Attrition from Pediatric Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: Utilizing the "Paediatric Electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (PaedePPOC) Database".

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kristen Tiong, Andrew Gorrie, Greta M Palmer, David Sainsbury, Tiina Jaaniste
{"title":"Attrition from Pediatric Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Clinics: Utilizing the \"Paediatric Electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (PaedePPOC) Database\".","authors":"Kristen Tiong, Andrew Gorrie, Greta M Palmer, David Sainsbury, Tiina Jaaniste","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Attrition from pediatric chronic pain clinics limits patients from receiving maximum benefit from evidence-based interventions, with likely persistence of chronic pain, functional and psychosocial impairments. We aimed to determine attrition prevalence from interdisciplinary pediatric outpatient chronic pain clinics and identify any associated patient and caregiver factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed of longitudinal data from patients and caregivers attending 10 interdisciplinary pediatric outpatient chronic pain clinics in Australia or New Zealand contributing to the Paediatric electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (PaedePPOC) database. Data was retrieved for patient attrition, patient and caregiver factors at treatment commencement and subsequent documentation of the episode end for treatment completers and non-completers. Statistical associations with patient attrition were assessed using logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of patient attrition was 19.3% in the PaedePPOC cohort (N=1051), occurring steadily over 11 months. Patients ending their treatment prematurely presented with longer pain duration (>12 mos) (χ2(1, n=879)=8.23, P=0.004) than treatment completers. In the regression model, only older patient age (P=0.010) and higher caregiver psychosocial burden (P=0.025) at treatment commencement were associated with attrition. While pain intensity, patient physical and psychosocial functioning scores and caregiver partner status were not.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>One in five patients commencing an interdisciplinary pediatric outpatient chronic pain clinic intervention did not complete it. Identifying patients at pre-intervention screening with longer pain duration, older in age and from families with greater reported caregiver burden and providing tailored supports may minimize attrition, therefore optimizing efficiency of service provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Attrition from pediatric chronic pain clinics limits patients from receiving maximum benefit from evidence-based interventions, with likely persistence of chronic pain, functional and psychosocial impairments. We aimed to determine attrition prevalence from interdisciplinary pediatric outpatient chronic pain clinics and identify any associated patient and caregiver factors.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of longitudinal data from patients and caregivers attending 10 interdisciplinary pediatric outpatient chronic pain clinics in Australia or New Zealand contributing to the Paediatric electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (PaedePPOC) database. Data was retrieved for patient attrition, patient and caregiver factors at treatment commencement and subsequent documentation of the episode end for treatment completers and non-completers. Statistical associations with patient attrition were assessed using logistic regression analyses.

Results: The prevalence of patient attrition was 19.3% in the PaedePPOC cohort (N=1051), occurring steadily over 11 months. Patients ending their treatment prematurely presented with longer pain duration (>12 mos) (χ2(1, n=879)=8.23, P=0.004) than treatment completers. In the regression model, only older patient age (P=0.010) and higher caregiver psychosocial burden (P=0.025) at treatment commencement were associated with attrition. While pain intensity, patient physical and psychosocial functioning scores and caregiver partner status were not.

Discussion: One in five patients commencing an interdisciplinary pediatric outpatient chronic pain clinic intervention did not complete it. Identifying patients at pre-intervention screening with longer pain duration, older in age and from families with greater reported caregiver burden and providing tailored supports may minimize attrition, therefore optimizing efficiency of service provision.

来自儿科跨学科慢性疼痛诊所的损耗:利用“儿科电子持续疼痛结果协作(PaedePPOC)数据库”。
目的:儿童慢性疼痛门诊的人员流失限制了患者从循证干预措施中获得最大益处,并且可能持续存在慢性疼痛、功能和心理障碍。我们的目的是确定跨学科儿科门诊慢性疼痛门诊的减员率,并确定任何相关的患者和护理人员因素。方法:回顾性分析来自澳大利亚或新西兰10个跨学科儿科门诊慢性疼痛诊所的患者和护理人员的纵向数据,这些诊所为儿科电子持续疼痛结局协作(PaedePPOC)数据库提供数据。检索了治疗开始时患者减员、患者和护理人员因素的数据,以及治疗完成者和未完成者在治疗结束时的后续记录。使用逻辑回归分析评估与患者磨耗的统计关联。结果:在PaedePPOC队列(N=1051)中,患者磨耗率为19.3%,在11个月内稳定发生。与完成治疗的患者相比,过早结束治疗的患者疼痛持续时间更长(bbb12个月)(χ2(1, n=879)=8.23, P=0.004)。在回归模型中,只有治疗开始时患者年龄较大(P=0.010)和照顾者心理社会负担较高(P=0.025)与减员有关。而疼痛强度、患者身体和社会心理功能评分和照顾者伴侣状态则无关。讨论:五分之一的患者开始跨学科儿科门诊慢性疼痛临床干预没有完成。在干预前筛查中识别疼痛持续时间较长、年龄较大和来自报告照顾者负担较大的家庭的患者,并提供量身定制的支持,可以最大限度地减少人员流失,从而优化服务提供的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信