Harnessing the Power of Knowledge Graphs to Improve Causal Discovery

IF 5.3 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Taiyu Ban;Xiangyu Wang;Lyuzhou Chen;Derui Lyu;Xi Fan;Huanhuan Chen
{"title":"Harnessing the Power of Knowledge Graphs to Improve Causal Discovery","authors":"Taiyu Ban;Xiangyu Wang;Lyuzhou Chen;Derui Lyu;Xi Fan;Huanhuan Chen","doi":"10.1109/TETCI.2025.3540429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconstructing the structure of causal graphical models from observational data is crucial for identifying causal mechanisms in scientific research. However, real-world noise and hidden factors can make it difficult to detect true underlying causal relationships. Current methods mainly rely on extensive expert analysis to correct wrongly identified connections, guiding structure learning toward more accurate causal interactions. This reliance on expert input demands significant manual effort and is risky due to potential erroneous judgments when handling complex causal interactions. To address these issues, this paper introduces a new, expert-free method to improve causal discovery. By utilizing the extensive resources of static knowledge bases across various fields, specifically knowledge graphs (KGs), we extract causal information related to the variables of interest and use these as prior constraints in the structure learning process. Unlike the detailed constraints provided by expert analysis, the information from KGs is more general, indicating the presence of certain paths without specifying exact connections or their lengths. We incorporate these constraints in a soft way to reduce potential noise in the KG-derived priors, ensuring that our method remains reliable. Moreover, we provide interfaces for various mainstream causal discovery methods to enhance the utility of our approach. For empirical validation, we apply our approach across multiple areas of causal discovery. The results show that our method effectively enhances data-based causal discovery and demonstrates its promising applications.","PeriodicalId":13135,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence","volume":"9 3","pages":"2256-2268"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10916810/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reconstructing the structure of causal graphical models from observational data is crucial for identifying causal mechanisms in scientific research. However, real-world noise and hidden factors can make it difficult to detect true underlying causal relationships. Current methods mainly rely on extensive expert analysis to correct wrongly identified connections, guiding structure learning toward more accurate causal interactions. This reliance on expert input demands significant manual effort and is risky due to potential erroneous judgments when handling complex causal interactions. To address these issues, this paper introduces a new, expert-free method to improve causal discovery. By utilizing the extensive resources of static knowledge bases across various fields, specifically knowledge graphs (KGs), we extract causal information related to the variables of interest and use these as prior constraints in the structure learning process. Unlike the detailed constraints provided by expert analysis, the information from KGs is more general, indicating the presence of certain paths without specifying exact connections or their lengths. We incorporate these constraints in a soft way to reduce potential noise in the KG-derived priors, ensuring that our method remains reliable. Moreover, we provide interfaces for various mainstream causal discovery methods to enhance the utility of our approach. For empirical validation, we apply our approach across multiple areas of causal discovery. The results show that our method effectively enhances data-based causal discovery and demonstrates its promising applications.
利用知识图谱的力量来改进因果关系发现
利用观测数据重构因果图模型的结构,是科学研究中确定因果机制的关键。然而,现实世界的噪音和隐藏的因素会使我们很难发现真正的潜在因果关系。目前的方法主要依靠广泛的专家分析来纠正错误识别的联系,引导结构学习走向更准确的因果关系。这种对专家输入的依赖需要大量的人工努力,并且在处理复杂的因果关系时,由于潜在的错误判断而存在风险。为了解决这些问题,本文引入了一种新的、无专家的方法来改进因果发现。通过利用各个领域的静态知识库的广泛资源,特别是知识图(KGs),我们提取了与感兴趣变量相关的因果信息,并将这些信息用作结构学习过程中的先验约束。与专家分析提供的详细约束不同,KGs提供的信息更为笼统,表明某些路径的存在,而不指定确切的连接或它们的长度。我们以一种软的方式结合这些约束,以减少kg衍生先验中的潜在噪声,确保我们的方法保持可靠。此外,我们还提供了各种主流因果发现方法的接口,以增强我们方法的实用性。对于实证验证,我们将我们的方法应用于因果发现的多个领域。结果表明,该方法有效地增强了基于数据的因果发现,并展示了其良好的应用前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.50%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence (TETCI) publishes original articles on emerging aspects of computational intelligence, including theory, applications, and surveys. TETCI is an electronics only publication. TETCI publishes six issues per year. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts in any emerging topic in computational intelligence, especially nature-inspired computing topics not covered by other IEEE Computational Intelligence Society journals. A few such illustrative examples are glial cell networks, computational neuroscience, Brain Computer Interface, ambient intelligence, non-fuzzy computing with words, artificial life, cultural learning, artificial endocrine networks, social reasoning, artificial hormone networks, computational intelligence for the IoT and Smart-X technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信