Use of new approach methodology for hepatic safety assessment of covalent inhibitor drug candidates.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicology Research Pub Date : 2025-05-25 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/toxres/tfaf054
Sara Amberntsson, Alison J Foster, Bhavik Chouhan, Stephen Wilkinson, Stephanie Harlfinger, Graham Smith, Jason G Kettle, Michael Niedbala, Stefan Kavanagh, Dominic P Williams
{"title":"Use of new approach methodology for hepatic safety assessment of covalent inhibitor drug candidates.","authors":"Sara Amberntsson, Alison J Foster, Bhavik Chouhan, Stephen Wilkinson, Stephanie Harlfinger, Graham Smith, Jason G Kettle, Michael Niedbala, Stefan Kavanagh, Dominic P Williams","doi":"10.1093/toxres/tfaf054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interest in inhibiting target proteins through covalent binding mechanisms has increased in the last decade due to the potential for beneficial pharmacological properties. However, the inherent targeted covalent inhibitor (TCI) adverse off-target reactivity risk requires a mitigation strategy early during drug discovery. The aim of this research was to design a pre-clinical hepatic safety assessment strategy for TCIs considering risk associated with electrophilic warhead reactivity and reactive metabolites formation at clinically-relevant plasma concentrations. The mitigation strategy was applied to compound 35, a potent irreversible inhibitor to KRAS<sup>G12C</sup>. Drug induced liver injury was assessed in primary human hepatocyte spheroids. GSH and ATP depletion were investigated for compound 35 and 6 other marketed TCIs containing an acrylamide warhead which binds irreversibly to cysteine-containing target proteins. None of the TCIs showed GSH depletion prior to ATP depletion after 7-days exposure, suggesting that GSH depletion was not driving cytotoxicity in the spheroids. The calculated hepatotoxicity margin towards plasma exposure of 2.5 for compound 35 was found to be in the same range as for the two KRAS<sup>G12C</sup>inhibitors adagrasib and sotorasib, with clinically reported treatment-related adverse aminotransferase elevations leading to dose modifications. The safety evaluation reported here suggests no negative discrepancy in liver toxicity for compound 35 versus similar approved TCI's. Finally, the risk associated with detected oxidative metabolites was further mitigated as the pan-CYP450 inhibitor 1-aminobenzotriazole (ABT) had no effect on the cytotoxicity response following incubation of compound 35 in the presence and absence of ABT.</p>","PeriodicalId":105,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"tfaf054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfaf054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in inhibiting target proteins through covalent binding mechanisms has increased in the last decade due to the potential for beneficial pharmacological properties. However, the inherent targeted covalent inhibitor (TCI) adverse off-target reactivity risk requires a mitigation strategy early during drug discovery. The aim of this research was to design a pre-clinical hepatic safety assessment strategy for TCIs considering risk associated with electrophilic warhead reactivity and reactive metabolites formation at clinically-relevant plasma concentrations. The mitigation strategy was applied to compound 35, a potent irreversible inhibitor to KRASG12C. Drug induced liver injury was assessed in primary human hepatocyte spheroids. GSH and ATP depletion were investigated for compound 35 and 6 other marketed TCIs containing an acrylamide warhead which binds irreversibly to cysteine-containing target proteins. None of the TCIs showed GSH depletion prior to ATP depletion after 7-days exposure, suggesting that GSH depletion was not driving cytotoxicity in the spheroids. The calculated hepatotoxicity margin towards plasma exposure of 2.5 for compound 35 was found to be in the same range as for the two KRASG12Cinhibitors adagrasib and sotorasib, with clinically reported treatment-related adverse aminotransferase elevations leading to dose modifications. The safety evaluation reported here suggests no negative discrepancy in liver toxicity for compound 35 versus similar approved TCI's. Finally, the risk associated with detected oxidative metabolites was further mitigated as the pan-CYP450 inhibitor 1-aminobenzotriazole (ABT) had no effect on the cytotoxicity response following incubation of compound 35 in the presence and absence of ABT.

应用新方法评价共价抑制剂候选药物的肝脏安全性。
在过去的十年中,由于潜在的有益药理特性,通过共价结合机制抑制靶蛋白的兴趣增加了。然而,固有的靶向共价抑制剂(TCI)不良脱靶反应性风险需要在药物发现早期采取缓解策略。本研究的目的是为tci设计临床前肝脏安全性评估策略,考虑亲电战斗部反应性和临床相关血浆浓度下反应性代谢物形成的相关风险。该缓解策略应用于化合物35,一种有效的不可逆KRASG12C抑制剂。在原发性人肝细胞球体中评估药物性肝损伤。研究了化合物35和其他6种市场上销售的含有丙烯酰胺战斗部的tci的GSH和ATP消耗,该战斗部与含半胱氨酸的靶蛋白不可逆结合。暴露7天后,没有一种tci在ATP消耗之前显示GSH消耗,这表明GSH消耗不是球体细胞毒性的驱动因素。经计算,化合物35与两种krasg12抑制剂阿达格拉西和索托拉西的血浆暴露肝毒性边际值为2.5,其范围与临床报道的治疗相关的不良转氨酶升高导致剂量调整相同。本文报道的安全性评估表明,化合物35与类似的经批准的TCI在肝毒性方面没有负差异。最后,与检测到的氧化代谢物相关的风险进一步降低,因为泛cyp450抑制剂1-氨基苯并三唑(ABT)在存在和不存在ABT的情况下对化合物35孵育后的细胞毒性反应没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxicology Research
Toxicology Research TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: A multi-disciplinary journal covering the best research in both fundamental and applied aspects of toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信