Time to classify: a narrative and scoping review of the old and the new classifications of perianal Crohn's disease.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
T Pelly, E Anand, L Hanna, E Shakweh, S Joshi, P Lung, A Hart, P Tozer
{"title":"Time to classify: a narrative and scoping review of the old and the new classifications of perianal Crohn's disease.","authors":"T Pelly, E Anand, L Hanna, E Shakweh, S Joshi, P Lung, A Hart, P Tozer","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03161-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) is a complex manifestation of Crohn's disease. Classifying this patient cohort for both clinical purposes and for inclusion into research trials is challenging but crucial in order to improve outcomes. This review provides an overview of historical classifications of both fistulising and non-fistulising pCD, including the Park's, Cardiff-Hughes and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) classifications, as well as recent advances including the Treatment Optimisation and CLASSification of perianal Crohn's disease (TOpClass) classification of fistulising pCD. Secondly, this article provides a scoping review of recent trials in pCD and describes how the cohorts in these trials relate to the TOpClass classification. Of the 19 studies relating to pCD that were identified, four could be confidently classified as class 2a. Seven could be classified as class 2a or 2b, but it was not possible to subdivide further, and seven to class 2a, 2b or 2c, but it was not possible to subdivide further. One study population was classified as class 2a or 2c. In eight studies, it was not specified whether patients with a defunctioning stoma were included or excluded. This review demonstrates the heterogeneous nature of some patient cohorts in previous clinical trials, and how the TOpClass classification may be used to group patients more accurately for clinical use and inclusion in research trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03161-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) is a complex manifestation of Crohn's disease. Classifying this patient cohort for both clinical purposes and for inclusion into research trials is challenging but crucial in order to improve outcomes. This review provides an overview of historical classifications of both fistulising and non-fistulising pCD, including the Park's, Cardiff-Hughes and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) classifications, as well as recent advances including the Treatment Optimisation and CLASSification of perianal Crohn's disease (TOpClass) classification of fistulising pCD. Secondly, this article provides a scoping review of recent trials in pCD and describes how the cohorts in these trials relate to the TOpClass classification. Of the 19 studies relating to pCD that were identified, four could be confidently classified as class 2a. Seven could be classified as class 2a or 2b, but it was not possible to subdivide further, and seven to class 2a, 2b or 2c, but it was not possible to subdivide further. One study population was classified as class 2a or 2c. In eight studies, it was not specified whether patients with a defunctioning stoma were included or excluded. This review demonstrates the heterogeneous nature of some patient cohorts in previous clinical trials, and how the TOpClass classification may be used to group patients more accurately for clinical use and inclusion in research trials.

时间分类:叙述和范围审查旧的和新的分类肛周克罗恩病。
肛周克罗恩病(pCD)是克罗恩病的一种复杂表现。为临床目的和纳入研究试验对该患者队列进行分类具有挑战性,但对于改善结果至关重要。本文综述了瘘管性和非瘘管性pCD的历史分类,包括Park、Cardiff-Hughes和美国胃肠病学协会(AGA)的分类,以及最近的进展,包括瘘管性pCD的治疗优化和肛周克罗恩病分类(TOpClass)分类。其次,本文提供了近期pCD试验的范围综述,并描述了这些试验中的队列如何与TOpClass分类相关。在已确定的19项与pCD相关的研究中,有4项可以自信地归类为2a类。7个可以归为2a或2b类,但不能再细分;7个归为2a、2b或2c类,但不能再细分。一个研究人群被归类为2a或2c类。在8项研究中,没有明确是否包括或排除患有功能性造口的患者。这篇综述展示了以往临床试验中一些患者队列的异质性,以及如何使用TOpClass分类更准确地将患者分组,以便临床使用和纳入研究试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信