Impact of laparoscopic experience on learning curves in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP): a comparative analysis of oncological and functional outcomes.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Pier Paolo Prontera, Francesca Romana Prusciano, Lattarulo Marco, Arman Tsaturyan, Carmine Sciorio, Francesco Dibenedetto, Lorenzo Romano, Francesco Saverio Grossi
{"title":"Impact of laparoscopic experience on learning curves in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP): a comparative analysis of oncological and functional outcomes.","authors":"Pier Paolo Prontera, Francesca Romana Prusciano, Lattarulo Marco, Arman Tsaturyan, Carmine Sciorio, Francesco Dibenedetto, Lorenzo Romano, Francesco Saverio Grossi","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2025.13640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the influence of prior laparoscopic experience on the learning curve and surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 101 patients treated between 2021 and 2023. Two surgeons at the beginning of their robotic learning curves were compared: one with extensive prior laparoscopic experience and the other without such a background. Perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes were assessed, with a specific focus on Pentafecta criteria. Statistical analyses and cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts were employed to evaluate performance trends and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgeon A, with substantial prior laparoscopic expertise, demonstrated shorter operative times (p = 0.015), reduced intraoperative blood loss, and superior early functional outcomes. Specifically, patients operated on by Surgeon A exhibited higher pad-free continence rates and improved erectile function recovery at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). Additionally, nerve-sparing procedures performed by Surgeon A showed a trend toward fewer positive surgical margins, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. CUSUM analysis revealed more stable and consistent performance trends for Surgeon A in achieving Pentafecta outcomes compared to Surgeon B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Previous laparoscopic experience significantly contributes to shortening the learning curve for RaRP and enhancing early functional outcomes. This advantage is likely attributable to greater surgical anatomical knowledge. These findings highlight the importance of tailored training programs and the potential for skill transfer between laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Further studies are warranted to refine surgical education strategies and improve patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":" ","pages":"13640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.13640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of prior laparoscopic experience on the learning curve and surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RaRP).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 101 patients treated between 2021 and 2023. Two surgeons at the beginning of their robotic learning curves were compared: one with extensive prior laparoscopic experience and the other without such a background. Perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes were assessed, with a specific focus on Pentafecta criteria. Statistical analyses and cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts were employed to evaluate performance trends and surgical outcomes.

Results: Surgeon A, with substantial prior laparoscopic expertise, demonstrated shorter operative times (p = 0.015), reduced intraoperative blood loss, and superior early functional outcomes. Specifically, patients operated on by Surgeon A exhibited higher pad-free continence rates and improved erectile function recovery at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.01). Additionally, nerve-sparing procedures performed by Surgeon A showed a trend toward fewer positive surgical margins, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. CUSUM analysis revealed more stable and consistent performance trends for Surgeon A in achieving Pentafecta outcomes compared to Surgeon B.

Conclusions: Previous laparoscopic experience significantly contributes to shortening the learning curve for RaRP and enhancing early functional outcomes. This advantage is likely attributable to greater surgical anatomical knowledge. These findings highlight the importance of tailored training programs and the potential for skill transfer between laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Further studies are warranted to refine surgical education strategies and improve patient care outcomes.

腹腔镜经验对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RaRP)学习曲线的影响:肿瘤和功能结果的比较分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估先前腹腔镜经验对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RaRP)的学习曲线和手术效果的影响。方法:对2021 ~ 2023年间101例患者进行回顾性分析。两名外科医生在机器人学习曲线开始时进行了比较:一名有丰富的腹腔镜经验,另一名没有这样的背景。评估围手术期、肿瘤和功能结果,特别关注Pentafecta标准。采用统计分析和累积和(CUSUM)图表来评估表现趋势和手术结果。结果:外科医生A先前具有丰富的腹腔镜专业知识,表现出更短的手术时间(p = 0.015),术中出血量减少,早期功能预后优越。具体而言,A外科医生手术的患者术后12个月无尿失禁率更高,勃起功能恢复改善(p < 0.01)。此外,外科医生A进行的神经保留手术显示出阳性手术切缘较少的趋势,尽管这种差异没有达到统计学意义。CUSUM分析显示,与外科医生b相比,外科医生A在实现Pentafecta结果方面的表现趋势更加稳定和一致。结论:以往的腹腔镜经验显著有助于缩短RaRP的学习曲线,提高早期功能结果。这种优势可能归因于更多的外科解剖学知识。这些发现强调了量身定制的培训计划的重要性,以及腹腔镜和机器人方法之间技能转移的潜力。进一步的研究是必要的,以完善外科教育策略和改善病人的护理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信