The association of patient and clinician demographics and concordance with medicaid sterilization consent form validity.

Lisa Jackson-Moore, Kim Malloy, Gene Urrutia, Kristen A Berg, Emily S Miller, Margaret Boozer, Tania Serna, Jennifer L Bailit, Suzanna Larkin, Kavita Shah Arora
{"title":"The association of patient and clinician demographics and concordance with medicaid sterilization consent form validity.","authors":"Lisa Jackson-Moore, Kim Malloy, Gene Urrutia, Kristen A Berg, Emily S Miller, Margaret Boozer, Tania Serna, Jennifer L Bailit, Suzanna Larkin, Kavita Shah Arora","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>To evaluate the association between patient demographics, clinician demographics, and concordance of patient-clinician demographics and Medicaid sterilization consent form validity, defined as the waiting period having elapsed.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a large, multi-center retrospective cohort study. This analysis included patients with Medicaid insurance desiring postpartum permanent contraception across three study sites. Our primary outcome was Medicaid sterilization consent form validity. Patient demographics were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Clinician demographics were obtained both through self- and peer-report. Descriptive, random effects modeling, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1644 patients delivered by 124 clinicians in our cohort, 840 (51 %) had a valid Medicaid sterilization consent form. Descriptively, patients who were Black, unmarried, and not college educated were more likely to have valid forms (p < 0.001). The religious affiliation of the clinician (p < 0.001), but no other clinician characteristics, was associated with form validity. In multivariable models, patients who were of a different racial identity than their clinicians were more likely to have a valid form (aOR 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>While unable to determine the causes of our findings, the differential proportion of Medicaid sterilization consent form validity based on patient characteristics is concerning. Differences in form validity based on patient-clinician racial and ethnic concordance is deserving of further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2025.04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s): To evaluate the association between patient demographics, clinician demographics, and concordance of patient-clinician demographics and Medicaid sterilization consent form validity, defined as the waiting period having elapsed.

Study design: Secondary analysis of a large, multi-center retrospective cohort study. This analysis included patients with Medicaid insurance desiring postpartum permanent contraception across three study sites. Our primary outcome was Medicaid sterilization consent form validity. Patient demographics were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Clinician demographics were obtained both through self- and peer-report. Descriptive, random effects modeling, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized.

Results: Of the 1644 patients delivered by 124 clinicians in our cohort, 840 (51 %) had a valid Medicaid sterilization consent form. Descriptively, patients who were Black, unmarried, and not college educated were more likely to have valid forms (p < 0.001). The religious affiliation of the clinician (p < 0.001), but no other clinician characteristics, was associated with form validity. In multivariable models, patients who were of a different racial identity than their clinicians were more likely to have a valid form (aOR 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.66).

Conclusion(s): While unable to determine the causes of our findings, the differential proportion of Medicaid sterilization consent form validity based on patient characteristics is concerning. Differences in form validity based on patient-clinician racial and ethnic concordance is deserving of further study.

患者和临床医生的人口统计数据的关联以及与医疗补助绝育同意书有效性的一致性。
目的:评估患者人口统计学、临床医生人口统计学以及患者-临床医生人口统计学与医疗补助绝育同意书有效性(定义为等待期已过)的一致性之间的关系。研究设计:对一项大型多中心回顾性队列研究进行二次分析。该分析包括三个研究地点的医疗补助保险患者希望产后永久避孕。我们的主要结果是医疗补助绝育同意书的有效性。从电子病历中提取患者人口统计数据。通过自我报告和同行报告两种方式获得临床人口统计数据。采用描述性、随机效应模型和多变量logistic回归分析。结果:在我们的队列中124名临床医生接生的1644例患者中,840例(51% %)有有效的医疗补助绝育同意书。描述性地说,黑人、未婚、未受过大学教育的患者更有可能有有效的表格(p )结论(s):虽然无法确定我们发现的原因,但基于患者特征的医疗补助绝育同意书有效性的差异比例令人担忧。基于患者-临床医师种族和民族一致性的表格效度差异值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信