Cut-offs for daily step counts are associated with measures of health status in people with COPD: An observational study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1177/14799731251345490
Juliana M B Dos Santos, Fabiano F de Lima, Caroline M Censo, Eloise A Santos, Juliana T Ito, Rafaella F Xavier, Regina M Carvalho-Pinto, Celso R F Carvalho
{"title":"Cut-offs for daily step counts are associated with measures of health status in people with COPD: An observational study.","authors":"Juliana M B Dos Santos, Fabiano F de Lima, Caroline M Censo, Eloise A Santos, Juliana T Ito, Rafaella F Xavier, Regina M Carvalho-Pinto, Celso R F Carvalho","doi":"10.1177/14799731251345490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the associations between preestablished daily step count cut-offs and health status, dyspnoea, and psychosocial distress in individuals with COPD. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 252 individuals with COPD. PADL was objectively assessed using a triaxial accelerometer, and participants were categorized as physically active or inactive according to three daily step count cut-offs previously reported for individuals with COPD (4,300, 4,580, and 5000 steps/day). Health status was measured via the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), dyspnoea was assessed via the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, and psychosocial distress was evaluated via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). <b>Results:</b> Meeting the cut-off of 5000 steps/day was associated with lower CAT scores and depressive symptoms. Meeting the cut-off of 4300 steps/day was associated with less dyspnoea (mMRC < 2). No significant associations were observed between anxiety symptoms and step count cut-offs. The 4580 steps/day cut-off did not predict health outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> A daily step count of 5000 steps appears to be the most effective threshold for distinguishing between different levels of health status and depressive symptoms in individuals with COPD. These findings suggest that step counts can be used as a clinical health indicator in this population. Future interventional studies are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251345490"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12117231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731251345490","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the associations between preestablished daily step count cut-offs and health status, dyspnoea, and psychosocial distress in individuals with COPD. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 252 individuals with COPD. PADL was objectively assessed using a triaxial accelerometer, and participants were categorized as physically active or inactive according to three daily step count cut-offs previously reported for individuals with COPD (4,300, 4,580, and 5000 steps/day). Health status was measured via the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ), dyspnoea was assessed via the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, and psychosocial distress was evaluated via the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: Meeting the cut-off of 5000 steps/day was associated with lower CAT scores and depressive symptoms. Meeting the cut-off of 4300 steps/day was associated with less dyspnoea (mMRC < 2). No significant associations were observed between anxiety symptoms and step count cut-offs. The 4580 steps/day cut-off did not predict health outcomes. Conclusions: A daily step count of 5000 steps appears to be the most effective threshold for distinguishing between different levels of health status and depressive symptoms in individuals with COPD. These findings suggest that step counts can be used as a clinical health indicator in this population. Future interventional studies are needed to confirm our findings.

每日步数的截断值与慢性阻塞性肺病患者的健康状况有关:一项观察性研究
目的:探讨COPD患者预先设定的每日步数临界值与健康状况、呼吸困难和社会心理困扰之间的关系。方法:对252例COPD患者进行横断面分析。使用三轴加速度计对PADL进行客观评估,根据先前报道的COPD患者每日3步(4300、4580和5000步/天)的步数临界值,将参与者分为体力活动或非体力活动。通过COPD评估测试(CAT)和临床COPD问卷(CCQ)测量健康状况,通过改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)量表评估呼吸困难,通过医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)评估心理社会困扰。结果:达到5000步/天的临界值与较低的CAT评分和抑郁症状相关。达到4300步/天的临界值与较少的呼吸困难相关(mMRC < 2)。没有观察到焦虑症状和步数截止值之间的显著关联。每天4580步的临界值并不能预测健康结果。结论:每日步数5000步似乎是区分COPD患者不同水平健康状况和抑郁症状的最有效阈值。这些发现表明,步数可以作为这一人群的临床健康指标。需要进一步的介入研究来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信