Breaking Barriers: Essential Reforms for a Competitive and Affordable Biosimilars Market.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Eric T Roberts, Jinoos Yazdany
{"title":"Breaking Barriers: Essential Reforms for a Competitive and Affordable Biosimilars Market.","authors":"Eric T Roberts, Jinoos Yazdany","doi":"10.1007/s11926-025-01192-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This update examines the current policy landscape for biosimilars, particularly those approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis. We review recent literature and recommend policies to align the biosimilars market with the goals of the Biologic Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). We examine updated evidence on biosimilar safety and effectiveness, recent FDA guidance on interchangeability, and challenges posed by anti-competitive behaviors and government regulations. Additionally, we analyze financial incentives and market dynamics affecting biosimilar adoption and competition.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Building on the extensive body of RCT data demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars, real-world evidence from North America and Europe now confirms these findings, including in patients who switched therapies. Increased biosimilar prescribing will depend on disseminating safety data and strategies to enhance patient-physician communication. The FDA updated its interchangeability guidance to no longer require large clinical studies, citing updated understanding of safety data; this may facilitate more direct price-based competition. Congress and the Federal Trade Commission need to address anticompetitive behaviors including patent law loopholes, the role of PBMs in inflating drug prices, vertical integration of healthcare conglomerates, and changes to funding for government agencies charged with reviewing biosimilar drugs. Medicare reimbursement rates and the 340B program still unfairly incentivize use of bio-originator products. There are many barriers to achieving the goals of the BPCIA. With necessary changes, the U.S. can realize the goal of a competitive and sustainable biosimilar market that gradually reduces total drug expenditures and out-of-pocket costs over time without stifling innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10761,"journal":{"name":"Current Rheumatology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Rheumatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-025-01192-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This update examines the current policy landscape for biosimilars, particularly those approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis. We review recent literature and recommend policies to align the biosimilars market with the goals of the Biologic Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). We examine updated evidence on biosimilar safety and effectiveness, recent FDA guidance on interchangeability, and challenges posed by anti-competitive behaviors and government regulations. Additionally, we analyze financial incentives and market dynamics affecting biosimilar adoption and competition.

Recent findings: Building on the extensive body of RCT data demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars, real-world evidence from North America and Europe now confirms these findings, including in patients who switched therapies. Increased biosimilar prescribing will depend on disseminating safety data and strategies to enhance patient-physician communication. The FDA updated its interchangeability guidance to no longer require large clinical studies, citing updated understanding of safety data; this may facilitate more direct price-based competition. Congress and the Federal Trade Commission need to address anticompetitive behaviors including patent law loopholes, the role of PBMs in inflating drug prices, vertical integration of healthcare conglomerates, and changes to funding for government agencies charged with reviewing biosimilar drugs. Medicare reimbursement rates and the 340B program still unfairly incentivize use of bio-originator products. There are many barriers to achieving the goals of the BPCIA. With necessary changes, the U.S. can realize the goal of a competitive and sustainable biosimilar market that gradually reduces total drug expenditures and out-of-pocket costs over time without stifling innovation.

打破壁垒:竞争和负担得起的生物仿制药市场的基本改革。
综述目的:本次更新审查了目前生物仿制药的政策格局,特别是那些被批准用于治疗类风湿性关节炎的生物仿制药。我们回顾了最近的文献,并建议政策,使生物仿制药市场与生物价格竞争和创新法案(BPCIA)的目标保持一致。我们研究了生物类似药安全性和有效性的最新证据,FDA关于互换性的最新指南,以及反竞争行为和政府法规带来的挑战。此外,我们还分析了影响生物仿制药采用和竞争的财务激励和市场动态。最近的发现:建立在证明生物仿制药安全性和有效性的大量随机对照试验数据的基础上,来自北美和欧洲的真实证据现在证实了这些发现,包括在转换治疗的患者中。增加生物仿制药处方将取决于传播安全数据和加强医患沟通的策略。FDA更新了其互换性指南,不再需要大型临床研究,引用了对安全数据的最新理解;这可能促进更直接的基于价格的竞争。国会和联邦贸易委员会需要解决反竞争行为,包括专利法漏洞,药品福利管理在抬高药品价格中的作用,医疗保健集团的垂直整合,以及负责审查生物仿制药的政府机构的资金变化。医疗保险报销率和340B计划仍然不公平地鼓励使用生物原创产品。实现BPCIA的目标有许多障碍。通过必要的改革,美国可以实现一个具有竞争力和可持续发展的生物仿制药市场的目标,在不扼杀创新的情况下逐渐减少药品总支出和自付费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in the field of rheumatology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of rheumatologic conditions. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas such as the many forms of arthritis, osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also occasionally provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信