Early deep sedation was associated with post-hospital one-year mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study.
{"title":"Early deep sedation was associated with post-hospital one-year mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a propensity-matched retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Peng-Yen Wu, Shang-Yi Lee, Li-Ting Wong, Wen-Cheng Chao","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03137-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Sedation is a crucial issue in critical care, but the impact of early deep sedation on post-hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked the 2015-2020 critical care database at Taichung Veterans General Hospital with the nationwide death registration in Taiwan. Log-rank test was used to estimate survival curves between patients with and without deep sedation, defined by the average Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) level within the first 3 days equal to or lower than - 3. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Furthermore, we used propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis to validate the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,135 critically ill surgical patients were enrolled, and 13.7% of them experienced early deep sedation. Independent predictors for post-hospital one-year mortality included old age, male, more comorbidities, high acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and low body mass index. We noted that receiving midazolam (aHR 1.368, 95% CI 1.052-1.780) or propofol (aHR 1.459, 95% CI 1.136-1.874) was associated with increased mortality compared with dexmedetomidine. Early deep sedation was independently associated with post-hospital mortality after adjusting for covariates (aHR 1.216, 95% CI 1.019-1.452), and the association remained robust in the PSM analysis (aHR 1.313, 95% CI 1.054-1.636).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified the association between early deep sedation and post-hospital mortality, a modifiable factor, in critically ill surgical patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03137-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Sedation is a crucial issue in critical care, but the impact of early deep sedation on post-hospital mortality in critically ill surgical patients remains unclear.
Methods: We linked the 2015-2020 critical care database at Taichung Veterans General Hospital with the nationwide death registration in Taiwan. Log-rank test was used to estimate survival curves between patients with and without deep sedation, defined by the average Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) level within the first 3 days equal to or lower than - 3. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Furthermore, we used propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis to validate the association.
Results: A total of 7,135 critically ill surgical patients were enrolled, and 13.7% of them experienced early deep sedation. Independent predictors for post-hospital one-year mortality included old age, male, more comorbidities, high acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, and low body mass index. We noted that receiving midazolam (aHR 1.368, 95% CI 1.052-1.780) or propofol (aHR 1.459, 95% CI 1.136-1.874) was associated with increased mortality compared with dexmedetomidine. Early deep sedation was independently associated with post-hospital mortality after adjusting for covariates (aHR 1.216, 95% CI 1.019-1.452), and the association remained robust in the PSM analysis (aHR 1.313, 95% CI 1.054-1.636).
Conclusion: We identified the association between early deep sedation and post-hospital mortality, a modifiable factor, in critically ill surgical patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
目的:镇静是危重症护理的关键问题,但早期深度镇静对外科危重症患者院后死亡率的影响尚不清楚。方法:我们将台中退伍军人总医院2015-2020年重症监护数据库与台湾全国死亡登记相关联。采用Log-rank检验来估计有深度镇静和没有深度镇静的患者之间的生存曲线,生存曲线由前3天内的平均Richmond躁动镇静量表(RASS)水平等于或低于- 3来定义。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型确定风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。此外,我们使用倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析来验证这种关联。结果:共纳入7135例外科危重患者,其中13.7%的患者进行了早期深度镇静。院后1年死亡率的独立预测因素包括老年、男性、更多合并症、高急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE) II评分和低体重指数。我们注意到,与右美托咪定相比,接受咪达唑仑(aHR 1.368, 95% CI 1.052-1.780)或异丙酚(aHR 1.459, 95% CI 1.136-1.874)与死亡率增加相关。在调整协变量后,早期深度镇静与院后死亡率独立相关(aHR 1.216, 95% CI 1.019-1.452),在PSM分析中,这种关联仍然稳固(aHR 1.313, 95% CI 1.054-1.636)。结论:我们确定了危重外科患者早期深度镇静与院后死亡率之间的关联,这是一个可改变的因素。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实我们的发现。
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.