Long-Term Outcome Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Real-World Data Analysis.

Yi-Hsien Chen, Yun-Yi Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Jing-Tong Wang, Ming-Hsien Tsai
{"title":"Long-Term Outcome Analysis of Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Real-World Data Analysis.","authors":"Yi-Hsien Chen, Yun-Yi Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Jing-Tong Wang, Ming-Hsien Tsai","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive research on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), understanding long-term outcomes between these modalities remains limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the clinical outcomes of PD and HD in a real-world context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we studied patients who underwent dialysis from January 2006 to December 2017. Patients with a history of cancer, renal transplantation, age < 20 or > 84 years, or patients on PD who switched to HD within 3 months of starting the modality were excluded. They were categorized into three groups: HD-only (n = 59,751), PD-only (n = 3969), and PD-to-HD transition (n = 3196). Propensity score matching based on sex, age, and the Charlson comorbidity index was used to create comparable groups. Hazard ratios (HR) for clinical outcomes were calculated using the Cox regression model, comparing HD-only versus PD-only and the transition group outcomes. Follow-up continued until December 31, 2020. Finally, external validation was performed using the global TriNetX dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1:1 propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, the HD-only group (n = 3969) exhibited significantly lower all-cause mortality and infection-related admissions compared to the PD-only group (n = 3969) (HRs 0.77 and 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83 and 0.70-0.80, respectively), with a survival advantage across most subgroups. Conversely, the PD-to-HD transition group (n = 2014) had worse hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes than those on PD-only (n = 2014) (HRs 1.83 and 1.22, 95% CIs: 1.71-1.97 and 1.10-1.36, respectively) but showed neutral mortality rates. A survival benefit emerged 2 years post-transition from PD to HD, with an HR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.74). These findings were corroborated by the TriNetX data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that HD patients tend to have better clinical outcomes, including greater longevity, compared to PD patients. Thus, the choice of dialysis modality should be tailored to individual patient needs for optimal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite extensive research on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), understanding long-term outcomes between these modalities remains limited. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the clinical outcomes of PD and HD in a real-world context.

Methods: Utilizing the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we studied patients who underwent dialysis from January 2006 to December 2017. Patients with a history of cancer, renal transplantation, age < 20 or > 84 years, or patients on PD who switched to HD within 3 months of starting the modality were excluded. They were categorized into three groups: HD-only (n = 59,751), PD-only (n = 3969), and PD-to-HD transition (n = 3196). Propensity score matching based on sex, age, and the Charlson comorbidity index was used to create comparable groups. Hazard ratios (HR) for clinical outcomes were calculated using the Cox regression model, comparing HD-only versus PD-only and the transition group outcomes. Follow-up continued until December 31, 2020. Finally, external validation was performed using the global TriNetX dataset.

Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching and multivariable adjustment, the HD-only group (n = 3969) exhibited significantly lower all-cause mortality and infection-related admissions compared to the PD-only group (n = 3969) (HRs 0.77 and 0.75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83 and 0.70-0.80, respectively), with a survival advantage across most subgroups. Conversely, the PD-to-HD transition group (n = 2014) had worse hospitalization and major adverse cardiovascular event outcomes than those on PD-only (n = 2014) (HRs 1.83 and 1.22, 95% CIs: 1.71-1.97 and 1.10-1.36, respectively) but showed neutral mortality rates. A survival benefit emerged 2 years post-transition from PD to HD, with an HR of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.74). These findings were corroborated by the TriNetX data.

Conclusion: Our study indicates that HD patients tend to have better clinical outcomes, including greater longevity, compared to PD patients. Thus, the choice of dialysis modality should be tailored to individual patient needs for optimal outcomes.

终末期肾病患者腹膜透析和血液透析的长期结果分析:真实世界数据分析
背景:尽管对腹膜透析(PD)和血液透析(HD)进行了广泛的研究,但对这两种方式之间的长期结果的了解仍然有限。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估PD和HD在现实世界中的临床结果。方法:利用台湾全民健康保险研究数据库,对2006年1月至2017年12月接受透析治疗的患者进行研究。排除了有癌症史、肾移植史、年龄84岁或PD患者在开始治疗后3个月内转为HD的患者。他们被分为三组:纯hd (n = 59,751),纯pd (n = 3969)和PD-to-HD过渡(n = 3196)。使用基于性别、年龄和Charlson合并症指数的倾向评分匹配来创建可比较的组。使用Cox回归模型计算临床结果的风险比(HR),比较单纯hd组与单纯pd组以及过渡组的结果。随访持续至2020年12月31日。最后,使用全局TriNetX数据集执行外部验证。结果:经过1:1的倾向评分匹配和多变量调整后,与pd组(n = 3969)相比,hd组(n = 3969)的全因死亡率和感染相关入院率显著降低(hr分别为0.77和0.75,95% CI分别为0.72-0.83和0.70-0.80),并且在大多数亚组中具有生存优势。相反,PD-to-HD过渡组(n = 2014)的住院和主要不良心血管事件结局比PD-only组(n = 2014)更差(hr分别为1.83和1.22,95% ci分别为1.71-1.97和1.10-1.36),但死亡率为中性。从PD到HD转换2年后出现生存获益,风险比为0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.74)。这些发现得到了TriNetX数据的证实。结论:我们的研究表明,与PD患者相比,HD患者往往具有更好的临床结果,包括更长的寿命。因此,透析方式的选择应根据个别患者的需要进行调整,以获得最佳结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信