Balancing growth and sustainability: The impact of economic status, energy, trade and finance on the ecological footprint in selected ASEAN economies

Tzeni Tsompo , Eleni Sardianou , Alexandra Horobet , Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate , Ioannis Kostakis
{"title":"Balancing growth and sustainability: The impact of economic status, energy, trade and finance on the ecological footprint in selected ASEAN economies","authors":"Tzeni Tsompo ,&nbsp;Eleni Sardianou ,&nbsp;Alexandra Horobet ,&nbsp;Manuel A. Zambrano-Monserrate ,&nbsp;Ioannis Kostakis","doi":"10.1016/j.samod.2025.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The present study investigates the impact of economic growth, energy intensity, financial development, human development and entrepreneurial trade on the ecological footprint (EF) in six selected Asian countries from 1995 to 2020. The results obtained through cointegration analysis confirm a long-run relationship between the considered variables and ecological footprint. Wavelet and panel data analyses depict that economic growth implies higher environmental degradation but with a diminishing effect in higher quantiles. Similarly, a positive and significant energy intensity effect on the EF is more pronounced within low levels of environmental degradation. In contrast, financial development is positive and increasing in its impact on the ecological footprint, which is especially pronounced in countries with higher levels of environmental degradation, while the human development index has, on the other hand, a negative and significant impact on the ecological footprint, implying that improvement in human capital contributes to the reduction in levels of environmental degradation. Finally, openness to trade also positively influences the EF but is statistically insignificant. The findings allow policymakers to design targeted interventions, such as promoting financial regulations that steer investments to sustainable practices, encouraging renewable energy transitions, and enhancing human development to dampen the ecological footprint.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101193,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Analytics and Modeling","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Analytics and Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667259625000049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigates the impact of economic growth, energy intensity, financial development, human development and entrepreneurial trade on the ecological footprint (EF) in six selected Asian countries from 1995 to 2020. The results obtained through cointegration analysis confirm a long-run relationship between the considered variables and ecological footprint. Wavelet and panel data analyses depict that economic growth implies higher environmental degradation but with a diminishing effect in higher quantiles. Similarly, a positive and significant energy intensity effect on the EF is more pronounced within low levels of environmental degradation. In contrast, financial development is positive and increasing in its impact on the ecological footprint, which is especially pronounced in countries with higher levels of environmental degradation, while the human development index has, on the other hand, a negative and significant impact on the ecological footprint, implying that improvement in human capital contributes to the reduction in levels of environmental degradation. Finally, openness to trade also positively influences the EF but is statistically insignificant. The findings allow policymakers to design targeted interventions, such as promoting financial regulations that steer investments to sustainable practices, encouraging renewable energy transitions, and enhancing human development to dampen the ecological footprint.
平衡增长和可持续性:经济状况、能源、贸易和金融对选定东盟经济体生态足迹的影响
本研究考察了1995 - 2020年6个亚洲国家的经济增长、能源强度、金融发展、人类发展和创业贸易对生态足迹的影响。通过协整分析获得的结果证实了所考虑的变量与生态足迹之间的长期关系。小波和面板数据分析表明,经济增长意味着更严重的环境退化,但在较高的分位数上,影响逐渐减弱。同样,在环境退化程度较低的情况下,能源强度对生态环境的积极和显著影响更为明显。相比之下,金融发展对生态足迹的影响是积极的,并且正在增加,这在环境退化程度较高的国家尤为明显,而人类发展指数对生态足迹的影响则是消极的,这意味着人力资本的改善有助于降低环境退化程度。最后,贸易开放程度也对经济产出产生积极影响,但在统计上不显著。这些发现使决策者能够设计有针对性的干预措施,例如促进金融监管,引导投资转向可持续实践,鼓励可再生能源转型,以及加强人类发展以抑制生态足迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信