Pregnancy and physical disability: A scoping review.

Women's health (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1177/17455057251338424
Claire Z Kalpakjian, Lukonde Mulenga, Shannen M McIntosh, Jodi M Kreschmer, Rebecca Parten, Heidi Haapala, Elizabeth S Langen, Sara A S Rosenblum, Svati Pazhyanur, Susan Carlson, Maryam Berri, Susan D Ernst
{"title":"Pregnancy and physical disability: A scoping review.","authors":"Claire Z Kalpakjian, Lukonde Mulenga, Shannen M McIntosh, Jodi M Kreschmer, Rebecca Parten, Heidi Haapala, Elizabeth S Langen, Sara A S Rosenblum, Svati Pazhyanur, Susan Carlson, Maryam Berri, Susan D Ernst","doi":"10.1177/17455057251338424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women with disabilities have a similar desire for pregnancy as their non-disabled peers but experience more ambivalence and doubt about their intention to have a child. While many have healthy pregnancies, they face higher risks and trade-offs in health, function, and independence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review the literature on pregnancy in women with physical disabilities to guide interventions and clinical care guidelines.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Abstracts were reviewed if they were original research on pregnancy involving adult women with physical disabilities. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included, with no restrictions on language or publication year.</p><p><strong>Sources of evidence: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Complete and reference lists of eligible articles.</p><p><strong>Charting methods: </strong>Abstracts were eligible for full-text review if they were (1) original research, (2) in humans, (3) about pregnancy, and (4) involved adult women with physical disabilities. Data were extracted by independent reviewers using Covidence software and assessed with a customized critical appraisal guide.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five major topics characterized 171 reviewed articles: (1) rates of pregnancy, fertility, and termination or loss; (2) pregnancy complications and infant outcomes; (3) effects of pregnancy on physical function disease activity; (4) maternal care; and (5) social and interpersonal dimensions of pregnancy. Most studies were conducted in the Americas and Europe, and high-income countries used a quantitative design and were assessed to have a moderate risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights the need for future research to (1) build a stronger evidence base for tailored maternal care, (2) examine disability discrimination's impact on pregnancy outcomes, (3) develop interventions to reduce disability-related inequities, and (4) improve disability competence among maternal care providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"21 ","pages":"17455057251338424"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057251338424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women with disabilities have a similar desire for pregnancy as their non-disabled peers but experience more ambivalence and doubt about their intention to have a child. While many have healthy pregnancies, they face higher risks and trade-offs in health, function, and independence.

Objectives: To review the literature on pregnancy in women with physical disabilities to guide interventions and clinical care guidelines.

Eligibility criteria: Abstracts were reviewed if they were original research on pregnancy involving adult women with physical disabilities. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included, with no restrictions on language or publication year.

Sources of evidence: PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL Complete and reference lists of eligible articles.

Charting methods: Abstracts were eligible for full-text review if they were (1) original research, (2) in humans, (3) about pregnancy, and (4) involved adult women with physical disabilities. Data were extracted by independent reviewers using Covidence software and assessed with a customized critical appraisal guide.

Results: Five major topics characterized 171 reviewed articles: (1) rates of pregnancy, fertility, and termination or loss; (2) pregnancy complications and infant outcomes; (3) effects of pregnancy on physical function disease activity; (4) maternal care; and (5) social and interpersonal dimensions of pregnancy. Most studies were conducted in the Americas and Europe, and high-income countries used a quantitative design and were assessed to have a moderate risk of bias.

Conclusions: This review highlights the need for future research to (1) build a stronger evidence base for tailored maternal care, (2) examine disability discrimination's impact on pregnancy outcomes, (3) develop interventions to reduce disability-related inequities, and (4) improve disability competence among maternal care providers.

妊娠与身体残疾:范围综述。
背景:残疾女性与非残疾女性有相似的怀孕愿望,但对自己要孩子的意愿有更多的矛盾心理和怀疑。虽然许多人都有健康的怀孕,但她们在健康、功能和独立性方面面临着更高的风险和权衡。目的:回顾有关身体残疾妇女妊娠的文献,以指导干预措施和临床护理指南。入选标准:对涉及身体残疾成年妇女妊娠的原始研究摘要进行综述。定性和定量研究都包括在内,没有语言或出版年份的限制。证据来源:PubMed, Scopus和CINAHL完整的符合条件的文章和参考文献列表。图表方法:如果摘要符合以下条件,则有资格进行全文审查:(1)原始研究,(2)人类,(3)关于怀孕,(4)涉及身体残疾的成年女性。数据由独立审稿人使用covid - ence软件提取,并使用定制的关键评估指南进行评估。结果:171篇综述文章的五个主要主题:(1)怀孕率、生育率、终止或流产;(2)妊娠并发症和婴儿结局;(3)妊娠对身体机能疾病活动的影响;(4)孕产妇保健;(5)怀孕的社会和人际关系维度。大多数研究是在美洲和欧洲进行的,高收入国家采用了定量设计,并被评估为有中等偏倚风险。结论:本综述强调了未来的研究需要:(1)为量身定制的孕产妇保健建立更强有力的证据基础,(2)研究残疾歧视对妊娠结局的影响,(3)制定干预措施以减少与残疾相关的不平等,(4)提高孕产妇保健提供者的残疾能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信