129Xe-MRI ventilation and acinar abnormalities highlight the significance of spirometric dysanapsis: findings from the NOVELTY ADPro UK substudy

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thorax Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-222347
Laurie J Smith, Helen Marshall, Demi Jakymelen, Alberto Biancardi, Guilhem J Collier, Ho-Fung Chan, Paul J C Hughes, Martin L Brook, Josh R Astley, Ryan Munro, Smitha Rajaram, Andrew J Swift, David Capener, Jody Bray, Jimmy E Ball, Oliver Rodgers, Bilal A Tahir, Madhwesha Rao, Graham Norquay, Nicholas D Weatherley, Leanne Armstrong, Latife Hardaker, Alberto Papi, Rod Hughes, Jim M Wild
{"title":"129Xe-MRI ventilation and acinar abnormalities highlight the significance of spirometric dysanapsis: findings from the NOVELTY ADPro UK substudy","authors":"Laurie J Smith, Helen Marshall, Demi Jakymelen, Alberto Biancardi, Guilhem J Collier, Ho-Fung Chan, Paul J C Hughes, Martin L Brook, Josh R Astley, Ryan Munro, Smitha Rajaram, Andrew J Swift, David Capener, Jody Bray, Jimmy E Ball, Oliver Rodgers, Bilal A Tahir, Madhwesha Rao, Graham Norquay, Nicholas D Weatherley, Leanne Armstrong, Latife Hardaker, Alberto Papi, Rod Hughes, Jim M Wild","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-222347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale Airways dysanapsis is defined by CT or spirometry as a mismatch between the size of the airways and lung volume and is associated with increased risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Lung disease in participants with dysanapsis and a label of asthma and/or COPD remains poorly understood. Methods In participants with asthma and/or COPD, we used 129Xe-MRI to assess ventilation, acinar dimensions and gas exchange, and pulmonary function tests, and compared people with spirometric dysanapsis (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<−1.64 z and FEV1>−1.64 z) to those with normal spirometry (FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC>−1.64 z). Results From 165 participants assessed in the NOVELTY (NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY) ADPro (advanced diagnostic profiling) study with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD, 43 had spirometric dysanapsis and were age-matched to 43 participants with normal spirometry. Participants with dysanapsis had significantly increased ventilation defects (median difference (md) (95% CI) = 4.0% (1.42% to 5.38%), p<0.001), ventilation heterogeneity (md (95% CI) = 2.56% (1.31% to 3.56%), p<0.001) and measures of acinar dimensions (md (95% CI) = 0.004 cm2.s−1 (0.0009 to 0.007), p=0.009) from 129Xe-MRI, than those with normal spirometry. At the 1-year follow-up, only participants with dysanapsis had a significant increase in ventilation defects (md (95% CI)=0.45% (0.09% to 2.1%),p=0.016). Lower FEV1/FVC in the dysanapsis cohort was associated with increased ventilation defects (r=−0.64, R2=0.41, p<0.001) and increased acinar dimensions (r=−0.52, R2=0.38, p<0.001), with the highest values seen in those with an FVC above the upper limit of normal. Conclusions Participants with asthma and/or COPD, presenting to primary care with spirometric dysanapsis, exhibited increased lung abnormalities on 129Xe-MRI, when compared with those with normal spirometry. Spirometric dysanapsis in asthma and/or COPD is therefore associated with significant lung disease, and the FEV1/FVC is related to the degree of airways abnormality on 129Xe-MRI. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. De-identified participant data underlying the findings described in this manuscript may be obtained in accordance with AstraZeneca’s data-sharing policy described at <https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure>. Data for studies directly listed on Vivli can be requested through Vivli at <https://vivli.org/>. Data for studies not listed on Vivli could be requested through Vivli at <https://vivli.org/members/enquiries-about-studies-not-listed-on-the-vivli-platform/>. AstraZeneca Vivli member page is also available outlining further details: <https://vivli.org/ourmember/astrazeneca/>. The NOVELTY protocol is available at <https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com>.","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-222347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale Airways dysanapsis is defined by CT or spirometry as a mismatch between the size of the airways and lung volume and is associated with increased risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Lung disease in participants with dysanapsis and a label of asthma and/or COPD remains poorly understood. Methods In participants with asthma and/or COPD, we used 129Xe-MRI to assess ventilation, acinar dimensions and gas exchange, and pulmonary function tests, and compared people with spirometric dysanapsis (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<−1.64 z and FEV1>−1.64 z) to those with normal spirometry (FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC>−1.64 z). Results From 165 participants assessed in the NOVELTY (NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY) ADPro (advanced diagnostic profiling) study with a physician-assigned diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD, 43 had spirometric dysanapsis and were age-matched to 43 participants with normal spirometry. Participants with dysanapsis had significantly increased ventilation defects (median difference (md) (95% CI) = 4.0% (1.42% to 5.38%), p<0.001), ventilation heterogeneity (md (95% CI) = 2.56% (1.31% to 3.56%), p<0.001) and measures of acinar dimensions (md (95% CI) = 0.004 cm2.s−1 (0.0009 to 0.007), p=0.009) from 129Xe-MRI, than those with normal spirometry. At the 1-year follow-up, only participants with dysanapsis had a significant increase in ventilation defects (md (95% CI)=0.45% (0.09% to 2.1%),p=0.016). Lower FEV1/FVC in the dysanapsis cohort was associated with increased ventilation defects (r=−0.64, R2=0.41, p<0.001) and increased acinar dimensions (r=−0.52, R2=0.38, p<0.001), with the highest values seen in those with an FVC above the upper limit of normal. Conclusions Participants with asthma and/or COPD, presenting to primary care with spirometric dysanapsis, exhibited increased lung abnormalities on 129Xe-MRI, when compared with those with normal spirometry. Spirometric dysanapsis in asthma and/or COPD is therefore associated with significant lung disease, and the FEV1/FVC is related to the degree of airways abnormality on 129Xe-MRI. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. De-identified participant data underlying the findings described in this manuscript may be obtained in accordance with AstraZeneca’s data-sharing policy described at . Data for studies directly listed on Vivli can be requested through Vivli at . Data for studies not listed on Vivli could be requested through Vivli at . AstraZeneca Vivli member page is also available outlining further details: . The NOVELTY protocol is available at .
x - mri通气和腺泡异常突出了呼吸功能障碍的重要性:来自NOVELTY ADPro UK子研究的发现
气道功能障碍是由CT或肺活量测量定义为气道大小与肺容量不匹配,并与发生慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的风险增加有关。肺功能障碍和哮喘和/或COPD标签的参与者的肺部疾病仍然知之甚少。方法在哮喘和/或COPD患者中,我们使用129Xe-MRI评估通气、腺泡尺寸和气体交换以及肺功能测试,并将肺活量测量功能障碍(1 s用力呼气量(FEV1)/用力肺活量(FVC) - 1.64 z)的患者与肺活量测量正常(FEV1、FVC和FEV1/FVC> - 1.64 z)的患者进行比较。在新观察性纵向研究(NOVEL observational longiTudinal studY) ADPro (advanced diagnostic profiling)研究中评估的165名参与者中,有医生指定的哮喘和/或COPD诊断,其中43名患有肺活量失调,与43名肺活量正常的参与者年龄匹配。功能障碍的参与者通气缺陷显著增加(中位差(md) (95% CI) = 4.0%(1.42%至5.38%),p.直接在Vivli上列出的研究数据可通过Vivli网站查询。未在Vivli上列出的研究数据可以通过Vivli的网址请求。阿斯利康Vivli会员页面也提供了进一步的详细信息:NOVELTY协议可在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信