Performance and Psychometric Properties of Novel Brief Assessments for Depression in Children and Adolescents

Paul E. Croarkin DO, MS , Paul A. Nakonezny PhD , David W. Morris PhD , A. John Rush MD , Betsy D. Kennard PsyD, ABPP , Graham J. Emslie MD
{"title":"Performance and Psychometric Properties of Novel Brief Assessments for Depression in Children and Adolescents","authors":"Paul E. Croarkin DO, MS ,&nbsp;Paul A. Nakonezny PhD ,&nbsp;David W. Morris PhD ,&nbsp;A. John Rush MD ,&nbsp;Betsy D. Kennard PsyD, ABPP ,&nbsp;Graham J. Emslie MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Current rating scales for depressive symptom severity in pediatric patients do not meet the needs of contemporary clinical practice and research. This study sought to evaluate relative performance and psychometric properties of the 5-item Brief Children’s Depression Rating Scale—Revised (BCDRS-R5), as well as the clinician-rated and self-report versions of the 5-item Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (VQIDS-A5-C and VQIDS-A5-SR, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This study examined a sample of 165 outpatients aged 8 to 17 years with major depressive disorder who were treated openly with fluoxetine for 6 weeks from a prior National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)–funded study. We examined the internal consistency, scale dimensionality, relative performance in detecting remission and response, and sensitivity to change of each 5-item scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All 3 brief scales had good-to-excellent internal consistency. Cronbach coefficient α values were 0.687 to 0.795 at baseline and 0.766 to 0.844 at week 6. Principal component analysis suggested a 1-factor solution for each scale. The BCDRS-R5 demonstrated a greater degree of accuracy in identifying response and remission compared to the VQIDS-A5-C and VQIDS-A5-SR. The scales were sensitive to change in symptom severity over 6 weeks of acute treatment with fluoxetine.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Three novel, brief scales assessing depressive symptom severity in pediatric patients showed similar performance and sensitivity to change in symptom severity over 6 weeks of acute treatment when compared with longer, standard scales.</div></div><div><h3>Plain language summary</h3><div>Existing assessment tools for depressive symptom severity in children and adolescents have limitations and do not meet the needs of contemporary families, clinical practice, or research efforts. The purpose of the current study, using a sample of youth with depression, was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 5-item Brief Children's Depression Rating Scale–Revised (BCDRS-R5) as well as the 5-item Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-report and clinician-rated versions (VQIDS-A5-SR/VQIDS-A5-C), compare their relative performance, and define clinically-relevant depressive symptom severity thresholds for remission. These novel, brief scales had similar performance as longer, standard scales and show promise for future use in clinical practice and research efforts.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration information</h3><div>Sequential Treatment of Pediatric MDD to Increase Remission and Prevent Relapse; <span><span>https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00612313</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73525,"journal":{"name":"JAACAP open","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 335-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAACAP open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949732924000449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Current rating scales for depressive symptom severity in pediatric patients do not meet the needs of contemporary clinical practice and research. This study sought to evaluate relative performance and psychometric properties of the 5-item Brief Children’s Depression Rating Scale—Revised (BCDRS-R5), as well as the clinician-rated and self-report versions of the 5-item Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (VQIDS-A5-C and VQIDS-A5-SR, respectively).

Method

This study examined a sample of 165 outpatients aged 8 to 17 years with major depressive disorder who were treated openly with fluoxetine for 6 weeks from a prior National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)–funded study. We examined the internal consistency, scale dimensionality, relative performance in detecting remission and response, and sensitivity to change of each 5-item scale.

Results

All 3 brief scales had good-to-excellent internal consistency. Cronbach coefficient α values were 0.687 to 0.795 at baseline and 0.766 to 0.844 at week 6. Principal component analysis suggested a 1-factor solution for each scale. The BCDRS-R5 demonstrated a greater degree of accuracy in identifying response and remission compared to the VQIDS-A5-C and VQIDS-A5-SR. The scales were sensitive to change in symptom severity over 6 weeks of acute treatment with fluoxetine.

Conclusion

Three novel, brief scales assessing depressive symptom severity in pediatric patients showed similar performance and sensitivity to change in symptom severity over 6 weeks of acute treatment when compared with longer, standard scales.

Plain language summary

Existing assessment tools for depressive symptom severity in children and adolescents have limitations and do not meet the needs of contemporary families, clinical practice, or research efforts. The purpose of the current study, using a sample of youth with depression, was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 5-item Brief Children's Depression Rating Scale–Revised (BCDRS-R5) as well as the 5-item Very Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology self-report and clinician-rated versions (VQIDS-A5-SR/VQIDS-A5-C), compare their relative performance, and define clinically-relevant depressive symptom severity thresholds for remission. These novel, brief scales had similar performance as longer, standard scales and show promise for future use in clinical practice and research efforts.

Clinical trial registration information

Sequential Treatment of Pediatric MDD to Increase Remission and Prevent Relapse; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00612313.
儿童和青少年抑郁症简易评估的表现和心理测量学特征
目的现行儿童抑郁症状严重程度评定量表不能满足当代临床实践和研究的需要。本研究旨在评估5项《简明儿童抑郁评定量表修订版》(BCDRS-R5)的相对表现和心理测量学特征,以及5项《抑郁症状快速量表》(VQIDS-A5-C和VQIDS-A5-SR)的临床评定和自我报告版本。方法本研究调查了165例8至17岁的重度抑郁症门诊患者,这些患者公开使用氟西汀治疗6周,这些患者来自先前的国家精神卫生研究所(NIMH)资助的研究。我们检验了各5项量表的内部一致性、量表维度、检测缓解和反应的相对表现以及对变化的敏感性。结果3种简易量表的内部一致性均为良至优。基线时Cronbach系数α值为0.687 ~ 0.795,第6周时为0.766 ~ 0.844。主成分分析表明,每个量表的单因素解决方案。与VQIDS-A5-C和VQIDS-A5-SR相比,BCDRS-R5在识别缓解和缓解方面表现出更高的准确性。该量表对氟西汀急性治疗6周后症状严重程度的变化敏感。结论:与较长的标准量表相比,三个新的、简短的评估儿科患者抑郁症状严重程度的量表在6周急性治疗期间的表现和对症状严重程度变化的敏感性相似。现有的儿童和青少年抑郁症状严重程度评估工具存在局限性,不能满足当代家庭、临床实践或研究工作的需要。本研究以青少年抑郁症患者为样本,目的是评估5项儿童抑郁简易评定量表(BCDRS-R5)和5项抑郁症状快速量表(VQIDS-A5-SR/VQIDS-A5-C)的心理测量学特性,比较它们的相对表现,并定义临床相关的抑郁症状严重程度阈值。这些新颖、简短的量表与较长的标准量表具有相似的性能,并有望在未来的临床实践和研究工作中使用。序贯治疗儿童重度抑郁症增加缓解和预防复发https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00612313。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAACAP open
JAACAP open Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信