A feasibility trial of delayed resection for brain metastases following pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christina Schröder, Neda Haghighi, Claire Phillips, Cristian Udovicich, Michelle P Li, Katharine Drummond, James Dimou, Andrew S Davidson, Joseph Sia
{"title":"A feasibility trial of delayed resection for brain metastases following pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery.","authors":"Christina Schröder, Neda Haghighi, Claire Phillips, Cristian Udovicich, Michelle P Li, Katharine Drummond, James Dimou, Andrew S Davidson, Joseph Sia","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-05081-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BrM), an emerging alternative to post-operative SRS, is typically performed 1-2 days before resection. However, a longer period of the irradiated tumour in situ may confer anti-tumour immunological benefits. We conducted the first clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of planned delayed resection after pre-operative SRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-arm trial, patients with suspected BrM suitable for pre-operative SRS and surgery were eligible. The primary endpoint was feasibility of resection 7-21 days after SRS, with a pre-defined feasibility threshold of 66% receiving this. Secondary endpoints included 6-month adverse events (AE) and local control (LC) rates. Tumour volume change was assessed from SRS- and neurosurgery-planning MRI's.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>78 patients were screened and the target accrual of 15 patients was met. Common reasons for pre-operative SRS ineligibility were lack of existing cancer diagnosis (44%) and tumour size/peri-tumoural oedema (18%). Two patients declined resection after SRS. The median SRS-to-surgery interval was 8 days (range 0-15). Nine tumours in 8 patients (56%) received delayed resection. Reasons for earlier resection were predominantly non-medical. There were no Grade > 2 AE. The 6-month BrM LC was 100%. At a median follow-up of 13.8 months, the only BrM local failure after SRS and resection occurred with a 0-day SRS-to-surgery interval. No histopathological diagnosis issues were encountered with delayed resection. An increased SRS-to-surgery interval correlated with greater tumour shrinkage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pre-defined feasibility threshold for delayed resection was not met, but more than half of patients received delayed resection without safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ACTRN12622001372774 (Registered 26/10/2022).</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-05081-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Pre-operative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BrM), an emerging alternative to post-operative SRS, is typically performed 1-2 days before resection. However, a longer period of the irradiated tumour in situ may confer anti-tumour immunological benefits. We conducted the first clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility of planned delayed resection after pre-operative SRS.

Methods: In this single-arm trial, patients with suspected BrM suitable for pre-operative SRS and surgery were eligible. The primary endpoint was feasibility of resection 7-21 days after SRS, with a pre-defined feasibility threshold of 66% receiving this. Secondary endpoints included 6-month adverse events (AE) and local control (LC) rates. Tumour volume change was assessed from SRS- and neurosurgery-planning MRI's.

Result: 78 patients were screened and the target accrual of 15 patients was met. Common reasons for pre-operative SRS ineligibility were lack of existing cancer diagnosis (44%) and tumour size/peri-tumoural oedema (18%). Two patients declined resection after SRS. The median SRS-to-surgery interval was 8 days (range 0-15). Nine tumours in 8 patients (56%) received delayed resection. Reasons for earlier resection were predominantly non-medical. There were no Grade > 2 AE. The 6-month BrM LC was 100%. At a median follow-up of 13.8 months, the only BrM local failure after SRS and resection occurred with a 0-day SRS-to-surgery interval. No histopathological diagnosis issues were encountered with delayed resection. An increased SRS-to-surgery interval correlated with greater tumour shrinkage.

Conclusions: The pre-defined feasibility threshold for delayed resection was not met, but more than half of patients received delayed resection without safety concerns.

Trial registration number: ACTRN12622001372774 (Registered 26/10/2022).

术前立体定向放射手术后脑转移延迟切除的可行性研究。
目的:脑转移瘤(BrM)的术前立体定向放射手术(SRS)是一种新兴的术后SRS替代方案,通常在切除前1-2天进行。然而,较长时间的原位肿瘤照射可能会带来抗肿瘤免疫益处。我们进行了第一个临床试验来评估术前SRS后计划延迟切除的可行性。方法:在这项单臂试验中,适合术前SRS和手术的疑似BrM患者入选。主要终点是SRS后7-21天切除的可行性,预先设定的可行性阈值为66%。次要终点包括6个月不良事件(AE)和局部控制率(LC)。通过SRS和神经外科计划MRI评估肿瘤体积变化。结果:筛选患者78例,达到目标收益15例。术前SRS不合格的常见原因是缺乏现有的癌症诊断(44%)和肿瘤大小/肿瘤周围水肿(18%)。2例患者在SRS后拒绝切除。srs至手术的中位间隔为8天(范围0-15天)。8例患者中9例肿瘤(56%)接受延迟切除。早期切除的原因主要是非医学原因。无>2级AE。6个月BrM LC为100%。在中位随访13.8个月时,SRS和切除术后唯一的BrM局部失败发生在SRS至手术间隔为0天。延迟切除未遇到组织病理学诊断问题。srs -手术间隔的增加与肿瘤缩小相关。结论:没有达到预先设定的延迟切除术的可行性阈值,但超过一半的患者在没有安全问题的情况下接受了延迟切除术。试验注册号:ACTRN12622001372774(注册日期:26/10/2022)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信