider and facilitator perspectives.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jurre van Kesteren, Mirte Langeveld, Thomas Ashley, Tairu Fofanah, Hendrik Jaap Bonjer, Hakon Angell Bolkan
{"title":"Surgical task-sharing in Sierra Leone: barriers and enablers from provider and facilitator perspectives.","authors":"Jurre van Kesteren, Mirte Langeveld, Thomas Ashley, Tairu Fofanah, Hendrik Jaap Bonjer, Hakon Angell Bolkan","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To mitigate the critical surgeon shortage in Sierra Leone, a surgical training programme was launched in 2011, training associate alinicians in surgery and obstetrics through task-sharing. While graduates of this programme now perform most surgeries outside the capital, they continue to face significant barriers to integration within the national health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with surgical providers (n=12) and facilitators (n=10) to identify barriers and enablers of surgical task-sharing in Sierra Leone's health system. Providers and facilitators were selected from three geographically diverse hospitals with varying healthcare worker densities and also included district medical officers and representatives from the Ministry of Health and United Nations Population Fund. Data were analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis, categorising themes into institutional, interpersonal, resource-related and sociocultural factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 barriers and 21 enablers to surgical task-sharing were identified. Associate clinicians play a critical role in surgical care in underserved regions, help alleviate physician burnout and foster teamwork. Increasing support from younger doctors and hospital administrators signals growing acceptance. Yet, challenges such as exclusion from the healthcare service scheme, inadequate compensation, lack of training accreditation, reliance on external funding, limited national engagement and medical protectionism contribute to demotivation and attrition. These findings highlight the indispensable role of associate clinicians while emphasising the need for systemic reforms to maximise the impact of task-sharing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Enhancing institutional support, implementing rigorous regulatory frameworks and expanding training opportunities for physicians within the surgical training programme are essential measures to optimise the benefits of task-sharing, sustain the provision of high-quality care and improve surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018512","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To mitigate the critical surgeon shortage in Sierra Leone, a surgical training programme was launched in 2011, training associate alinicians in surgery and obstetrics through task-sharing. While graduates of this programme now perform most surgeries outside the capital, they continue to face significant barriers to integration within the national health system.

Methods: We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with surgical providers (n=12) and facilitators (n=10) to identify barriers and enablers of surgical task-sharing in Sierra Leone's health system. Providers and facilitators were selected from three geographically diverse hospitals with varying healthcare worker densities and also included district medical officers and representatives from the Ministry of Health and United Nations Population Fund. Data were analysed using descriptive qualitative content analysis, categorising themes into institutional, interpersonal, resource-related and sociocultural factors.

Results: In total, 18 barriers and 21 enablers to surgical task-sharing were identified. Associate clinicians play a critical role in surgical care in underserved regions, help alleviate physician burnout and foster teamwork. Increasing support from younger doctors and hospital administrators signals growing acceptance. Yet, challenges such as exclusion from the healthcare service scheme, inadequate compensation, lack of training accreditation, reliance on external funding, limited national engagement and medical protectionism contribute to demotivation and attrition. These findings highlight the indispensable role of associate clinicians while emphasising the need for systemic reforms to maximise the impact of task-sharing.

Conclusions: Enhancing institutional support, implementing rigorous regulatory frameworks and expanding training opportunities for physicians within the surgical training programme are essential measures to optimise the benefits of task-sharing, sustain the provision of high-quality care and improve surgical outcomes.

塞拉利昂的外科手术任务分担:从提供者和促进者的角度看障碍和推动因素。
背景:为了缓解塞拉利昂严重的外科医生短缺问题,2011年启动了一项外科培训计划,通过任务分担对外科和产科助理医生进行培训。虽然该计划的毕业生现在在首都以外的地方进行大多数手术,但他们在融入国家卫生系统方面仍然面临重大障碍。方法:我们对手术提供者(n=12)和促进者(n=10)进行了22次半结构化访谈,以确定塞拉利昂卫生系统中手术任务分担的障碍和推动因素。提供者和协调员是从三家地理位置不同、保健工作者密度不同的医院中挑选出来的,还包括地区医务官员以及卫生部和联合国人口基金的代表。数据分析采用描述性定性内容分析,将主题分为制度因素、人际因素、资源相关因素和社会文化因素。结果:共确定了18个障碍和21个促进手术任务共享的因素。助理临床医生在服务不足地区的外科护理中发挥着关键作用,有助于减轻医生的职业倦怠和促进团队合作。越来越多的年轻医生和医院管理人员的支持表明越来越多的人接受。然而,诸如被排除在医疗保健服务计划之外、补偿不足、缺乏培训认证、依赖外部资金、国家参与有限以及医疗保护主义等挑战都导致了积极性下降和人员流失。这些发现突出了助理临床医生不可或缺的作用,同时强调需要进行系统改革,以最大限度地发挥任务分担的影响。结论:加强机构支持,实施严格的监管框架,并在外科培训计划中扩大医生的培训机会,是优化任务分担效益,维持提供高质量护理和改善手术结果的必要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信