Comparison of abutment screw loosening between titanium and zirconia implants: an in-vitro study.

Amir Hossein Fathi, Behnaz Ebadian, Shekoufeh Arab, Sepideh Salehi, Ramin Atash
{"title":"Comparison of abutment screw loosening between titanium and zirconia implants: an in-vitro study.","authors":"Amir Hossein Fathi, Behnaz Ebadian, Shekoufeh Arab, Sepideh Salehi, Ramin Atash","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Abutment screw loosening is a common complication in implant-based prostheses. Given the importance of aesthetics in anterior regions, zirconia implants and abutments have been introduced. This study aims to compare the extent of abutment screw loosening between zirconia and titanium implants to determine the best treatment option.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This in vitro study assessed abutment screw loosening in titanium and zirconia implants. Ten zirconia dental implant fixtures (10 mm in length, 4.3 mm in diameter) with ten zirconia abutments and titanium screws were allocated in one group, and ten titanium implant fixtures of the same dimensions with ten titanium abutments and titanium screws were allocated to the other group. The abutment screws were tightened to a torque of 35 N/cm using a torque meter and placed in resin blocks. The center of the resin block then underwent a compressive force of 75 N and 12400 cycles and a frequency of 75 cycles per minute. Furthermore, the removal torque value (RTV) of each screw was measured. The data on screw loosening forces were analyzed and compared using T-test, with a significance level set at 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average removal torque for titanium implants was 21.53 N/cm, while for zirconia implants, it was 18.46 N/cm. A T-test comparison showed that titanium implants had a significantly higher removal torque value than zirconia implants (p < 0.001).In laboratory conditions, titanium implants exhibit significantly higher removal torque values than zirconia implants, suggesting they may offer better stability in similar clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":519890,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of oral implantology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of oral implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-25-00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Abutment screw loosening is a common complication in implant-based prostheses. Given the importance of aesthetics in anterior regions, zirconia implants and abutments have been introduced. This study aims to compare the extent of abutment screw loosening between zirconia and titanium implants to determine the best treatment option.

Methods: This in vitro study assessed abutment screw loosening in titanium and zirconia implants. Ten zirconia dental implant fixtures (10 mm in length, 4.3 mm in diameter) with ten zirconia abutments and titanium screws were allocated in one group, and ten titanium implant fixtures of the same dimensions with ten titanium abutments and titanium screws were allocated to the other group. The abutment screws were tightened to a torque of 35 N/cm using a torque meter and placed in resin blocks. The center of the resin block then underwent a compressive force of 75 N and 12400 cycles and a frequency of 75 cycles per minute. Furthermore, the removal torque value (RTV) of each screw was measured. The data on screw loosening forces were analyzed and compared using T-test, with a significance level set at 0.05.

Results: The average removal torque for titanium implants was 21.53 N/cm, while for zirconia implants, it was 18.46 N/cm. A T-test comparison showed that titanium implants had a significantly higher removal torque value than zirconia implants (p < 0.001).In laboratory conditions, titanium implants exhibit significantly higher removal torque values than zirconia implants, suggesting they may offer better stability in similar clinical settings.

钛和氧化锆种植体基牙螺钉松动的比较:一项体外研究。
目的:基牙螺钉松动是种植体修复中常见的并发症。考虑到美观在前牙区的重要性,氧化锆种植体和基台已经被引入。本研究旨在比较氧化锆和钛种植体的基牙螺钉松动程度,以确定最佳的治疗方案。方法:本研究评估钛和氧化锆种植体的基牙螺钉松动。一组分配10个长度为10mm,直径为4.3 mm的氧化锆种植体固定架,10个氧化锆基牙和钛螺钉;另一组分配10个相同尺寸的钛种植体固定架,10个钛基牙和钛螺钉。使用扭矩计将基台螺钉拧紧至35 N/cm,并放置在树脂块中。然后,树脂块的中心承受75 N的压缩力和12400次循环,频率为75次/分钟。此外,还测量了各螺杆的去除扭矩值(RTV)。螺钉松动力数据分析比较采用t检验,显著性水平设为0.05。结果:钛种植体的平均去除扭矩为21.53 N/cm,氧化锆种植体的平均去除扭矩为18.46 N/cm。经t检验比较,钛种植体的去除扭矩值明显高于氧化锆种植体(p < 0.001)。在实验室条件下,钛种植体的移除扭矩值明显高于氧化锆种植体,这表明钛种植体在类似的临床环境中具有更好的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信