CINSARC AND SARCULATOR IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY RETROPERITONEAL SARCOMA: A COMBINED ANALYSIS OF SINGLE INSTITUTION DATA AND EORTC-STBSG-62092 TRIAL (STRASS).

Abstract

PURPOSE The Complexity Index in SARComas (CINSARC) predicts the metastatic risk in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. The aims of this study were to provide the first independent validation of CINSARC in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) and to evaluate whether CINSARC could enhance the performance of Sarculator. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A retrospective cohort included patients with primary localized RPS resected with curative intent (2011-2015) at a single institution. The STRASS cohort comprised patients from the surgery-only arm of the EORTC-STBSG-62092 (STRASS) trial who had undergone CINSARC categorization. Patients were classified as CINSARC low-risk (C1) vs high-risk (C2). Primary study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Sarculator performance was assessed in terms of discrimination (Harrell's C-index) and calibration (calibration plots, Brier score) before and after adding CINSARC. RESULTS The study cohorts included 104 and 69 patients, respectively, with similar OS. In a pooled cohort, at multivariable analysis for OS considering Sarculator and CINSARC, only Sarculator was significantly associated with OS (HR 1.93, 95%CI 1.35, 2.74, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis for DFS, both Sarculator (HR 1.51, 95%CI 1.09, 2.09, p=0.013) and CINSARC (HR 2.01, 95%CI 1.26, 3.23, p=0.004) were significantly associated with DFS. However, the addition of CINSARC did not improve Sarculator's discrimination or calibration for either OS or DFS. CONCLUSION This study validates CINSARC as a prognostic predictor for OS and DFS in patients with primary RPS. CINSARC did not improve the performance of Sarculator, suggesting that its addition to the Sarculator may not provide added clinical benefit.