Medications for Managing Central Neuropathic Pain as a Result of Underlying Conditions-A Systematic Review.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bjarke Kaae Houlind, Henrik Boye Jensen
{"title":"Medications for Managing Central Neuropathic Pain as a Result of Underlying Conditions-A Systematic Review.","authors":"Bjarke Kaae Houlind, Henrik Boye Jensen","doi":"10.3390/neurolint17050077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This systematic review assessed the current literature regarding the analgesic treatment of central neuropathic pain (CNP) in central nervous system (CNS) conditions, such as spinal cord injuries, multiple sclerosis, post-stroke disorders, and Parkinson's disease. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the current algorithmic treatment of CNP, which generally does not discriminate among underlying conditions, with RCTs investigating algorithm-recommended and non-algorithm-recommended drugs for differing underlying conditions. <b>Methods</b>: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were used to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs). MeSH terms and EmTree terms were searched as well as free text words in the title/abstract of the studies. A risk of bias tool was used to assess all included studies. <b>Results</b>: A total of 903 RCTs were identified from the initial search. Thirty-eight RCTs published between January 2002 and November 2024 fulfilled all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The review investigated progressive and stable neurological diseases and conditions with associated CNP. <b>Conclusions</b>: From the majority of the included studies, the current recommended treatment algorithm seems to be effective and safe; however, the underlying condition seems to influence how the patient responds to tier-appropriate medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12114137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17050077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review assessed the current literature regarding the analgesic treatment of central neuropathic pain (CNP) in central nervous system (CNS) conditions, such as spinal cord injuries, multiple sclerosis, post-stroke disorders, and Parkinson's disease. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the current algorithmic treatment of CNP, which generally does not discriminate among underlying conditions, with RCTs investigating algorithm-recommended and non-algorithm-recommended drugs for differing underlying conditions. Methods: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were used to identify relevant randomized control trials (RCTs). MeSH terms and EmTree terms were searched as well as free text words in the title/abstract of the studies. A risk of bias tool was used to assess all included studies. Results: A total of 903 RCTs were identified from the initial search. Thirty-eight RCTs published between January 2002 and November 2024 fulfilled all the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria. The review investigated progressive and stable neurological diseases and conditions with associated CNP. Conclusions: From the majority of the included studies, the current recommended treatment algorithm seems to be effective and safe; however, the underlying condition seems to influence how the patient responds to tier-appropriate medication.

治疗中枢神经性疼痛的药物作为潜在条件的结果-系统综述。
背景:本系统综述评估了目前有关中枢神经系统(CNS)疾病(如脊髓损伤、多发性硬化症、脑卒中后疾病和帕金森病)中中枢神经性疼痛(CNP)镇痛治疗的文献。本系统综述的目的是比较目前CNP的算法治疗(通常不区分潜在疾病)与随机对照试验,研究针对不同潜在疾病的算法推荐和非算法推荐药物。方法:使用PubMed和EMBASE数据库筛选相关的随机对照试验(rct)。检索MeSH术语和EmTree术语以及研究标题/摘要中的自由文本词。使用偏倚风险工具评估所有纳入的研究。结果:从最初的检索中共确定了903项rct。2002年1月至2024年11月发表的38项随机对照试验符合所有纳入标准,未满足任何排除标准。本综述调查了与CNP相关的进行性和稳定性神经系统疾病和病症。结论:从大多数纳入的研究来看,目前推荐的治疗方案似乎是有效和安全的;然而,潜在的条件似乎会影响患者对适当的药物治疗的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信