"The Very Best That It Could Be and a Lot Better Than I Would Have Imagined": Birthing People's Experiences of Transfer From Community to Hospital.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Carrie Neerland, Arielle Skalisky, Robyn Schafer
{"title":"\"The Very Best That It Could Be and a Lot Better Than I Would Have Imagined\": Birthing People's Experiences of Transfer From Community to Hospital.","authors":"Carrie Neerland, Arielle Skalisky, Robyn Schafer","doi":"10.1111/birt.12920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community births (those in homes or freestanding birth centers) are increasing in the US, although they still represent a small percentage of total births. Research shows that community births can offer positive outcomes for low-risk individuals, such as fewer interventions and greater satisfaction. However, when perinatal complications arise, transfer to hospital can result in negative care outcomes and experiences. Effective integration of care and respectful communication between community and hospital providers during transfers are crucial for improving quality care measures. This study aimed to investigate the experiences and outcomes of individuals transferring from community settings to an urban US hospital with established transfer guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-method study, utilizing descriptive statistics and a grounded theory approach, explores the outcomes and experiences of individuals transferring from planned home or birth center births to hospital care for intrapartum management from August 2019 to August 2020. We included participants who were 18 or older, English-speaking, and had experienced a live birth following transfer from home or birth center to hospital. Quantitative outcomes were obtained through chart review. Qualitative interviews were conducted within 6 weeks post-birth, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using constant comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 82 individuals transferred during the study period, with 23 participating in qualitative interviews, we identified 5 major themes: seamless transfer, teamwork, respectful care, changing expectations, and a complex relationship with autonomy and decision-making. Participants valued smooth communication, midwife-to-midwife transfer of care, and the balance between autonomy and reliance on provider recommendations during transfers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Understanding the experiences of those who transfer from community settings to hospitals is crucial for improving perinatal care. With established guidelines for transfer in place to facilitate collaboration across care providers and birth settings, transfers can be managed effectively, resulting in respectful experiences of care with positive health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community births (those in homes or freestanding birth centers) are increasing in the US, although they still represent a small percentage of total births. Research shows that community births can offer positive outcomes for low-risk individuals, such as fewer interventions and greater satisfaction. However, when perinatal complications arise, transfer to hospital can result in negative care outcomes and experiences. Effective integration of care and respectful communication between community and hospital providers during transfers are crucial for improving quality care measures. This study aimed to investigate the experiences and outcomes of individuals transferring from community settings to an urban US hospital with established transfer guidelines.

Methods: This multi-method study, utilizing descriptive statistics and a grounded theory approach, explores the outcomes and experiences of individuals transferring from planned home or birth center births to hospital care for intrapartum management from August 2019 to August 2020. We included participants who were 18 or older, English-speaking, and had experienced a live birth following transfer from home or birth center to hospital. Quantitative outcomes were obtained through chart review. Qualitative interviews were conducted within 6 weeks post-birth, recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using constant comparative analysis.

Results: A total of 82 individuals transferred during the study period, with 23 participating in qualitative interviews, we identified 5 major themes: seamless transfer, teamwork, respectful care, changing expectations, and a complex relationship with autonomy and decision-making. Participants valued smooth communication, midwife-to-midwife transfer of care, and the balance between autonomy and reliance on provider recommendations during transfers.

Discussion: Understanding the experiences of those who transfer from community settings to hospitals is crucial for improving perinatal care. With established guidelines for transfer in place to facilitate collaboration across care providers and birth settings, transfers can be managed effectively, resulting in respectful experiences of care with positive health outcomes.

“最好的,比我想象的要好得多”:分娩人员从社区转到医院的经历。
背景:在美国,社区出生(那些在家里或独立的生育中心出生的人)正在增加,尽管他们仍然只占总出生人数的一小部分。研究表明,社区分娩可以为低风险个体提供积极的结果,例如更少的干预和更高的满意度。然而,当围产期并发症出现时,转到医院可能会导致负面的护理结果和经历。在转院期间,社区和医院提供者之间有效整合护理和相互尊重的沟通对于改善优质护理措施至关重要。本研究旨在调查有既定转院指南的个人从社区转到美国城市医院的经历和结果。方法:本研究采用描述性统计和基于理论的方法,探讨2019年8月至2020年8月从计划生育的家庭或生育中心转移到医院进行分娩管理的结果和经验。我们纳入了年满18岁、会说英语、经历过从家庭或分娩中心转移到医院后的活产的参与者。通过图表回顾获得定量结果。在出生后6周内进行定性访谈,记录,转录,并使用持续比较分析进行分析。结果:研究期间共转移了82名个体,其中23人参与了定性访谈,我们确定了5个主要主题:无缝转移,团队合作,尊重关怀,变化的期望以及自主和决策的复杂关系。参与者重视顺畅的沟通,助产士到助产士的护理转移,以及在转移过程中自主和依赖提供者建议之间的平衡。讨论:了解那些从社区转到医院的人的经历对改善围产期护理至关重要。有了既定的转诊指导方针,以促进护理提供者和分娩机构之间的协作,就可以有效地管理转诊,从而产生相互尊重的护理体验,并产生积极的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信