Trainee Perspectives After Nonvoluntary Plastic Surgery Program Closures: Lessons Learned and Steps Forward.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004397
Puja M Jagasia, Nicholas O'Sick, Megan E Fracol, Arya Andre Akhavan, Brian C Drolet, Matthew E Pontell
{"title":"Trainee Perspectives After Nonvoluntary Plastic Surgery Program Closures: Lessons Learned and Steps Forward.","authors":"Puja M Jagasia, Nicholas O'Sick, Megan E Fracol, Arya Andre Akhavan, Brian C Drolet, Matthew E Pontell","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the last decade, only 3 plastic surgery programs have faced nonvoluntary closure by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. These closures all occurred unexpectedly in April 2021 and affected 23 trainees. Although the dust has largely settled from this event, the insights of the affected trainees remain uncharacterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Program Closure Working Group of the American Society of Plastic Surgery's Resident Council created a 30-item questionnaire and distributed it to displaced trainees 1 year after program closures to capture their perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen trainees (84%) responded to the survey with respondents from all postgraduate year years, including incoming interns. Only 24% (4/17) trainees were notified of program closure on the day of closure decision, and 18% (3/17) never received official notice from their program. All trainees (100%, 17/17) reported that their home institution did not provide guidance regarding the relocation process, which cost a median of $10,000 and up to $50,000. No incoming intern was informed about potential program closure prior to rank list submission. The most difficult part of the relocation process was mental hardship (59%, 10/17), followed by finding an available residency spot (47%, 8/17). Department/division chairs (76%, 13/17) and program directors (71%, 12/17) were predominantly viewed as unsupportive and antagonistic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The plastic surgery community needs to be proactive in ensuring the support of trainees during nonvoluntary program closures. Fortunately, these events are rare, but when they do occur, they can be devastating. Moving forward, we propose tasking a single party to be responsible for ( a ) timely dispersion of information during program closures, ( b ) creating a protocol for leadership, ( c ) allocating a relocation stipend for trainees, and ( d ) facilitating the delivery of mental health resources to trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"233-236"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the last decade, only 3 plastic surgery programs have faced nonvoluntary closure by the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. These closures all occurred unexpectedly in April 2021 and affected 23 trainees. Although the dust has largely settled from this event, the insights of the affected trainees remain uncharacterized.

Methods: The Program Closure Working Group of the American Society of Plastic Surgery's Resident Council created a 30-item questionnaire and distributed it to displaced trainees 1 year after program closures to capture their perspectives.

Results: Seventeen trainees (84%) responded to the survey with respondents from all postgraduate year years, including incoming interns. Only 24% (4/17) trainees were notified of program closure on the day of closure decision, and 18% (3/17) never received official notice from their program. All trainees (100%, 17/17) reported that their home institution did not provide guidance regarding the relocation process, which cost a median of $10,000 and up to $50,000. No incoming intern was informed about potential program closure prior to rank list submission. The most difficult part of the relocation process was mental hardship (59%, 10/17), followed by finding an available residency spot (47%, 8/17). Department/division chairs (76%, 13/17) and program directors (71%, 12/17) were predominantly viewed as unsupportive and antagonistic.

Conclusion: The plastic surgery community needs to be proactive in ensuring the support of trainees during nonvoluntary program closures. Fortunately, these events are rare, but when they do occur, they can be devastating. Moving forward, we propose tasking a single party to be responsible for ( a ) timely dispersion of information during program closures, ( b ) creating a protocol for leadership, ( c ) allocating a relocation stipend for trainees, and ( d ) facilitating the delivery of mental health resources to trainees.

非自愿整形手术项目结束后的学员观点:经验教训和进步。
背景:在过去的十年中,只有3个整形外科项目面临着研究生医学教育认证委员会非自愿关闭的威胁。这些关闭都是在2021年4月意外发生的,影响了23名学员。虽然这一事件已经尘埃落定,但受影响的受训者的见解仍然是未知的。方法:美国整形外科学会驻院理事会项目结束工作组制作了一份30项的调查问卷,并在项目结束一年后分发给流离失所的学员,以了解他们的观点。结果:17名学员(84%)对调查做出了回应,受访者来自所有研究生年级,包括即将到来的实习生。只有24%(4/17)的学员在关闭决定当天收到了项目关闭的通知,18%(3/17)的学员从未收到其项目的正式通知。所有受训人员(100%,17/17)报告说,他们所在的机构没有提供有关搬迁过程的指导,搬迁费用中位数为1万美元,最高可达5万美元。在提交排名表之前,没有新实习生被告知可能的项目关闭。搬迁过程中最困难的部分是精神困难(59%,10/17),其次是寻找可用的居住地点(47%,8/17)。系/部门主任(76%,13/17)和项目主任(71%,12/17)主要被视为不支持和敌对。结论:整形界需要积极主动地确保学员在非自愿项目关闭期间得到支持。幸运的是,这些事件很少发生,但一旦发生,它们可能是毁灭性的。展望未来,我们建议指定一个单独的机构负责(a)在项目结束期间及时传播信息,(b)为领导制定协议,(c)为受训人员分配搬迁津贴,以及(d)促进向受训人员提供心理健康资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信