A Digital Care Plan Nudge to Improve Primary Care Outcomes.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400419
Mitesh S Patel, Thomas A Aloia, Aaron G Shoemaker, Mohamad G Fakih, Frederick A Masoudi, Luke Smith, Emily Rosenzweig, Krisda H Chaiyachati, Benjamin N Conrad, Jeevan Bandreddi, Richard I Fogel
{"title":"A Digital Care Plan Nudge to Improve Primary Care Outcomes.","authors":"Mitesh S Patel, Thomas A Aloia, Aaron G Shoemaker, Mohamad G Fakih, Frederick A Masoudi, Luke Smith, Emily Rosenzweig, Krisda H Chaiyachati, Benjamin N Conrad, Jeevan Bandreddi, Richard I Fogel","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventive care is underutilized in the United States. A digital care plan nudge delivered prior to primary care visits may prime patients to address these care gaps during the visit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-group, cluster randomized trial of 76 primary care practices in four U.S. states compared usual care with a digital care plan nudge, which sent text messages to patients before a primary care visit informing them of up to three of six possible care gaps to address at the visit. Outcomes were care gaps addressed the day of the visit (primary) and completed by 90 days after the visit (secondary). We also explored appointment engagement and patient experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 204 clinicians with 29,334 patient encounters. The mean (standard deviation) patient age was 56.9 (16.5) years, 61.0% were female, and 15.2% and 11.1% were Black and non-Hispanic or Hispanic, respectively. The primary outcome of care gaps addressed at the visit occurred in 23.5% of cases in the intervention group, compared with 20.3% of cases in the usual care group (adjusted difference 3.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.4 to 8.1; P=0.08). The intervention was associated with greater care gaps completed by 90 days (5.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.7 to 10.1). In post hoc analyses, the intervention was also associated with greater appointment engagement with an increase in completion (difference of 2.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.8), a decrease in no-shows (-1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.6) and a decrease in cancellations (-1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.2 to -0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This trial of a digital care plan nudge did not meet the primary outcome of addressing care gaps during the visit. Observed associations in secondary outcomes, including care gap closure within 90 days and appointment engagement, warrant further evaluation. (Funded by Ascension; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05799976.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 6","pages":"EVIDoa2400419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preventive care is underutilized in the United States. A digital care plan nudge delivered prior to primary care visits may prime patients to address these care gaps during the visit.

Methods: A two-group, cluster randomized trial of 76 primary care practices in four U.S. states compared usual care with a digital care plan nudge, which sent text messages to patients before a primary care visit informing them of up to three of six possible care gaps to address at the visit. Outcomes were care gaps addressed the day of the visit (primary) and completed by 90 days after the visit (secondary). We also explored appointment engagement and patient experience.

Results: The sample included 204 clinicians with 29,334 patient encounters. The mean (standard deviation) patient age was 56.9 (16.5) years, 61.0% were female, and 15.2% and 11.1% were Black and non-Hispanic or Hispanic, respectively. The primary outcome of care gaps addressed at the visit occurred in 23.5% of cases in the intervention group, compared with 20.3% of cases in the usual care group (adjusted difference 3.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.4 to 8.1; P=0.08). The intervention was associated with greater care gaps completed by 90 days (5.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.7 to 10.1). In post hoc analyses, the intervention was also associated with greater appointment engagement with an increase in completion (difference of 2.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 3.8), a decrease in no-shows (-1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.7 to -0.6) and a decrease in cancellations (-1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.2 to -0.8).

Conclusions: This trial of a digital care plan nudge did not meet the primary outcome of addressing care gaps during the visit. Observed associations in secondary outcomes, including care gap closure within 90 days and appointment engagement, warrant further evaluation. (Funded by Ascension; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05799976.).

数字医疗计划推动改善初级保健结果。
背景:预防保健在美国没有得到充分利用。在初级保健访问之前提供的数字护理计划推动可以使患者在访问期间解决这些护理差距。方法:在美国四个州的76个初级保健实践中进行了两组,集群随机试验,比较了常规护理和数字护理计划推动,在初级保健就诊前向患者发送短信,告知他们在就诊时最多可以解决六个可能的护理差距中的三个。结果是就诊当天(主要)的护理差距得到解决,并在就诊后90天内(次要)得到解决。我们还探讨了预约参与和患者体验。结果:样本包括204名临床医生和29,334名患者。平均(标准差)患者年龄为56.9(16.5)岁,61.0%为女性,15.2%和11.1%分别为黑人和非西班牙裔或西班牙裔。干预组23.5%的病例在就诊时解决了护理缺口的主要结果,而常规护理组的这一比例为20.3%(调整后差异3.8个百分点;95%置信区间(CI), -0.4 ~ 8.1;P = 0.08)。干预与90天内完成的更大护理缺口相关(5.4个百分点;95% CI, 0.7 ~ 10.1)。在事后分析中,干预还与更大的预约参与有关,完成率增加(差异为2.8个百分点;95% CI, 1.8 - 3.8),未到访者减少(-1.2个百分点;95% CI, -1.7至-0.6),取消率下降(-1.5个百分点;95% CI, -2.2至-0.8)。结论:该试验的数字护理计划推动不满足解决护理差距的主要结果在访问。观察到的次要结局的关联,包括90天内护理差距的弥合和预约,值得进一步评估。(由Ascension资助;ClinicalTrials.gov号码:NCT05799976)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信