Real-world evaluation of automated insulin delivery therapy in type 1 diabetes: A multicentre study across regional and metropolitan Queensland, Australia
{"title":"Real-world evaluation of automated insulin delivery therapy in type 1 diabetes: A multicentre study across regional and metropolitan Queensland, Australia","authors":"Akash Konantambigi MBBS, Wenyong Wang RN, Dylan Boggild MBBS, Arushi Rana MBBS, Larisa Syphers MBBS, Catherine Presley RN, Candice Cummins RN, Usman Malabu FRACP, Kate Hawke FRACP, Vasant Shenoy FRACP, Gaurav Puri FRACP, Harshal Deshmukh FRACP","doi":"10.1111/dom.16485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, which integrate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with automated insulin dosing, have emerged as a transformative therapy. However, real-world data on AID effectiveness, particularly in regional Australia, remain limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective audit across three Australian hospital sites—Logan (metropolitan), Mackay and Townsville (regional)—to evaluate the impact of AID therapy in adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM). Data on demographics, comorbidities, CGM metrics and clinical outcomes were extracted from medical records and device platforms. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c and CGM time-in-range (TIR; 3.9–10 mmol/L) at follow-up. Follow-up data were recorded up to 12 months following AID commencement. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, glycaemic variability and predictors of HbA1c reduction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study consisted of 158 people living with T1DM who were initiated on AID. Following AID initiation, mean TIR improved from 53.4% (SD 21.1%) to 70.0% (SD 14.6%) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and time in hyperglycaemia (>13.9 mmol/L) declined from 18.7% (SD 19.4%) to 8.4% (SD 9.31%) (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). The mean HbA1c significantly decreased from 8.62% (SD 1.70) at baseline to 7.34% (SD 1.31) at follow-up across the entire study cohort (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), with 42.7% achieving <7% and 64.1% achieving <7.5% at follow-up. Multivariable regression identified higher baseline HbA1c (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) as a significant predictor of HbA1c reduction. Improvements were consistent across AID system types and geographical settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>AID therapy significantly improves glycaemic control in adults with T1DM in both regional and metropolitan Australia. Our findings support the real-world effectiveness of AID systems and highlight their potential to bridge care gaps across diverse settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"27 8","pages":"4436-4445"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dom.16485","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, which integrate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with automated insulin dosing, have emerged as a transformative therapy. However, real-world data on AID effectiveness, particularly in regional Australia, remain limited.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective audit across three Australian hospital sites—Logan (metropolitan), Mackay and Townsville (regional)—to evaluate the impact of AID therapy in adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM). Data on demographics, comorbidities, CGM metrics and clinical outcomes were extracted from medical records and device platforms. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c and CGM time-in-range (TIR; 3.9–10 mmol/L) at follow-up. Follow-up data were recorded up to 12 months following AID commencement. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, glycaemic variability and predictors of HbA1c reduction.
Results
The study consisted of 158 people living with T1DM who were initiated on AID. Following AID initiation, mean TIR improved from 53.4% (SD 21.1%) to 70.0% (SD 14.6%) (p < 0.0001), and time in hyperglycaemia (>13.9 mmol/L) declined from 18.7% (SD 19.4%) to 8.4% (SD 9.31%) (p < 0.0001). The mean HbA1c significantly decreased from 8.62% (SD 1.70) at baseline to 7.34% (SD 1.31) at follow-up across the entire study cohort (p < 0.0001), with 42.7% achieving <7% and 64.1% achieving <7.5% at follow-up. Multivariable regression identified higher baseline HbA1c (p < 0.0001) as a significant predictor of HbA1c reduction. Improvements were consistent across AID system types and geographical settings.
Conclusions
AID therapy significantly improves glycaemic control in adults with T1DM in both regional and metropolitan Australia. Our findings support the real-world effectiveness of AID systems and highlight their potential to bridge care gaps across diverse settings.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.