Erythrocyte and Serum Folate Collection Techniques: A Multi-Method Study of Folate Status.

Vitamins & minerals Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-02-10
J Croff, C Tan, A L Chiaf, M L Hartwell, E K Crockett, T K Teague
{"title":"Erythrocyte and Serum Folate Collection Techniques: A Multi-Method Study of Folate Status.","authors":"J Croff, C Tan, A L Chiaf, M L Hartwell, E K Crockett, T K Teague","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Public health programs aimed at identifying and monitoring individuals at risk of specific nutrient deficiencies may benefit from advances in biospecimen sampling techniques that allow for easier in-the-field collections. Such advances may be particularly important for those of childbearing potential, in order to identify individuals at risk of low folate status due to sub-optimal nutriture. Folate is a critical nutrient of interest among women of childbearing potential because suboptimal levels are a primary contributor to neural tube defects. Whatman Paper Dried Blood Spots (WDBS) are a convenient method for assessing folate; however, a major drawback of WDBS has been the inability to separate serum from erythrocyte folate in these samples.</p><p><strong>Aim of study: </strong>The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of using newer linear flow chromatography DBS cards to measure serum and erythrocyte folate.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A convenience sample (n=27) was recruited to assess folate values collected by venous blood draw, Whatman paper, and linear flow chromatography cards. These sampling techniques allowed for assessment of erythrocyte and serum folate values collected via different methods. Folate levels in the samples were assessed using standard <i>Lactobacillus casei</i> microbiological assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Erythrocyte folate values from the two blood spot methodologies (Whatman paper and linear flow chromatography DBS) indicate a strong linear relationship, with 92% of variance accounted for in a linear regression analysis. Similarly, venous blood samples and linear flow chromatography DBS values accounted for 88% of the variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Linear flow chromatography dried blood spot cards are useful for assessment of erythrocyte and serum folate. Values had a strong, positive, linear relationship to serum and erythrocyte folate values from other validated methodologies, including Whatman dried blood spots and venous whole blood samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":520848,"journal":{"name":"Vitamins & minerals","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vitamins & minerals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Public health programs aimed at identifying and monitoring individuals at risk of specific nutrient deficiencies may benefit from advances in biospecimen sampling techniques that allow for easier in-the-field collections. Such advances may be particularly important for those of childbearing potential, in order to identify individuals at risk of low folate status due to sub-optimal nutriture. Folate is a critical nutrient of interest among women of childbearing potential because suboptimal levels are a primary contributor to neural tube defects. Whatman Paper Dried Blood Spots (WDBS) are a convenient method for assessing folate; however, a major drawback of WDBS has been the inability to separate serum from erythrocyte folate in these samples.

Aim of study: The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility of using newer linear flow chromatography DBS cards to measure serum and erythrocyte folate.

Method: A convenience sample (n=27) was recruited to assess folate values collected by venous blood draw, Whatman paper, and linear flow chromatography cards. These sampling techniques allowed for assessment of erythrocyte and serum folate values collected via different methods. Folate levels in the samples were assessed using standard Lactobacillus casei microbiological assays.

Results: Erythrocyte folate values from the two blood spot methodologies (Whatman paper and linear flow chromatography DBS) indicate a strong linear relationship, with 92% of variance accounted for in a linear regression analysis. Similarly, venous blood samples and linear flow chromatography DBS values accounted for 88% of the variance.

Conclusion: Linear flow chromatography dried blood spot cards are useful for assessment of erythrocyte and serum folate. Values had a strong, positive, linear relationship to serum and erythrocyte folate values from other validated methodologies, including Whatman dried blood spots and venous whole blood samples.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

红细胞和血清叶酸收集技术:叶酸状态的多方法研究。
引言:旨在识别和监测有特定营养缺乏症风险的个人的公共卫生计划可能受益于生物标本采样技术的进步,这种技术可以更容易地在现场收集。对于那些有生育潜力的人来说,这些进展可能尤其重要,因为它们可以识别出由于营养不足而存在叶酸水平低风险的个体。叶酸对于有生育能力的女性来说是一种重要的营养物质,因为不理想的叶酸水平是神经管缺陷的主要原因。Whatman纸干血斑(WDBS)是测定叶酸含量的简便方法;然而,WDBS的一个主要缺点是无法在这些样品中分离血清和红细胞叶酸。研究目的:本研究的目的是测试新的线性流动色谱DBS卡测定血清和红细胞叶酸的可行性。方法:选取方便样本(27例),通过静脉血、Whatman纸和线性流色谱卡测定叶酸值。这些采样技术允许评估红细胞和血清叶酸值收集通过不同的方法。使用标准干酪乳杆菌微生物学测定法评估样品中的叶酸水平。结果:两种血点方法(Whatman paper和线性流动色谱DBS)的红细胞叶酸值显示出很强的线性关系,在线性回归分析中占92%的方差。同样,静脉血样品和线性流色谱DBS值占方差的88%。结论:线性流动色谱法测定干血点卡是测定红细胞和血清叶酸的有效方法。从其他经过验证的方法(包括Whatman干血点和静脉全血样本)中得到的值与血清和红细胞叶酸值有很强的、正的线性关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信