The resisted levator scapulae test: a clinical test for C4 radiculopathy.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
William Roger Peters, James Thomas Ernest Smith, Mario Giuseppe Zotti
{"title":"The resisted levator scapulae test: a clinical test for C4 radiculopathy.","authors":"William Roger Peters, James Thomas Ernest Smith, Mario Giuseppe Zotti","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08903-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cervical radiculopathy results from compression of a nerve root in the cervical spine creating upper limb or shoulder girdle sensorimotor dysfunction which commonly affects the C5-8 roots. Isolated C4 radiculopathy is rare and lacks typical clinical radiculopathy features and, as a result is underreported and poorly diagnosed. Nerve blocks can be used on the basis of pain distribution and clinical suspicion, however, no bedside tests exist to identify and test C4 radiculopathy in isolation. The objective of our study was to assess the clinical utility of using the Resisted Levator Scapulae test in identifying patients with C4 radiculopathy on physical exam.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited on the basis of clinical suspicion of C4 radiculopathy. Participants were separated into test and pragmatic control based on radiographic evidence of C3/4 foraminal stenosis. Test group patients received the reference standard CT guided nerve root injection, pragmatic control patients were classed based on imaging. The reference standard was performed after review with a spinal surgeon where the RLS test result was recorded. Data was collected with primary and expanded analyses providing data for for predictive values using a contingency table.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five participants (12 male, 13 female) with a median age of 69 completed the study in the test group, with 298 participants (192 male, 106 female) completing the study in the pragmatic control group. Nine test group participants (2.8%) showed isolated C4 radiculopathy with response to the diagnostic CT guided C4 nerve block, while 15 (4.6%) had multilevel involvement including C4. Primary analysis revealed sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 20% with an odds ratio of 2.25 (confidence interval: 0.2-25.4). Expanded analysis strengthened specificity (93%) and NPV (99.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The resisted levator scapulae test is a novel bedside physical diagnostic test for C4 radiculopathy used to complement a neurological examination and raise suspicion when positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08903-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cervical radiculopathy results from compression of a nerve root in the cervical spine creating upper limb or shoulder girdle sensorimotor dysfunction which commonly affects the C5-8 roots. Isolated C4 radiculopathy is rare and lacks typical clinical radiculopathy features and, as a result is underreported and poorly diagnosed. Nerve blocks can be used on the basis of pain distribution and clinical suspicion, however, no bedside tests exist to identify and test C4 radiculopathy in isolation. The objective of our study was to assess the clinical utility of using the Resisted Levator Scapulae test in identifying patients with C4 radiculopathy on physical exam.

Methods: Participants were recruited on the basis of clinical suspicion of C4 radiculopathy. Participants were separated into test and pragmatic control based on radiographic evidence of C3/4 foraminal stenosis. Test group patients received the reference standard CT guided nerve root injection, pragmatic control patients were classed based on imaging. The reference standard was performed after review with a spinal surgeon where the RLS test result was recorded. Data was collected with primary and expanded analyses providing data for for predictive values using a contingency table.

Results: Twenty-five participants (12 male, 13 female) with a median age of 69 completed the study in the test group, with 298 participants (192 male, 106 female) completing the study in the pragmatic control group. Nine test group participants (2.8%) showed isolated C4 radiculopathy with response to the diagnostic CT guided C4 nerve block, while 15 (4.6%) had multilevel involvement including C4. Primary analysis revealed sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 20% with an odds ratio of 2.25 (confidence interval: 0.2-25.4). Expanded analysis strengthened specificity (93%) and NPV (99.6%).

Conclusion: The resisted levator scapulae test is a novel bedside physical diagnostic test for C4 radiculopathy used to complement a neurological examination and raise suspicion when positive.

抗提肩胛骨试验:C4神经根病的临床试验。
目的:颈椎神经根病是由于颈椎神经根受压造成上肢或肩带感觉运动功能障碍,通常影响C5-8神经根。孤立性C4神经根病是罕见的,缺乏典型的临床神经根病特征,因此被低估和诊断不良。神经阻滞可以根据疼痛分布和临床怀疑使用,但是,目前还没有床边试验来单独识别和检测C4神经根病。我们研究的目的是评估使用抗提肩胛骨试验在体格检查中识别C4神经根病患者的临床应用。方法:在临床怀疑C4神经根病的基础上招募参与者。根据C3/4椎间孔狭窄的影像学证据,将参与者分为试验组和实际对照组。试验组患者接受参考标准CT引导下的神经根注射,实用对照组患者根据影像学情况进行分类。参考标准是在脊柱外科医生检查并记录RLS测试结果后制定的。收集数据的主要分析和扩展分析提供了使用列联表的预测值的数据。结果:试验组有25名参与者(12名男性,13名女性)完成了研究,平均年龄为69岁,语用对照组有298名参与者(192名男性,106名女性)完成了研究。9名试验组参与者(2.8%)表现出孤立的C4神经根病,对诊断性CT引导的C4神经阻滞有反应,而15名参与者(4.6%)有包括C4在内的多节段受累。初步分析显示敏感性为90%,特异性为20%,优势比为2.25(可信区间:0.2-25.4)。扩展分析增强了特异性(93%)和净现值(99.6%)。结论:抗提肩胛骨试验是C4神经根病的一种新的床边物理诊断试验,用于补充神经学检查,阳性时引起怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信