Patient satisfaction and ease of use of a novel method for electronic administration of validated quality of life questionnaires.

IF 0.5 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zdeněk Rušavý, Martin Smažinka, Martin Havíř, Vladimír Kališ
{"title":"Patient satisfaction and ease of use of a novel method for electronic administration of validated quality of life questionnaires.","authors":"Zdeněk Rušavý, Martin Smažinka, Martin Havíř, Vladimír Kališ","doi":"10.48095/cccg2025149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of the quality of life using validated measures is an essential part of urogynecology examination and follow-up. Questionnaires administered in paper form generate paper waste or high demands for storage. Score calculation for some questionnaires may be demanding and time-consuming. The electronic format of completing questionnaires simplifies data collection and processing, but may be challenging for older patients. We developed a Medical Electronic Survey System (MESS), which facilitates completion of questionnaires on a tablet PC with an emphasis on data protection and user-friendliness for the elderly.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare patient satisfaction and ease of use between Google Forms and MESS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study comparing the answers to a satisfaction questionnaire completed using Google Forms (193 questionnaires between 2013-2015) and MESS (329 questionnaires between 2019-2020), along with other clinically used validated questionnaires. The answers to the questionnaire were compared using a Fisher's Exact Test or a Wilcoxon Two Sample test, with a significance level of P &lt; 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The electronic form of questionnaire completion suited more women in case of MESS (84.5 vs. 65.6%; P &lt; 0.05). Completing questionnaires electronically was rated as easy or very easy by 89.1% of patients using MESS compared to 68.7% using Google Forms; P &lt; 0.05. The electronic form of filling-in the questionnaires was very difficult or impossible especially for women using Google Forms (31 vs. 11%; P &lt; 0.05). The major difference in questionnaire completion without any help was observed in the age group 60-69 years. No differences were observed in women under 60 years of age. All clinicians observed significant facilitation of their work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MESS has made the method of electronic questionnaire completion available even to elderly patients with pelvic floor disorders. It was positively accepted even by patients who are not familiar with any electronic devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"90 2","pages":"149-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2025149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of the quality of life using validated measures is an essential part of urogynecology examination and follow-up. Questionnaires administered in paper form generate paper waste or high demands for storage. Score calculation for some questionnaires may be demanding and time-consuming. The electronic format of completing questionnaires simplifies data collection and processing, but may be challenging for older patients. We developed a Medical Electronic Survey System (MESS), which facilitates completion of questionnaires on a tablet PC with an emphasis on data protection and user-friendliness for the elderly.

Objective: To compare patient satisfaction and ease of use between Google Forms and MESS.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study comparing the answers to a satisfaction questionnaire completed using Google Forms (193 questionnaires between 2013-2015) and MESS (329 questionnaires between 2019-2020), along with other clinically used validated questionnaires. The answers to the questionnaire were compared using a Fisher's Exact Test or a Wilcoxon Two Sample test, with a significance level of P < 0.05.

Results: The electronic form of questionnaire completion suited more women in case of MESS (84.5 vs. 65.6%; P < 0.05). Completing questionnaires electronically was rated as easy or very easy by 89.1% of patients using MESS compared to 68.7% using Google Forms; P < 0.05. The electronic form of filling-in the questionnaires was very difficult or impossible especially for women using Google Forms (31 vs. 11%; P < 0.05). The major difference in questionnaire completion without any help was observed in the age group 60-69 years. No differences were observed in women under 60 years of age. All clinicians observed significant facilitation of their work.

Conclusion: MESS has made the method of electronic questionnaire completion available even to elderly patients with pelvic floor disorders. It was positively accepted even by patients who are not familiar with any electronic devices.

患者满意度和易于使用的一种新的方法,电子管理验证的生活质量问卷。
背景:使用有效的测量方法评估生活质量是泌尿妇科检查和随访的重要组成部分。以纸质形式管理的问卷会产生纸张浪费或对存储的要求很高。一些问卷的得分计算可能要求很高,而且很耗时。填写问卷的电子格式简化了数据收集和处理,但对老年患者可能具有挑战性。我们开发了一套医疗电子调查系统(MESS),方便在平板电脑上填写问卷,重点是保护资料和方便长者使用。目的:比较谷歌表单与MESS表单的患者满意度和易用性。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,比较了使用谷歌表格(2013-2015年期间有193份问卷)和MESS(2019-2020年期间有329份问卷)完成的满意度问卷的答案,以及其他临床使用的验证问卷。问卷的答案采用Fisher精确检验或Wilcoxon双样本检验进行比较,显著性水平为P <;0.05.结果:电子问卷形式更适合女性患者(84.5% vs. 65.6%;P & lt;0.05)。89.1%的使用MESS的患者认为电子填写问卷容易或非常容易,而68.7%的使用谷歌表单的患者认为电子填写问卷容易或非常容易;P & lt;0.05. 电子表格填写问卷非常困难或不可能,特别是对于使用谷歌表格的女性(31%对11%;P & lt;0.05)。在没有任何帮助的情况下完成问卷的主要差异在60-69岁年龄组中观察到。在60岁以下的女性中没有观察到差异。所有临床医生都观察到他们工作的显著便利性。结论:MESS为老年盆底疾病患者提供了电子问卷的填写方法。即使是不熟悉任何电子设备的患者也积极地接受了它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信