De-escalating first-line treatment in stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer: outcomes of immunotherapy alone and systemic review.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2025-05-08 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyaf096
Akram Saad, Alexandra Taylor, Shira Felder, Limor Helpman, Smadar Bauer, Ronnie Shapira, Keren Levanon, Jacob Korach, Ronza Atamneh, Samantha Breslauer, Jeffrey Goldstein, Shira Peleg Hasson
{"title":"De-escalating first-line treatment in stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer: outcomes of immunotherapy alone and systemic review.","authors":"Akram Saad, Alexandra Taylor, Shira Felder, Limor Helpman, Smadar Bauer, Ronnie Shapira, Keren Levanon, Jacob Korach, Ronza Atamneh, Samantha Breslauer, Jeffrey Goldstein, Shira Peleg Hasson","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chemo-immunotherapy (IO) is the preferred first-line treatment for stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer. However, limited data exist on the efficacy and safety of using IO-alone as a de-escalation strategy. We report outcomes from a case series of selected patients treated with IO-alone and review the feasibility of de-escalating first-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a literature review using Google Scholar and PubMed to identify reports using IO-alone as a de-escalation strategy across malignancies published between 1999 and December 2024 and also reviewed a cervical cancer database from a tertiary academic to identify patients with stage IVB or recurrent disease treated with IO-alone. The authors used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 582 patients treated between 2015 and 2021, 18 met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 43 years (range 28-84); 67% had squamous cell carcinoma, 11% adenocarcinoma, and 80% expressed PD-L1. CPS scores were <1 in 20%, 1--10 in 33%, and >10 in 47%. Most patients had oligo-metastatic disease (83%). Treatment with IO-alone began a median of 7 months after platinum-based chemotherapy. Indications included prior adjuvant (44%) or neoadjuvant (22%) chemotherapy, clinical trial participation (11%), or patient preference (22%). Median PFS and OS were 27 months and 82 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support the need for clinical trials evaluating IO-alone as a first-line treatment option for de-escalation in stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer. Biomarker development is needed to better identify candidates for personalized therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chemo-immunotherapy (IO) is the preferred first-line treatment for stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer. However, limited data exist on the efficacy and safety of using IO-alone as a de-escalation strategy. We report outcomes from a case series of selected patients treated with IO-alone and review the feasibility of de-escalating first-line treatment.

Methods: The authors conducted a literature review using Google Scholar and PubMed to identify reports using IO-alone as a de-escalation strategy across malignancies published between 1999 and December 2024 and also reviewed a cervical cancer database from a tertiary academic to identify patients with stage IVB or recurrent disease treated with IO-alone. The authors used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: Among 582 patients treated between 2015 and 2021, 18 met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 43 years (range 28-84); 67% had squamous cell carcinoma, 11% adenocarcinoma, and 80% expressed PD-L1. CPS scores were <1 in 20%, 1--10 in 33%, and >10 in 47%. Most patients had oligo-metastatic disease (83%). Treatment with IO-alone began a median of 7 months after platinum-based chemotherapy. Indications included prior adjuvant (44%) or neoadjuvant (22%) chemotherapy, clinical trial participation (11%), or patient preference (22%). Median PFS and OS were 27 months and 82 months, respectively.

Conclusions: These findings support the need for clinical trials evaluating IO-alone as a first-line treatment option for de-escalation in stage IVB or recurrent cervical cancer. Biomarker development is needed to better identify candidates for personalized therapy.

降低IVB期或复发宫颈癌的一线治疗:单独免疫治疗和系统评价的结果。
化疗免疫治疗(IO)是IVB期或复发性宫颈癌的首选一线治疗。然而,关于单独使用io作为降级策略的有效性和安全性的数据有限。我们报告了一系列病例的结果,这些患者选择单独使用io治疗,并回顾了降低一线治疗的可行性。方法:作者使用谷歌Scholar和PubMed进行了文献综述,以确定1999年至2024年12月期间发表的使用单用io作为恶性肿瘤降级策略的报告,并审查了来自三级学术机构的宫颈癌数据库,以确定IVB期或单用io治疗的复发性疾病患者。作者使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:在2015年至2021年期间接受治疗的582例患者中,有18例符合纳入标准。中位年龄为43岁(28-84岁);67%为鳞状细胞癌,11%为腺癌,80%表达PD-L1。CPS分数为10分,占47%。大多数患者有低转移性疾病(83%)。以铂为基础的化疗后中位时间为7个月,开始单用io治疗。适应症包括先前辅助化疗(44%)或新辅助化疗(22%)、临床试验参与(11%)或患者偏好(22%)。中位PFS和OS分别为27个月和82个月。结论:这些发现支持有必要进行临床试验,评估单独使用io作为IVB期或复发性宫颈癌降级的一线治疗选择。需要生物标志物的发展来更好地识别个性化治疗的候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信