Genomic Data Sharing: Navigating The Ethical Issues In Collaborative Research Relationships Between The Global North-South.

African journal of bioethics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.58177/ajb240007
Deborah Ekusai Sebatta, David Kyaddondo, John Barugahare, David Kaawa-Mafigiri, Shenuka Singh, Erisa Mwaka
{"title":"Genomic Data Sharing: Navigating The Ethical Issues In Collaborative Research Relationships Between The Global North-South.","authors":"Deborah Ekusai Sebatta, David Kyaddondo, John Barugahare, David Kaawa-Mafigiri, Shenuka Singh, Erisa Mwaka","doi":"10.58177/ajb240007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, Africa has seen a significant growth in genomic research, leading to the sharing of participant data between researchers in Africa and across the globe.The study aimed to investigate the ethical issues that impacted the sharing of genomic data during collaborative research and explored strategies to promote equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a phenomenological qualitative study that utilized the told experiences of key informant interviews to collect data from August 2023 to March 2024. A total of 38 key informants participated in this study, of whom 28.9% were female, and their ages ranged between 30-64 years. The participants included researchers involved in genomics research (16), members of research ethics committees (14), and officials from national regulatory bodies. (8) Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo software 14 was utilized to assist in data management. A total of four main themes emerged: (mis)trust in collaborative research, inequitable access to data due, power differentials, and data sharing as a form of ethical imperialism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed (mis)trust in collaborative research was influenced by fear of data misuse, and no framework for benefit sharing. (In)equitable access to data by researchers from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) was attributed to poor infrastructure and limited skill. Researchers in LMICs could be compromised because of the power differentials with their counterparts from the North, resulting in exploitation. Data sharing could be perceived as a form of ethical imperialism by the North imposing its culture on the South.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Establishing relationships with international collaborators that are built on trust and equity is critical. Policymakers should consider developing regulatory frameworks that foster equity and fairness in data sharing and access in collaborative research. This will be facilitated by engaging in active advocacy dialogues with funders, and policymakers, and researchers from both the North and South. Researchers from the Global South should have their capacities strengthened and empowered so they have the skills necessary to access and utilize the data as well as advocate favourably.</p>","PeriodicalId":520849,"journal":{"name":"African journal of bioethics","volume":"2024 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58177/ajb240007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, Africa has seen a significant growth in genomic research, leading to the sharing of participant data between researchers in Africa and across the globe.The study aimed to investigate the ethical issues that impacted the sharing of genomic data during collaborative research and explored strategies to promote equity.

Methods: This was a phenomenological qualitative study that utilized the told experiences of key informant interviews to collect data from August 2023 to March 2024. A total of 38 key informants participated in this study, of whom 28.9% were female, and their ages ranged between 30-64 years. The participants included researchers involved in genomics research (16), members of research ethics committees (14), and officials from national regulatory bodies. (8) Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic analysis and NVivo software 14 was utilized to assist in data management. A total of four main themes emerged: (mis)trust in collaborative research, inequitable access to data due, power differentials, and data sharing as a form of ethical imperialism.

Results: The study revealed (mis)trust in collaborative research was influenced by fear of data misuse, and no framework for benefit sharing. (In)equitable access to data by researchers from low and middle-income countries (LMICs) was attributed to poor infrastructure and limited skill. Researchers in LMICs could be compromised because of the power differentials with their counterparts from the North, resulting in exploitation. Data sharing could be perceived as a form of ethical imperialism by the North imposing its culture on the South.

Conclusion: Establishing relationships with international collaborators that are built on trust and equity is critical. Policymakers should consider developing regulatory frameworks that foster equity and fairness in data sharing and access in collaborative research. This will be facilitated by engaging in active advocacy dialogues with funders, and policymakers, and researchers from both the North and South. Researchers from the Global South should have their capacities strengthened and empowered so they have the skills necessary to access and utilize the data as well as advocate favourably.

基因组数据共享:导航全球南北合作研究关系中的伦理问题。
背景:近年来,非洲在基因组研究方面取得了显著增长,导致非洲和全球研究人员之间共享参与者数据。本研究旨在探讨在合作研究中影响基因组数据共享的伦理问题,并探讨促进公平的策略。方法:采用现象学定性研究方法,在2023年8月至2024年3月期间,利用关键举报人访谈的讲述经历收集数据。共有38名关键举报人参与本研究,其中女性占28.9%,年龄在30-64岁之间。与会者包括参与基因组学研究的科学家(16人)、研究伦理委员会的成员(14人)以及国家监管机构的官员。(8)访谈逐字记录,采用专题分析进行分析,利用NVivo软件14辅助数据管理。总共出现了四个主要主题:对合作研究的(错误)信任,由于数据获取的不公平,权力差异以及作为一种道德帝国主义形式的数据共享。结果:研究发现,对合作研究的(错误)信任受到对数据滥用的恐惧的影响,并且没有利益分享的框架。低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的研究人员公平获取数据的原因是基础设施差和技能有限。由于与北方同行的权力差异,中低收入国家的研究人员可能受到损害,从而导致剥削。数据共享可能被视为朝鲜将其文化强加给韩国的一种道德帝国主义。结论:在信任和平等的基础上与国际合作者建立关系至关重要。决策者应该考虑制定监管框架,促进合作研究中数据共享和获取的公平和公平。这将通过与来自南北双方的资助者、政策制定者和研究人员进行积极的倡导对话来促进。来自全球南方的研究人员的能力应该得到加强和授权,以便他们拥有获取和利用数据以及积极倡导的必要技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信