Pairing Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials to Improve Weaning of Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.9 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000551
Fatma Refaat Ahmed, Nabeel Al-Yateem, Aram Halimi, Atefe Salimi Akinabadi, Fatemeh Hadavandsiri, Jacqueline Maria Dias, Syed Azizur Rahman, Amina Al-Marzouqi, Aaliyah Momani, Alireza Mosavi Jarrahi, Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari, Mitra Zandi, Rawia Gamil, Mohannad Eid Aburuz
{"title":"Pairing Spontaneous Awakening and Breathing Trials to Improve Weaning of Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Fatma Refaat Ahmed, Nabeel Al-Yateem, Aram Halimi, Atefe Salimi Akinabadi, Fatemeh Hadavandsiri, Jacqueline Maria Dias, Syed Azizur Rahman, Amina Al-Marzouqi, Aaliyah Momani, Alireza Mosavi Jarrahi, Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari, Mitra Zandi, Rawia Gamil, Mohannad Eid Aburuz","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review evaluates the clinical effectiveness of the spontaneous awakening trial (SAT)-spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) protocol in mechanically ventilated sedated patients (MVSPs) within intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: A comprehensive search identified 18 studies involving 12 284 patients from 11 countries. Outcomes included weaning success, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, sedation time, complications, cognitive impairment, ICU stay length, and mortality. Results: Implementing the ABCDE bundle, particularly the paired SAT-SBT protocol, significantly reduced ventilation and sedation time by nearly 50%. The intervention was associated with decreased medication use, improved patient wakefulness, and higher extubation success rates. The intervention group showed shorter durations of MV, ICU, and hospital stays. Cognitive impairment was less frequent in the intervention group at the 3-month follow-up. Nurse workload was unaffected, and 1-year mortality was lower in the SAT-SBT group. Conclusion: The systematic review supports the clinical effectiveness of the paired SAT-SBT protocol within the ABCDE bundle for MVSPs in ICUs. The protocol improved weaning outcomes, reduced ventilation and sedation time, decreased complications, and shortened durations of MV and ICU stay. The findings underscore the benefits of a comprehensive approach integrating SAT and SBT in managing MVSPs. Further research is needed to optimize intervention timing, address implementation challenges, assess cost-effectiveness, and determine generalizability across diverse patient populations and healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"48 3","pages":"237-256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review evaluates the clinical effectiveness of the spontaneous awakening trial (SAT)-spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) protocol in mechanically ventilated sedated patients (MVSPs) within intensive care units (ICUs). Methods: A comprehensive search identified 18 studies involving 12 284 patients from 11 countries. Outcomes included weaning success, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, sedation time, complications, cognitive impairment, ICU stay length, and mortality. Results: Implementing the ABCDE bundle, particularly the paired SAT-SBT protocol, significantly reduced ventilation and sedation time by nearly 50%. The intervention was associated with decreased medication use, improved patient wakefulness, and higher extubation success rates. The intervention group showed shorter durations of MV, ICU, and hospital stays. Cognitive impairment was less frequent in the intervention group at the 3-month follow-up. Nurse workload was unaffected, and 1-year mortality was lower in the SAT-SBT group. Conclusion: The systematic review supports the clinical effectiveness of the paired SAT-SBT protocol within the ABCDE bundle for MVSPs in ICUs. The protocol improved weaning outcomes, reduced ventilation and sedation time, decreased complications, and shortened durations of MV and ICU stay. The findings underscore the benefits of a comprehensive approach integrating SAT and SBT in managing MVSPs. Further research is needed to optimize intervention timing, address implementation challenges, assess cost-effectiveness, and determine generalizability across diverse patient populations and healthcare settings.

结合自主觉醒和呼吸试验改善重症监护病房患者脱机:系统回顾。
目的:本系统综述评价自主觉醒试验(SAT)-自主呼吸试验(SBT)方案在重症监护病房(icu)机械通气镇静患者(MVSPs)中的临床效果。方法:综合检索了18项研究,涉及11个国家的12284例患者。结果包括脱机成功、机械通气(MV)持续时间、镇静时间、并发症、认知功能障碍、ICU住院时间和死亡率。结果:实施ABCDE包,特别是配对SAT-SBT方案,显着减少了近50%的通气和镇静时间。干预与减少药物使用、改善患者清醒和提高拔管成功率有关。干预组MV、ICU和住院时间均较短。在3个月的随访中,干预组的认知障碍发生率较低。护士工作量不受影响,SAT-SBT组1年死亡率较低。结论:系统评价支持ABCDE bundle中SAT-SBT配对方案治疗重症MVSPs的临床有效性。该方案改善了脱机结果,减少了通气和镇静时间,减少了并发症,缩短了MV和ICU的住院时间。研究结果强调了将SAT和SBT综合起来管理mvsp的好处。需要进一步的研究来优化干预时机,解决实施挑战,评估成本效益,并确定在不同患者群体和医疗保健环境中的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信