Extra-anatomical urinary diversion for malignant ureteric obstruction: our clinical experience.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Napoleon Moulavasilis, Konstantinos Douroumis, Konstantinos Kotrotsios, Periklis Anastasiou, Panagiotis Levis, Evangelos Fragkiadis, Ioannis Anastasiou
{"title":"Extra-anatomical urinary diversion for malignant ureteric obstruction: our clinical experience.","authors":"Napoleon Moulavasilis, Konstantinos Douroumis, Konstantinos Kotrotsios, Periklis Anastasiou, Panagiotis Levis, Evangelos Fragkiadis, Ioannis Anastasiou","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2025.13869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Ureteral stenosis and upper urinary tract obstruction present significant clinical challenges, especially in cases involving complex, long strictures. Traditional management options like ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes often result in complications and diminished quality of life. Extra-anatomical urinary diversion (EAUD) offers an alternative approach, particularly for oncologic patients requiring palliative care.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2015 to 2019, eight patients with cancer-related ureteral strictures underwent EAUD. In all patients cancer-specific prognosis exceeded one year. The procedure was performed using a standard surgical technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 62.5 years, ranging from 22 to 82 years. The mean follow-up duration was 62.8 months. Improvement in renal function was observed in some patients, while the early complication rate was 62.5%. Notable complications included infections and encrustation of the prosthesis. Two patients experienced multiple infections of the overlying skin and soft tissue necessitated the dislodgement of the prothesis after 38 and 101 months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extra-anatomical stent placement constitutes a somewhat effective and safe option in the context of complex ureteral obstruction management in oncologic patients. The lack of external devices and its longer duration without the need for substitution compared with conventional double J stents can theoretically assure a better quality of life. However, a careful patient selection is needed in order to maximize the patients' benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":" ","pages":"13869"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2025.13869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Ureteral stenosis and upper urinary tract obstruction present significant clinical challenges, especially in cases involving complex, long strictures. Traditional management options like ureteral stents and percutaneous nephrostomy tubes often result in complications and diminished quality of life. Extra-anatomical urinary diversion (EAUD) offers an alternative approach, particularly for oncologic patients requiring palliative care.

Materials and methods: From 2015 to 2019, eight patients with cancer-related ureteral strictures underwent EAUD. In all patients cancer-specific prognosis exceeded one year. The procedure was performed using a standard surgical technique.

Results: The mean patient age was 62.5 years, ranging from 22 to 82 years. The mean follow-up duration was 62.8 months. Improvement in renal function was observed in some patients, while the early complication rate was 62.5%. Notable complications included infections and encrustation of the prosthesis. Two patients experienced multiple infections of the overlying skin and soft tissue necessitated the dislodgement of the prothesis after 38 and 101 months, respectively.

Conclusions: Extra-anatomical stent placement constitutes a somewhat effective and safe option in the context of complex ureteral obstruction management in oncologic patients. The lack of external devices and its longer duration without the need for substitution compared with conventional double J stents can theoretically assure a better quality of life. However, a careful patient selection is needed in order to maximize the patients' benefit.

解剖外导尿管转移治疗恶性输尿管梗阻的临床经验。
导读和目的:输尿管狭窄和上尿路梗阻是临床面临的重大挑战,特别是涉及复杂、长狭窄的病例。传统的治疗方法如输尿管支架和经皮肾造口管经常导致并发症和生活质量下降。解剖外尿分流(EAUD)提供了另一种方法,特别是对需要姑息治疗的肿瘤患者。材料与方法:2015 - 2019年,对8例肿瘤相关性输尿管狭窄患者行EAUD治疗。所有患者癌症特异性预后均超过1年。手术采用标准手术技术。结果:患者平均年龄62.5岁,年龄22 ~ 82岁。平均随访时间为62.8个月。部分患者肾功能改善,早期并发症发生率为62.5%。明显的并发症包括假体感染和结痂。2例患者分别在38个月和101个月后出现复盖皮肤和软组织的多次感染,需要进行假体脱位。结论:在肿瘤患者复杂输尿管梗阻的治疗中,解剖外支架置入术是一种有效且安全的选择。与传统的双J型支架相比,缺乏外部装置和更长的不需要替代的持续时间理论上可以保证更好的生活质量。然而,为了使患者的利益最大化,需要仔细选择患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信