Impact of Clinical Skills Laboratory Training and Online Education on Suture Skill Development in Veterinary Students: A Gender-Based Analysis.

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Caner Bakıcı, Mücahit Ali Büyükarslan, Merve Bakıcı, Barış Batur, Doğukan Özen, Sinan Şahin, İbrahim Alp Sarıtaş
{"title":"Impact of Clinical Skills Laboratory Training and Online Education on Suture Skill Development in Veterinary Students: A Gender-Based Analysis.","authors":"Caner Bakıcı, Mücahit Ali Büyükarslan, Merve Bakıcı, Barış Batur, Doğukan Özen, Sinan Şahin, İbrahim Alp Sarıtaş","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2024-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acquisition of clinical skills is a fundamental component of veterinary education, necessitating effective instructional methods that balance theoretical knowledge and practical application. Although this study primarily aimed to assess the effectiveness of clinical skills laboratory (CSL) training in skill development of first-year veterinary students, an emerging observation was the gender-based differences in skills acquisition and improvement. Given the limited existing research on this aspect, these findings contribute to the understanding of potential gender-related learning variations in surgical training. In this prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial, 140 first-year veterinary students were tasked with basic suturing exercises. Performance scores demonstrated improvement across all assessed skills, with notable gains in suturing proficiency following CSL training. Students who participated in hands-on practice achieved significantly higher posttest scores compared with those who relied solely on online instruction, reinforcing the effectiveness of practical training. Notably, female students in both groups exhibited a statistically higher increase in performance scores than their male counterparts. These findings underscore the importance of practical, model-based training in CSL for fostering skills acquisition and revealed the impact of gender on skill development. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the integration of experiential learning into veterinary education and offers insights into optimizing training methods to enhance student outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":" ","pages":"e20240095"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2024-0095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acquisition of clinical skills is a fundamental component of veterinary education, necessitating effective instructional methods that balance theoretical knowledge and practical application. Although this study primarily aimed to assess the effectiveness of clinical skills laboratory (CSL) training in skill development of first-year veterinary students, an emerging observation was the gender-based differences in skills acquisition and improvement. Given the limited existing research on this aspect, these findings contribute to the understanding of potential gender-related learning variations in surgical training. In this prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial, 140 first-year veterinary students were tasked with basic suturing exercises. Performance scores demonstrated improvement across all assessed skills, with notable gains in suturing proficiency following CSL training. Students who participated in hands-on practice achieved significantly higher posttest scores compared with those who relied solely on online instruction, reinforcing the effectiveness of practical training. Notably, female students in both groups exhibited a statistically higher increase in performance scores than their male counterparts. These findings underscore the importance of practical, model-based training in CSL for fostering skills acquisition and revealed the impact of gender on skill development. This study contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting the integration of experiential learning into veterinary education and offers insights into optimizing training methods to enhance student outcomes.

临床技能实验室培训和在线教育对兽医学生缝合技能发展的影响:基于性别的分析。
临床技能的获得是兽医教育的基本组成部分,需要有效的教学方法来平衡理论知识和实际应用。虽然本研究的主要目的是评估临床技能实验室(CSL)培训对一年级兽医学生技能发展的有效性,但一个新出现的观察是基于性别的技能习得和提高的差异。鉴于这方面的现有研究有限,这些发现有助于了解外科培训中潜在的与性别相关的学习差异。在这项前瞻性、盲法、随机临床试验中,140名一年级兽医学生被要求进行基本的缝合练习。表现分数显示所有评估技能都有改善,CSL培训后缝合熟练程度显著提高。参与动手实践的学生比那些只依赖在线教学的学生取得了更高的测试后分数,加强了实践训练的有效性。值得注意的是,两组女生的成绩都比男生高。这些发现强调了实用的、基于模型的CSL培训对促进技能习得的重要性,并揭示了性别对技能发展的影响。这项研究为支持将体验式学习融入兽医教育提供了越来越多的证据,并为优化培训方法以提高学生成绩提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信