Patient-Delivered Continuous Care for Weight Loss Maintenance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tricia M Leahey, Amy A Gorin, Tania B Huedo-Medina, Zeely Denmat, Christiana Field, Carnisha Gilder, Emily P Wyckoff, Kayla O'Connor, Korina Hahn, Kyrstyn Jenkins, Jessica L Unick, Grace Hand, Katherine McManus-Shipp, Julianna Calcaterra, Georgia Falk
{"title":"Patient-Delivered Continuous Care for Weight Loss Maintenance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Tricia M Leahey, Amy A Gorin, Tania B Huedo-Medina, Zeely Denmat, Christiana Field, Carnisha Gilder, Emily P Wyckoff, Kayla O'Connor, Korina Hahn, Kyrstyn Jenkins, Jessica L Unick, Grace Hand, Katherine McManus-Shipp, Julianna Calcaterra, Georgia Falk","doi":"10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Weight loss maintenance (WLM) is one of the most difficult challenges in obesity treatment. Continuous care, which involves frequent behavioral weight management sessions delivered by professional staff, shows promise; however, this care is costly and unsustainable. Thus, new, efficacious treatment models are needed for WLM.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the efficacy of an entirely patient-delivered treatment for WLM compared with professionally delivered standard-of-care treatment (SOC).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial used a 2-phase WLM design. During phase 1, participants received an online weight loss program. Those who achieved 5% or greater weight loss in phase 1 were eligible for phase 2, the actual 18-month WLM trial. Participants in the maintenance trial were randomized to either an entirely patient-delivered lifestyle intervention for WLM or SOC delivered by professional staff. Participants aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 50 were recruited from a single academic research center. Data were collected from February 2018 to March 2023, and data were analyzed from September 2024 to February 2025.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patient-to-patient treatment involved no professional staff; instead, mentors (successful weight losers) delivered intervention sessions and peers (fellow participants) provided ongoing, remotely delivered evidence-based social support. SOC was current best practice for WLM-group lifestyle intervention led by professionals. Both WLM interventions were 18 months in duration.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcome was weight change during the 18-month trial. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, heart rate, physical activity, and sedentary behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 287 randomized participants (240 [83.6%] female; mean [SD] age, 53.6 [0.9] years), 268 (93.4%) completed the trial. There was a statistically significant difference in weight change by arm; patient-to-patient treatment yielded significantly less weight regain than SOC (month 6: -1.44 kg [95% CI, -2.35 to 0.54] vs -0.16 [95% CI, -1.13 to 0.82]; month 12: 0.04 kg [95% CI, -0.86 to 0.95] vs 0.77 [95% CI, -0.21 to 1.47]; month 18: 0.77 kg [95% CI, -0.14 to 1.68] vs 2.37 [95% CI, 1.40 to 3.34]; P = .002). Parallel findings were observed for diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, physical activity, and sedentary behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this trial, patient-delivered lifestyle intervention (mentor interventionists plus peer support) yielded significantly better WLM and cardiovascular risk outcomes compared with SOC delivered by professionals. Future research may examine the effectiveness of this novel treatment approach in community and clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03396653.</p>","PeriodicalId":14714,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Weight loss maintenance (WLM) is one of the most difficult challenges in obesity treatment. Continuous care, which involves frequent behavioral weight management sessions delivered by professional staff, shows promise; however, this care is costly and unsustainable. Thus, new, efficacious treatment models are needed for WLM.

Objective: To examine the efficacy of an entirely patient-delivered treatment for WLM compared with professionally delivered standard-of-care treatment (SOC).

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial used a 2-phase WLM design. During phase 1, participants received an online weight loss program. Those who achieved 5% or greater weight loss in phase 1 were eligible for phase 2, the actual 18-month WLM trial. Participants in the maintenance trial were randomized to either an entirely patient-delivered lifestyle intervention for WLM or SOC delivered by professional staff. Participants aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 50 were recruited from a single academic research center. Data were collected from February 2018 to March 2023, and data were analyzed from September 2024 to February 2025.

Interventions: Patient-to-patient treatment involved no professional staff; instead, mentors (successful weight losers) delivered intervention sessions and peers (fellow participants) provided ongoing, remotely delivered evidence-based social support. SOC was current best practice for WLM-group lifestyle intervention led by professionals. Both WLM interventions were 18 months in duration.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was weight change during the 18-month trial. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, heart rate, physical activity, and sedentary behavior.

Results: Among the 287 randomized participants (240 [83.6%] female; mean [SD] age, 53.6 [0.9] years), 268 (93.4%) completed the trial. There was a statistically significant difference in weight change by arm; patient-to-patient treatment yielded significantly less weight regain than SOC (month 6: -1.44 kg [95% CI, -2.35 to 0.54] vs -0.16 [95% CI, -1.13 to 0.82]; month 12: 0.04 kg [95% CI, -0.86 to 0.95] vs 0.77 [95% CI, -0.21 to 1.47]; month 18: 0.77 kg [95% CI, -0.14 to 1.68] vs 2.37 [95% CI, 1.40 to 3.34]; P = .002). Parallel findings were observed for diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, physical activity, and sedentary behavior.

Conclusions and relevance: In this trial, patient-delivered lifestyle intervention (mentor interventionists plus peer support) yielded significantly better WLM and cardiovascular risk outcomes compared with SOC delivered by professionals. Future research may examine the effectiveness of this novel treatment approach in community and clinical settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03396653.

患者提供的持续减肥护理:一项随机临床试验。
重要性:减肥维持(WLM)是肥胖治疗中最困难的挑战之一。持续护理,包括由专业人员提供频繁的行为体重管理课程,显示出了希望;然而,这种护理既昂贵又不可持续。因此,WLM需要新的、有效的治疗模式。目的:比较完全由患者提供的治疗与专业提供的标准治疗(SOC)对WLM的疗效。设计、环境和参与者:该随机临床试验采用两期WLM设计。在第一阶段,参与者接受了一项在线减肥计划。那些在第一阶段体重减轻5%或更多的人有资格进入第二阶段,即实际的18个月的WLM试验。维持试验的参与者被随机分配到完全由患者提供的WLM生活方式干预或由专业人员提供的SOC。参与者年龄在18到75岁之间,身体质量指数(以体重公斤除以身高米的平方计算)在25到50之间,从一个学术研究中心招募。数据收集时间为2018年2月至2023年3月,数据分析时间为2024年9月至2025年2月。干预措施:患者对患者的治疗不涉及专业人员;相反,导师(成功的减肥者)提供干预课程,同伴(其他参与者)提供持续的、远程的、基于证据的社会支持。SOC是目前由专业人士领导的wlm群体生活方式干预的最佳实践。两种WLM干预措施的持续时间均为18个月。主要结局和测量:主要结局是18个月试验期间的体重变化。次要结果包括血压、心率、身体活动和久坐行为。结果:287名随机受试者中,女性240名,占83.6%;平均[SD]年龄,53.6[0.9]岁),268例(93.4%)完成了试验。各组体重变化差异有统计学意义;患者对患者治疗的体重恢复明显低于SOC(第6个月:-1.44 kg [95% CI, -2.35至0.54]vs -0.16 [95% CI, -1.13至0.82];第12个月:0.04 kg [95% CI, -0.86至0.95]vs 0.77 [95% CI, -0.21至1.47];第18个月:0.77 kg [95% CI, -0.14至1.68]vs 2.37 [95% CI, 1.40至3.34];p = .002)。在舒张压、心率、体力活动和久坐行为方面也观察到类似的结果。结论和相关性:在本试验中,患者提供的生活方式干预(导师干预师加同伴支持)与专业人员提供的SOC相比,显著提高了WLM和心血管风险结果。未来的研究可能会检验这种新型治疗方法在社区和临床环境中的有效性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03396653。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Internal Medicine
JAMA Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
43.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: JAMA Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal committed to advancing the field of internal medicine worldwide. With a focus on four core priorities—clinical relevance, clinical practice change, credibility, and effective communication—the journal aims to provide indispensable and trustworthy peer-reviewed evidence. Catering to academics, clinicians, educators, researchers, and trainees across the entire spectrum of internal medicine, including general internal medicine and subspecialties, JAMA Internal Medicine publishes innovative and clinically relevant research. The journal strives to deliver stimulating articles that educate and inform readers with the latest research findings, driving positive change in healthcare systems and patient care delivery. As a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed medical publications, JAMA Internal Medicine plays a pivotal role in shaping the discourse and advancing patient care in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信