Contrast-enhanced mammography in high-dense breasts: a narrative review.

IF 1.4
Daniele Ugo Tari, Marika Santarsiere, Davide Raffaele De Lucia, Rosalinda Santonastaso
{"title":"Contrast-enhanced mammography in high-dense breasts: a narrative review.","authors":"Daniele Ugo Tari, Marika Santarsiere, Davide Raffaele De Lucia, Rosalinda Santonastaso","doi":"10.21037/tbcr-24-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) combines iodine-based contrast agents with dual-energy imaging to enhance the detection of breast cancer, especially in women with dense breast tissue. Dense breasts, which obscure conventional mammography results, present unique diagnostic challenges and an elevated risk of cancer. This review explores the role of CEM in improving diagnostic accuracy in high-density breasts, its comparative performance with other imaging modalities, and its potential implications for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a narrative analysis on the use of CEM in dense breast tissue by searching PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), and Google Scholar between September and November 2024. Keywords, rather than MeSH terms, were utilized to refine the search, focusing on terms appearing in article titles. Sixty-six articles were identified, and duplicates or non-eligible studies were excluded, resulting in a final selection of 21 articles published between 2013 and 2024. Additional references were identified through snowballing to contextualize findings.</p><p><strong>Key content and findings: </strong>CEM demonstrates high sensitivity (89-97.7%) and specificity (50-89%) in detecting malignancies within dense breasts, offering comparable diagnostic accuracy to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but with better accessibility and lower cost. Unlike traditional mammography, CEM enhances visibility through functional imaging of contrast uptake, improving detection of small or occult lesions. It also aids in pre-surgical planning by assessing tumor size and multiplicity with greater precision. However, CEM is not without limitations, including radiation exposure and variability in equipment standards. Comparative analyses suggest CEM bridges the gap between conventional mammography and advanced techniques like MRI, particularly in resource-constrained settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CEM represents a significant advancement in breast cancer detection, addressing limitations posed by dense breast tissue. Its diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and patient accessibility position it as a valuable tool in personalized screening strategies. Further standardization and integration into clinical workflows could expand its role in routine breast cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":101427,"journal":{"name":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","volume":"6 ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tbcr-24-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) combines iodine-based contrast agents with dual-energy imaging to enhance the detection of breast cancer, especially in women with dense breast tissue. Dense breasts, which obscure conventional mammography results, present unique diagnostic challenges and an elevated risk of cancer. This review explores the role of CEM in improving diagnostic accuracy in high-density breasts, its comparative performance with other imaging modalities, and its potential implications for clinical practice.

Methods: We conducted a narrative analysis on the use of CEM in dense breast tissue by searching PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), and Google Scholar between September and November 2024. Keywords, rather than MeSH terms, were utilized to refine the search, focusing on terms appearing in article titles. Sixty-six articles were identified, and duplicates or non-eligible studies were excluded, resulting in a final selection of 21 articles published between 2013 and 2024. Additional references were identified through snowballing to contextualize findings.

Key content and findings: CEM demonstrates high sensitivity (89-97.7%) and specificity (50-89%) in detecting malignancies within dense breasts, offering comparable diagnostic accuracy to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but with better accessibility and lower cost. Unlike traditional mammography, CEM enhances visibility through functional imaging of contrast uptake, improving detection of small or occult lesions. It also aids in pre-surgical planning by assessing tumor size and multiplicity with greater precision. However, CEM is not without limitations, including radiation exposure and variability in equipment standards. Comparative analyses suggest CEM bridges the gap between conventional mammography and advanced techniques like MRI, particularly in resource-constrained settings.

Conclusions: CEM represents a significant advancement in breast cancer detection, addressing limitations posed by dense breast tissue. Its diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and patient accessibility position it as a valuable tool in personalized screening strategies. Further standardization and integration into clinical workflows could expand its role in routine breast cancer management.

Abstract Image

高密度乳腺造影:一篇叙述性综述。
背景与目的:对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)将基于碘的造影剂与双能成像相结合,以增强乳腺癌的检测,特别是在乳腺组织致密的女性中。致密的乳房掩盖了传统乳房x光检查的结果,给诊断带来了独特的挑战,并增加了患癌的风险。这篇综述探讨了CEM在提高高密度乳腺诊断准确性方面的作用,它与其他成像方式的比较表现,以及它对临床实践的潜在影响。方法:通过检索PubMed、Web of Science (WoS)和谷歌Scholar,对2024年9 - 11月间CEM在致密乳腺组织中的应用进行叙事分析。关键词,而不是MeSH术语,被用来优化搜索,重点是出现在文章标题中的术语。确定了66篇文章,排除了重复或不符合条件的研究,最终选择了2013年至2024年间发表的21篇文章。通过滚雪球来确定其他参考文献,以将研究结果置于背景中。关键内容和发现:CEM在检测致密乳腺内的恶性肿瘤方面具有高灵敏度(89-97.7%)和特异性(50-89%),诊断准确性与磁共振成像(MRI)相当,但更容易获得且成本更低。与传统的乳房x线摄影不同,CEM通过造影剂摄取的功能成像增强了可见性,提高了对小病变或隐匿性病变的检测。它还通过更精确地评估肿瘤大小和多样性来帮助术前计划。然而,CEM并非没有限制,包括辐射暴露和设备标准的可变性。对比分析表明,CEM弥补了传统乳房x光检查和MRI等先进技术之间的差距,特别是在资源有限的情况下。结论:CEM代表了乳腺癌检测的重大进步,解决了致密乳腺组织带来的限制。它的诊断准确性、成本效益和患者可及性使其成为个性化筛查策略中有价值的工具。进一步的标准化和整合到临床工作流程中可以扩大其在常规乳腺癌管理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信