{"title":"Assessment of adsorption interference from carbonaceous materials in post-explosion residue analysis of fuel–oxidizer mixtures by ion chromatography","authors":"Lúcio Paulo Lima Logrado","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2025.100671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the influence of carbonaceous materials on the extraction and analysis of post-explosion residues by ion chromatography (IC). Three adsorptive materials—activated carbon, carbonized paper residue, and vegetal charcoal—were evaluated for their capacity to retain inorganic ions typically found in combustion/explosion residues of flash powder, black powder, and explosive emulsions. The targeted ions included Cl<sup>−</sup>, NO₂<sup>−</sup>, OCN<sup>−</sup>, ClO₃<sup>−</sup>, NO₃<sup>−</sup>, SO₄<sup>2−</sup>, S₂O₃<sup>2−</sup>, SCN<sup>−</sup>, ClO₄<sup>−</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, NH₄<sup>+</sup>, and Na<sup>+</sup>. The results showed significant ion-specific retention effects, particularly for oxidizing anions, which varied depending on the type and amount of adsorbent. Additional experiments comparing room temperature and heated (90 °C) aqueous extractions demonstrated that heating does not provide a consistent solution to the problem of ion adsorption. These findings underscore the risk of false negatives or underestimation of analytes caused by the presence of carbon-rich debris, commonly found in post-explosion samples. The study highlights the importance of considering adsorptive interference when selecting sample portions for analysis, prioritizing areas with minimal carbonaceous content. These findings contribute to improving the reliability of IC and other aqueous extraction-based methods used in the forensic analysis of explosive residues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170925000335","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated the influence of carbonaceous materials on the extraction and analysis of post-explosion residues by ion chromatography (IC). Three adsorptive materials—activated carbon, carbonized paper residue, and vegetal charcoal—were evaluated for their capacity to retain inorganic ions typically found in combustion/explosion residues of flash powder, black powder, and explosive emulsions. The targeted ions included Cl−, NO₂−, OCN−, ClO₃−, NO₃−, SO₄2−, S₂O₃2−, SCN−, ClO₄−, K+, NH₄+, and Na+. The results showed significant ion-specific retention effects, particularly for oxidizing anions, which varied depending on the type and amount of adsorbent. Additional experiments comparing room temperature and heated (90 °C) aqueous extractions demonstrated that heating does not provide a consistent solution to the problem of ion adsorption. These findings underscore the risk of false negatives or underestimation of analytes caused by the presence of carbon-rich debris, commonly found in post-explosion samples. The study highlights the importance of considering adsorptive interference when selecting sample portions for analysis, prioritizing areas with minimal carbonaceous content. These findings contribute to improving the reliability of IC and other aqueous extraction-based methods used in the forensic analysis of explosive residues.
期刊介绍:
Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.