The path to prevention of multiple sclerosis: Considerations for Epstein-Barr virus vaccine-based prevention studies.

IF 5
Gregory K Zane, Anna Sutton, Amanda Brumwell, Md Rezaul Hossain, Stephen E Hawes, Gavin Giovannoni, Ellen M Mowry, Steven Jacobson, Jeffrey I Cohen, Bruce Bebo, Rena C Patel
{"title":"The path to prevention of multiple sclerosis: Considerations for Epstein-Barr virus vaccine-based prevention studies.","authors":"Gregory K Zane, Anna Sutton, Amanda Brumwell, Md Rezaul Hossain, Stephen E Hawes, Gavin Giovannoni, Ellen M Mowry, Steven Jacobson, Jeffrey I Cohen, Bruce Bebo, Rena C Patel","doi":"10.1177/13524585251340812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advancements in our understanding of the association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and multiple sclerosis (MS), along with progress in EBV vaccine development, warrant serious considerations of future EBV vaccine-based MS-prevention studies. The clinical, financial, logistical, and technological considerations for designing and conducting retrospective and/or prospective prevention studies with the primary objective of evaluating the effectiveness of EBV vaccines in preventing MS and other EBV-associated sequelae are presented here. As implementation of these studies may require hundreds of thousands of participants, millions of dollars, and decades to observe if meaningful reductions in MS incidence occur, alternative approaches using pragmatic phase IV, post-licensure study designs focused on either the prevention of MS or infectious mononucleosis (IM), a common clinical manifestation of EBV infection that has been associated with increased risk of MS, are also explored. Current knowledge gaps in technology, funding, and research that must be addressed for a study protocol to be successfully designed and implemented are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":520714,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","volume":" ","pages":"905-915"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251340812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in our understanding of the association between Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and multiple sclerosis (MS), along with progress in EBV vaccine development, warrant serious considerations of future EBV vaccine-based MS-prevention studies. The clinical, financial, logistical, and technological considerations for designing and conducting retrospective and/or prospective prevention studies with the primary objective of evaluating the effectiveness of EBV vaccines in preventing MS and other EBV-associated sequelae are presented here. As implementation of these studies may require hundreds of thousands of participants, millions of dollars, and decades to observe if meaningful reductions in MS incidence occur, alternative approaches using pragmatic phase IV, post-licensure study designs focused on either the prevention of MS or infectious mononucleosis (IM), a common clinical manifestation of EBV infection that has been associated with increased risk of MS, are also explored. Current knowledge gaps in technology, funding, and research that must be addressed for a study protocol to be successfully designed and implemented are also discussed.

预防多发性硬化症的途径:基于eb病毒疫苗的预防研究的考虑
最近我们对eb病毒(EBV)与多发性硬化症(MS)之间关系的了解有所进展,以及EBV疫苗开发的进展,值得我们认真考虑未来基于EBV疫苗的MS预防研究。本文介绍了设计和开展回顾性和/或前瞻性预防研究的临床、财政、后勤和技术方面的考虑,主要目的是评估EBV疫苗在预防MS和其他EBV相关后遗症方面的有效性。由于这些研究的实施可能需要数十万参与者,数百万美元和数十年的时间来观察是否有意义的MS发病率降低,因此也探索了使用实用的IV期,许可后研究设计的替代方法,重点是预防MS或传染性单核细胞增多症(IM),这是EBV感染的常见临床表现,与MS风险增加有关。本文还讨论了为成功设计和实施研究方案必须解决的当前技术、资金和研究方面的知识差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信