Effect of UV-Photofunctionalization of titanium implants on stability,crestal bone loss in controlled diabetic patients: A split mouth randomized clinical trial.

Dr D Murali Krishna, Dr Sruthima Nvs Gottumukkala, Dr M Satya Narayana Raju, Dr Gautami S Penmetsa, Dr Ramesh Ksv, Dr Mohan Kumar P, Dr Vnv Satya Valli, Dr Bhavya M
{"title":"Effect of UV-Photofunctionalization of titanium implants on stability,crestal bone loss in controlled diabetic patients: A split mouth randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Dr D Murali Krishna, Dr Sruthima Nvs Gottumukkala, Dr M Satya Narayana Raju, Dr Gautami S Penmetsa, Dr Ramesh Ksv, Dr Mohan Kumar P, Dr Vnv Satya Valli, Dr Bhavya M","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the effects of UV photofunctionalized (UVP) dental implants on implant stability, osseointegration, and radiographical bone changes with non-UV photofunctionalized (NUVP) dental implants placed in controlled diabetics.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Participants were selected using stratified random sampling to ensure proportional representation of age groups, gender, and other relevant subgroups within the controlled diabetic population. The sites were randomly allocated into UVP and NUVP groups. In the UVP group, implants were photofunctionalized in a UV activator for 20 sec before implant placement. Crestal bone changes were measured at 3- and 9-months post-implant placement. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were done to analyze intra-group and inter-group comparison study data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implant stability and osseointegration were assessed using implant stability quotient (ISQ) and Osseointegration index (OSI) immediately after implant placement and 3 months post-placement. Intra-group comparison of ISQ showed significantly higher ISQ (p=<0.029) in the UVP group (4.40±1.89) compared to the NUVP group (2.60±1.17). The mean change in implant stability from baseline to 3 months was also significantly higher (p=0.29) in the UVP group (4.4±1.89compared to the NUVP group (2.6±1.17). A significantly higher mean OSI (p=0.032) was noted in the UVP group (1.42±0.62) compared to the NUVP group (0.84±0.39). On comparison of mean crestal bone changes on the distal aspect, significantly higher mean bone loss(p=0.003) was noted at 9 months in the NUVP group (0.64±0.18) compared to the UVP group (0.35±0.08).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The UVP group showed greater benefits in enhanced secondary stability, higher OSI, and less crestal bone loss compared to the NUVP group in controlled diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-24-00160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the effects of UV photofunctionalized (UVP) dental implants on implant stability, osseointegration, and radiographical bone changes with non-UV photofunctionalized (NUVP) dental implants placed in controlled diabetics.

Methodology: Participants were selected using stratified random sampling to ensure proportional representation of age groups, gender, and other relevant subgroups within the controlled diabetic population. The sites were randomly allocated into UVP and NUVP groups. In the UVP group, implants were photofunctionalized in a UV activator for 20 sec before implant placement. Crestal bone changes were measured at 3- and 9-months post-implant placement. Descriptive statistics and paired t-tests were done to analyze intra-group and inter-group comparison study data.

Results: Implant stability and osseointegration were assessed using implant stability quotient (ISQ) and Osseointegration index (OSI) immediately after implant placement and 3 months post-placement. Intra-group comparison of ISQ showed significantly higher ISQ (p=<0.029) in the UVP group (4.40±1.89) compared to the NUVP group (2.60±1.17). The mean change in implant stability from baseline to 3 months was also significantly higher (p=0.29) in the UVP group (4.4±1.89compared to the NUVP group (2.6±1.17). A significantly higher mean OSI (p=0.032) was noted in the UVP group (1.42±0.62) compared to the NUVP group (0.84±0.39). On comparison of mean crestal bone changes on the distal aspect, significantly higher mean bone loss(p=0.003) was noted at 9 months in the NUVP group (0.64±0.18) compared to the UVP group (0.35±0.08).

Conclusion: The UVP group showed greater benefits in enhanced secondary stability, higher OSI, and less crestal bone loss compared to the NUVP group in controlled diabetic patients.

紫外光功能化钛种植体对糖尿病患者稳定性和牙冠骨丢失的影响:一项裂口随机临床试验。
目的:评价和比较紫外线光功能化(UVP)种植体与非紫外线光功能化(NUVP)种植体在控制糖尿病患者种植体稳定性、骨整合和骨影像学变化方面的影响。方法:采用分层随机抽样的方法选择参与者,以确保在控制的糖尿病人群中年龄、性别和其他相关亚组的比例代表性。试验点随机分为UVP组和NUVP组。在UVP组中,种植体在植入前在UV激活剂中光功能化20秒。在种植体放置后3个月和9个月测量冠骨变化。采用描述性统计和配对t检验对组内和组间比较研究数据进行分析。结果:采用种植体稳定性商(ISQ)和骨整合指数(OSI)评估种植体稳定性和骨整合度。结论:与NUVP组相比,UVP组在控制糖尿病患者的继发性稳定性增强、高OSI和更少的嵴骨丢失方面表现出更大的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信