Evaluating Family Safety Reporting Through an Operational and Research Taxonomy.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kate E Humphrey, Patricia A Stoeck, Brynn Elder, Tiffany Ngo, Jennifer Baird, Rachel K D'Anna, Kathryn P Gray, Helen Haskell, Nandini Mallick, Susan Matherson, Sangeeta Mauskar, Dorothy M Miller, Sara Toomey, Christopher P Landrigan, Alisa Khan
{"title":"Evaluating Family Safety Reporting Through an Operational and Research Taxonomy.","authors":"Kate E Humphrey, Patricia A Stoeck, Brynn Elder, Tiffany Ngo, Jennifer Baird, Rachel K D'Anna, Kathryn P Gray, Helen Haskell, Nandini Mallick, Susan Matherson, Sangeeta Mauskar, Dorothy M Miller, Sara Toomey, Christopher P Landrigan, Alisa Khan","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Integrating family-reported safety data into hospitals' operational safety reporting systems could enrich them, but requires understanding how reports would be classified. We sought to evaluate how family safety reports would be classified in an operational system and compare classifications with a newer research taxonomy.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>We prospectively collected safety reports from English and Spanish-speaking families of children hospitalized in a pediatric quaternary hospital's complex care service. Three physicians scored reports using research (modified Bates and colleagues and NCC-MERP) and operational taxonomies. In total, 10% of reports were reviewed independently to determine interrater reliability [kappa (κ)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 132 families provided 289 reports. Research κ (% agreement) was 0.40 (52.0%) for safety classification and 0.58 (68.0%) for NCC-MERP category. Operational κ was 0.46 (62.5%) for severity. κ for preventability, a shared category across operational and research taxonomies, was 0.53 (76.9%). Using operational taxonomy, reports were commonly classified as medications and fluids (29.8%, n=86), severity level 1 (no harm; 34.6%, n=100), with 34.9% (n=101) deemed unclassifiable. Using research taxonomy, reports were most commonly medicine/IV fluids (36.3%, n=105), nonharmful errors (38.4%, n=111), non-safety-related quality (30.8%, n=89), and NCC-MERP C (29.8%, n=86). 63% (n=182) were possibly preventable/preventable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operational and research taxonomies classify family-reported safety events similarly, though many are nonclassifiable in the operational taxonomy. Research taxonomy characterized family-reported concerns, including quality and environmental hazards, highlighting important aspects that operational systems do not capture. Hospitals and researchers should include family-reported data, and operational systems could add research categories to better capture safety and quality information from families.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Integrating family-reported safety data into hospitals' operational safety reporting systems could enrich them, but requires understanding how reports would be classified. We sought to evaluate how family safety reports would be classified in an operational system and compare classifications with a newer research taxonomy.

Design/methods: We prospectively collected safety reports from English and Spanish-speaking families of children hospitalized in a pediatric quaternary hospital's complex care service. Three physicians scored reports using research (modified Bates and colleagues and NCC-MERP) and operational taxonomies. In total, 10% of reports were reviewed independently to determine interrater reliability [kappa (κ)].

Results: In total, 132 families provided 289 reports. Research κ (% agreement) was 0.40 (52.0%) for safety classification and 0.58 (68.0%) for NCC-MERP category. Operational κ was 0.46 (62.5%) for severity. κ for preventability, a shared category across operational and research taxonomies, was 0.53 (76.9%). Using operational taxonomy, reports were commonly classified as medications and fluids (29.8%, n=86), severity level 1 (no harm; 34.6%, n=100), with 34.9% (n=101) deemed unclassifiable. Using research taxonomy, reports were most commonly medicine/IV fluids (36.3%, n=105), nonharmful errors (38.4%, n=111), non-safety-related quality (30.8%, n=89), and NCC-MERP C (29.8%, n=86). 63% (n=182) were possibly preventable/preventable.

Conclusions: Operational and research taxonomies classify family-reported safety events similarly, though many are nonclassifiable in the operational taxonomy. Research taxonomy characterized family-reported concerns, including quality and environmental hazards, highlighting important aspects that operational systems do not capture. Hospitals and researchers should include family-reported data, and operational systems could add research categories to better capture safety and quality information from families.

通过操作和研究分类评估家庭安全报告。
目的:将家庭报告的安全数据整合到医院的操作安全报告系统中可以丰富它们,但需要了解报告如何分类。我们试图评估如何在操作系统中对家庭安全报告进行分类,并将分类与较新的研究分类进行比较。设计/方法:我们前瞻性地收集某儿科第四医院综合护理服务中住院儿童的英语和西班牙语家庭的安全报告。三位医生使用研究(修改Bates及其同事和NCC-MERP)和操作分类法对报告进行评分。总共有10%的报告被独立审查以确定互信度[kappa (κ)]。结果:132个家庭共提供289份报告。安全分类的研究κ(%一致性)为0.40 (52.0%),NCC-MERP分类的研究κ(%一致性)为0.58(68.0%)。严重程度的Operational κ为0.46(62.5%)。可预防性的κ为0.53(76.9%),是操作和研究分类的共享类别。使用操作分类法,报告通常分为药物和液体(29.8%,n=86),严重程度为1级(无伤害;34.6% (n= 100), 34.9% (n=101)被认为无法分类。使用研究分类法,报告中最常见的是药物/静脉输液(36.3%,n=105)、无害错误(38.4%,n=111)、非安全相关质量(30.8%,n=89)和nc - merp C (29.8%, n=86)。63% (n=182)可能可预防/可预防。结论:操作分类法和研究分类法对家庭报告的安全事件进行相似的分类,尽管许多在操作分类法中是不可分类的。研究分类描述了家庭报告的问题,包括质量和环境危害,突出了操作系统没有捕捉到的重要方面。医院和研究人员应该包括家庭报告的数据,操作系统可以增加研究类别,以便更好地从家庭获取安全和质量信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信