{"title":"Breaking Barriers: Essential Reforms for a Competitive and Affordable Biosimilars Market.","authors":"Eric T Roberts, Jinoos Yazdany","doi":"10.1007/s11926-025-01192-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This update examines the current policy landscape for biosimilars, particularly those approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis. We review recent literature and recommend policies to align the biosimilars market with the goals of the Biologic Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). We examine updated evidence on biosimilar safety and effectiveness, recent FDA guidance on interchangeability, and challenges posed by anti-competitive behaviors and government regulations. Additionally, we analyze financial incentives and market dynamics affecting biosimilar adoption and competition.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Building on the extensive body of RCT data demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars, real-world evidence from North America and Europe now confirms these findings, including in patients who switched therapies. Increased biosimilar prescribing will depend on disseminating safety data and strategies to enhance patient-physician communication. The FDA updated its interchangeability guidance to no longer require large clinical studies, citing updated understanding of safety data; this may facilitate more direct price-based competition. Congress and the Federal Trade Commission need to address anticompetitive behaviors including patent law loopholes, the role of PBMs in inflating drug prices, vertical integration of healthcare conglomerates, and changes to funding for government agencies charged with reviewing biosimilar drugs. Medicare reimbursement rates and the 340B program still unfairly incentivize use of bio-originator products. There are many barriers to achieving the goals of the BPCIA. With necessary changes, the U.S. can realize the goal of a competitive and sustainable biosimilar market that gradually reduces total drug expenditures and out-of-pocket costs over time without stifling innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10761,"journal":{"name":"Current Rheumatology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Rheumatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-025-01192-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This update examines the current policy landscape for biosimilars, particularly those approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis. We review recent literature and recommend policies to align the biosimilars market with the goals of the Biologic Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). We examine updated evidence on biosimilar safety and effectiveness, recent FDA guidance on interchangeability, and challenges posed by anti-competitive behaviors and government regulations. Additionally, we analyze financial incentives and market dynamics affecting biosimilar adoption and competition.
Recent findings: Building on the extensive body of RCT data demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars, real-world evidence from North America and Europe now confirms these findings, including in patients who switched therapies. Increased biosimilar prescribing will depend on disseminating safety data and strategies to enhance patient-physician communication. The FDA updated its interchangeability guidance to no longer require large clinical studies, citing updated understanding of safety data; this may facilitate more direct price-based competition. Congress and the Federal Trade Commission need to address anticompetitive behaviors including patent law loopholes, the role of PBMs in inflating drug prices, vertical integration of healthcare conglomerates, and changes to funding for government agencies charged with reviewing biosimilar drugs. Medicare reimbursement rates and the 340B program still unfairly incentivize use of bio-originator products. There are many barriers to achieving the goals of the BPCIA. With necessary changes, the U.S. can realize the goal of a competitive and sustainable biosimilar market that gradually reduces total drug expenditures and out-of-pocket costs over time without stifling innovation.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in the field of rheumatology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of rheumatologic conditions.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas such as the many forms of arthritis, osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.