Donor-Site Morbidity in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft vs. Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Retrospective Monocentric Observational Study.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/aort/8833546
Simone Giusti, Marco Susca, Simona Cerulli, Edoardo De Fenu, Ezio Adriani
{"title":"Donor-Site Morbidity in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft vs. Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Retrospective Monocentric Observational Study.","authors":"Simone Giusti, Marco Susca, Simona Cerulli, Edoardo De Fenu, Ezio Adriani","doi":"10.1155/aort/8833546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Graft choice, together with operative technique, remains the most controversial topic surrounding ACL reconstruction. The ideal graft choice should recreate normal anatomy and biomechanics, allow for rapid return to play and have minimal harvest-site morbidity. The purposes of this study were to compare donor-site morbidity in all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft vs. hamstring autografts based on Hacken et al.'s ACL Donor-Site Morbidity Questionnaire (32,587,874) and to assess the role played by external factors such as sex, mood, activity level and smoking status. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> We performed a retrospective analysis of our patients' records to identify individuals who were 30 years old or younger at the time of surgery and underwent ACL reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique, without any additional treatments for ligament or meniscal injuries. At 12 months postintervention, donor-site morbidity was evaluated using the ACL donor-site morbidity questionnaire by Hacken et al. (2020). Analyses were performed using Jamovi freeware Version 2.3.19.0 (the Jamovi project, 2021). Independent samples t-test with Cohen's d as the effects' size statistics were used to compare donor-site morbidity and functional outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Significant differences between quadriceps tendon (QT) and STG groups were found for ACL donor-site morbidity questionnaire total score, numbness, size of numbness and muscle atrophy, all in favour of the QT cohort. Weak associations were found between female sex and low mood, both negatively impacting the reported donor site morbidity. No statistically significant differences were found for functional outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> ACL reconstruction with all-soft-tissue QT autograft showed overall superior donor-site morbidity outcomes when compared with HT autograft. Statistically significant results were also found in favour of QT when comparing numbness and size of numbness at the donor site and self-perceived muscle atrophy. Female sex and low mood have been found to impact donor-site morbidity negatively although larger samples are necessary to confirm this association. Graft choice in ACL reconstruction should always remain an individualized choice, but QT should be considered an equal, if not superior, alternative to other autologous autografts when comparing donor-site morbidity. <b>Trial Registration:</b> CINECA: 6458.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8833546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/aort/8833546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Graft choice, together with operative technique, remains the most controversial topic surrounding ACL reconstruction. The ideal graft choice should recreate normal anatomy and biomechanics, allow for rapid return to play and have minimal harvest-site morbidity. The purposes of this study were to compare donor-site morbidity in all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft vs. hamstring autografts based on Hacken et al.'s ACL Donor-Site Morbidity Questionnaire (32,587,874) and to assess the role played by external factors such as sex, mood, activity level and smoking status. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of our patients' records to identify individuals who were 30 years old or younger at the time of surgery and underwent ACL reconstruction using the anteromedial portal technique, without any additional treatments for ligament or meniscal injuries. At 12 months postintervention, donor-site morbidity was evaluated using the ACL donor-site morbidity questionnaire by Hacken et al. (2020). Analyses were performed using Jamovi freeware Version 2.3.19.0 (the Jamovi project, 2021). Independent samples t-test with Cohen's d as the effects' size statistics were used to compare donor-site morbidity and functional outcomes. Results: Significant differences between quadriceps tendon (QT) and STG groups were found for ACL donor-site morbidity questionnaire total score, numbness, size of numbness and muscle atrophy, all in favour of the QT cohort. Weak associations were found between female sex and low mood, both negatively impacting the reported donor site morbidity. No statistically significant differences were found for functional outcomes. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction with all-soft-tissue QT autograft showed overall superior donor-site morbidity outcomes when compared with HT autograft. Statistically significant results were also found in favour of QT when comparing numbness and size of numbness at the donor site and self-perceived muscle atrophy. Female sex and low mood have been found to impact donor-site morbidity negatively although larger samples are necessary to confirm this association. Graft choice in ACL reconstruction should always remain an individualized choice, but QT should be considered an equal, if not superior, alternative to other autologous autografts when comparing donor-site morbidity. Trial Registration: CINECA: 6458.

全软组织自体股四头肌腱与自体腘绳肌腱重建前交叉韧带(ACL)的供体部位发病率:一项回顾性单中心观察研究。
背景:移植物的选择和手术技术一直是韧带重建中最具争议的话题。理想的移植物选择应该重建正常的解剖结构和生物力学,允许快速恢复比赛,并具有最小的收获部位发病率。本研究的目的是基于Hacken等人的ACL供体部位发病率问卷(32,587,874),比较全软组织自体股四头肌移植与自体腿筋移植的供体部位发病率,并评估性别、情绪、活动水平和吸烟状况等外部因素在其中所起的作用。材料和方法:我们对患者的记录进行了回顾性分析,以确定在手术时年龄在30岁或以下的患者,并使用前内侧门静脉技术进行了ACL重建,没有任何韧带或半月板损伤的额外治疗。在干预后12个月,Hacken等人(2020)使用ACL供体部位发病率问卷评估供体部位发病率。使用Jamovi免费软件版本2.3.19.0 (Jamovi项目,2021年)进行分析。采用独立样本t检验,以Cohen’s d作为效应大小统计量来比较供体部位发病率和功能结局。结果:四头肌肌腱组(QT)和STG组在ACL供体部位发病率问卷总分、麻木、麻木大小和肌肉萎缩方面存在显著差异,均有利于QT组。女性性别与情绪低落之间存在弱关联,两者都对供体部位发病率有负面影响。在功能结局方面没有发现统计学上的显著差异。结论:与自体HT移植相比,自体全软组织QT移植重建ACL的供体部位发病率总体上优于自体HT移植。在比较供体部位的麻木程度和麻木大小与自我感觉的肌肉萎缩时,也发现有统计学意义的结果支持QT。尽管需要更大的样本来证实这种关联,但已经发现女性性别和情绪低落对供体部位发病率有负面影响。ACL重建中的移植物选择应始终是个体化的选择,但在比较供体部位发病率时,QT应该被认为是与其他自体移植物相同的选择,如果不是更好的话。试验注册:CINECA: 6458。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信