Legal and ethical implications of AI-based crowd analysis: the AI Act and beyond.

AI and ethics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1007/s43681-024-00644-x
Emmeke Veltmeijer, Charlotte Gerritsen
{"title":"Legal and ethical implications of AI-based crowd analysis: the AI Act and beyond.","authors":"Emmeke Veltmeijer, Charlotte Gerritsen","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00644-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing global population and the consequent rise in crowded environments have amplified the risks of accidents and tragedies. This underscores the need for effective crowd management strategies, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) holding potential to complement traditional methods. While AI offers promise in analysing crowd dynamics and predicting escalations, its deployment raises significant ethical concerns, regarding privacy, bias, accuracy, and accountability. This paper investigates the legal and ethical implications of AI in automated crowd analysis, with a focus on the European perspective. We examine the effect of the GDPR and the recently accepted AI Act on the field. The study then delves into remaining concerns post-legislation and proposes recommendations for ethical deployment. Key findings highlight challenges in notifying individuals of data usage, protecting vulnerable groups, balancing privacy with safety, and mitigating biased outcomes. Recommendations advocate for non-invasive data collection methods, refraining from predicting and decision-making AI systems, contextual considerations, and individual responsibility. The recommendations offer a foundational framework for ethical AI deployment, with universal applicability to benefit citizens globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 3","pages":"3173-3183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00644-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing global population and the consequent rise in crowded environments have amplified the risks of accidents and tragedies. This underscores the need for effective crowd management strategies, with Artificial Intelligence (AI) holding potential to complement traditional methods. While AI offers promise in analysing crowd dynamics and predicting escalations, its deployment raises significant ethical concerns, regarding privacy, bias, accuracy, and accountability. This paper investigates the legal and ethical implications of AI in automated crowd analysis, with a focus on the European perspective. We examine the effect of the GDPR and the recently accepted AI Act on the field. The study then delves into remaining concerns post-legislation and proposes recommendations for ethical deployment. Key findings highlight challenges in notifying individuals of data usage, protecting vulnerable groups, balancing privacy with safety, and mitigating biased outcomes. Recommendations advocate for non-invasive data collection methods, refraining from predicting and decision-making AI systems, contextual considerations, and individual responsibility. The recommendations offer a foundational framework for ethical AI deployment, with universal applicability to benefit citizens globally.

基于人工智能的人群分析的法律和伦理影响:人工智能法案及以后。
全球人口的增加以及随之而来的拥挤环境的增加,加大了发生事故和悲剧的风险。这强调了有效的人群管理策略的必要性,人工智能(AI)具有补充传统方法的潜力。虽然人工智能在分析人群动态和预测升级方面提供了希望,但它的部署引发了重大的道德问题,涉及隐私、偏见、准确性和问责制。本文研究了人工智能在自动人群分析中的法律和伦理影响,重点是欧洲的视角。我们研究了GDPR和最近接受的人工智能法案在该领域的影响。然后,该研究深入研究立法后遗留的问题,并提出道德部署的建议。主要调查结果强调了在通知个人数据使用情况、保护弱势群体、平衡隐私与安全以及减轻有偏见的结果方面面临的挑战。建议提倡非侵入性数据收集方法,避免预测和决策人工智能系统,上下文考虑和个人责任。这些建议为人工智能的道德部署提供了一个基本框架,具有普遍适用性,使全球公民受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信