Exploring telehealth adoption and financial outcomes for rural hospitals during the COVID-19 public health emergency

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Saleema A. Karim PhD, J. Mick Tilford PhD, Cari A. Bogulski PhD, Corey J. Hayes MPH, PharmD, PhD, Hari Eswaran PhD
{"title":"Exploring telehealth adoption and financial outcomes for rural hospitals during the COVID-19 public health emergency","authors":"Saleema A. Karim PhD,&nbsp;J. Mick Tilford PhD,&nbsp;Cari A. Bogulski PhD,&nbsp;Corey J. Hayes MPH, PharmD, PhD,&nbsp;Hari Eswaran PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To examine factors associated with rural hospital telehealth adoption during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), and evaluate its relationship with rural hospital financial performance before and during the PHE.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This panel study used retrospective data (2017–2021) from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services Healthcare Cost Report Information Systems, and the Area Health Resource File. Rural hospitals were categorized as persistent adopters, persistent nonadopters, or switchers based on telehealth adoption status. Bivariate analyses assessed differences in subgroup means and frequencies, while a difference-in-difference model estimated the impact of telehealth adoption on rural hospital financial performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth adoption varied among rural hospitals. Before the PHE, 75% (751) of rural hospitals had adopted telehealth, while 25% (247) were nonadopters. Despite efforts to promote remote care delivery during the PHE, 58% (144) of pre-PHE nonadopters did not adopt telehealth. Among the 42% (103) that did adopt telehealth during the PHE, no statistically significant effect was observed on operating or total margins.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Rural hospitals in economically disadvantaged and sparsely populated areas, which stand to benefit the most from telehealth adoption, often face substantial barriers that limit their ability to adopt this technology. Financial constraints and limited resources continue to hinder adoption, underscoring the need for targeted policies and investments to expand telehealth access and improve health care outcomes in rural communities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.70038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To examine factors associated with rural hospital telehealth adoption during the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE), and evaluate its relationship with rural hospital financial performance before and during the PHE.

Methods

This panel study used retrospective data (2017–2021) from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Healthcare Cost Report Information Systems, and the Area Health Resource File. Rural hospitals were categorized as persistent adopters, persistent nonadopters, or switchers based on telehealth adoption status. Bivariate analyses assessed differences in subgroup means and frequencies, while a difference-in-difference model estimated the impact of telehealth adoption on rural hospital financial performance.

Findings

Telehealth adoption varied among rural hospitals. Before the PHE, 75% (751) of rural hospitals had adopted telehealth, while 25% (247) were nonadopters. Despite efforts to promote remote care delivery during the PHE, 58% (144) of pre-PHE nonadopters did not adopt telehealth. Among the 42% (103) that did adopt telehealth during the PHE, no statistically significant effect was observed on operating or total margins.

Conclusion

Rural hospitals in economically disadvantaged and sparsely populated areas, which stand to benefit the most from telehealth adoption, often face substantial barriers that limit their ability to adopt this technology. Financial constraints and limited resources continue to hinder adoption, underscoring the need for targeted policies and investments to expand telehealth access and improve health care outcomes in rural communities.

探讨农村医院在2019冠状病毒病突发公共卫生事件期间远程医疗的采用和财务结果
目的探讨新型冠状病毒肺炎突发公共卫生事件(PHE)期间农村医院采用远程医疗的相关因素,并评估其与PHE之前和期间农村医院财务绩效的关系。方法:本小组研究使用了来自美国医院协会年度调查、医疗保险和医疗服务中心的回顾性数据(2017-2021年);医疗补助服务医疗成本报告信息系统和区域卫生资源文件。根据远程医疗的采用情况,农村医院被分为持续采用、持续不采用或转换。双变量分析评估了亚组均值和频率的差异,而差异中差异模型估计了采用远程医疗对农村医院财务绩效的影响。结果农村医院采用远程医疗的情况存在差异。在PHE之前,75%(751家)的农村医院采用了远程医疗,而25%(247家)没有采用。尽管在PHE期间努力促进远程医疗服务,但58%(144)未采用PHE的人没有采用远程医疗。在PHE期间采用远程医疗的42%(103)中,没有观察到对营业利润或总利润的统计显着影响。结论:经济条件不利和人口稀少地区的农村医院从采用远程保健中获益最多,但往往面临重大障碍,限制了它们采用这一技术的能力。财政限制和有限的资源继续阻碍采用,突出表明需要有针对性的政策和投资,以扩大远程保健的可及性并改善农村社区的保健成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信