Knee hyperextension is not associated with anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function or revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children and adolescents.

Frida Hansson, Anders Stålman, Gunnar Edman, Per-Mats Janarv, Eva Bengtsson Moström, Riccardo Cristiani
{"title":"Knee hyperextension is not associated with anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function or revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children and adolescents.","authors":"Frida Hansson, Anders Stålman, Gunnar Edman, Per-Mats Janarv, Eva Bengtsson Moström, Riccardo Cristiani","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether contralateral knee hyperextension (KHE) is associated with anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function or revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients <18 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients <18 years who underwent primary ACLR at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden between January 2002 and March 2017 were identified. They were dichotomised into a 'hyperextension' group (≤-5°) and 'no hyperextension' group (>-5°) depending on preoperative contralateral passive knee extension degree. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer) was measured preoperatively and 6 months post-operatively. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and after 2 years. Revision ACLR within 5 years after primary ACLR was captured in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1250 patients (63.6% female [n = 795]; mean age 15.5 ± 1.5 years) were included (hyperextension group: 52.9% [n = 661]). Mean extension was -6.1 ± 2.2° in the hyperextension group and 0 ± 0.7° in the no hyperextension group. Hamstring autograft was used in 93.3% (1166 out of 1250). No significant difference between the groups was seen in anterior knee laxity or in the rate of surgical failure at 6 months post-operatively (side-to-side difference: >5 mm) (hyperextension group, 6.6% [32 out of 484 patients] vs. no hyperextension group, 6.8% [29 out of 428 patients]; p = ns). Statistically significant but non-clinically relevant intergroup differences were seen in the KOOS Sport/Recreation and Quality of Life subscales after 2 years. The rate of revision ACLR within 5 years was 11.1% (119 out of 1073 patients). The hazard for revision ACLR in the hyperextension group was not significantly different from the no hyperextension group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.31; p = ns).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no significant association between preoperative passive contralateral KHE and anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function or the risk of revision ACL surgery in paediatric patients. These findings suggest that KHE alone should not preclude the use of hamstring tendon grafts in children and adolescents undergoing ACL reconstruction. The study found a high rate of revision ACL surgery in this paediatric population.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether contralateral knee hyperextension (KHE) is associated with anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function or revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients <18 years.

Methods: Patients <18 years who underwent primary ACLR at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden between January 2002 and March 2017 were identified. They were dichotomised into a 'hyperextension' group (≤-5°) and 'no hyperextension' group (>-5°) depending on preoperative contralateral passive knee extension degree. Anterior knee laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer) was measured preoperatively and 6 months post-operatively. The knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and after 2 years. Revision ACLR within 5 years after primary ACLR was captured in the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry.

Results: 1250 patients (63.6% female [n = 795]; mean age 15.5 ± 1.5 years) were included (hyperextension group: 52.9% [n = 661]). Mean extension was -6.1 ± 2.2° in the hyperextension group and 0 ± 0.7° in the no hyperextension group. Hamstring autograft was used in 93.3% (1166 out of 1250). No significant difference between the groups was seen in anterior knee laxity or in the rate of surgical failure at 6 months post-operatively (side-to-side difference: >5 mm) (hyperextension group, 6.6% [32 out of 484 patients] vs. no hyperextension group, 6.8% [29 out of 428 patients]; p = ns). Statistically significant but non-clinically relevant intergroup differences were seen in the KOOS Sport/Recreation and Quality of Life subscales after 2 years. The rate of revision ACLR within 5 years was 11.1% (119 out of 1073 patients). The hazard for revision ACLR in the hyperextension group was not significantly different from the no hyperextension group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.31; p = ns).

Conclusions: There was no significant association between preoperative passive contralateral KHE and anterior knee laxity, subjective knee function or the risk of revision ACL surgery in paediatric patients. These findings suggest that KHE alone should not preclude the use of hamstring tendon grafts in children and adolescents undergoing ACL reconstruction. The study found a high rate of revision ACL surgery in this paediatric population.

Level of evidence: Level III.

在儿童和青少年中,膝关节过伸与膝关节前松弛、主观膝关节功能或前交叉韧带重建后的翻修手术无关。
目的:评估患者对侧膝关节过伸(KHE)是否与膝关节前松弛、主观膝关节功能或原发性前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后的翻修手术相关。方法:患者-5°,取决于术前对侧被动膝关节伸度。术前和术后6个月分别测量膝关节前松度(KT-1000关节计)。术前和术后2年分别收集膝关节损伤和骨关节炎预后评分(kos)。在瑞典国家膝关节注册中心发现原发性ACLR后5年内进行ACLR翻修。结果:1250例患者(女性占63.6% [n = 795]);平均年龄15.5±1.5岁),其中超伸组占52.9% [n = 661]。过伸组平均伸展度为-6.1±2.2°,无过伸组平均伸展度为0±0.7°。93.3%(1250例中1166例)采用自体腘绳肌腱移植。两组在术后6个月前膝关节松弛或手术失败率方面无显著差异(侧对侧差异:0.5 mm)(过伸组,6.6%[484例患者中的32例]vs.无过伸组,6.8%[428例患者中的29例];p = ns)。2年后,kos运动/娱乐和生活质量亚量表的组间差异具有统计学意义,但与临床无关。5年内ACLR改进率为11.1%(1073例患者中有119例)。过伸组改良ACLR的风险与未过伸组无显著差异(风险比,0.91;95%置信区间为0.63-1.31;p = ns)。结论:儿童患者术前被动对侧KHE与前膝关节松弛、主观膝关节功能或前交叉韧带翻修手术风险无显著相关性。这些发现表明,仅KHE不应排除在儿童和青少年进行前交叉韧带重建时使用腘绳肌腱移植。研究发现,在这一儿科人群中,前交叉韧带翻修手术的发生率很高。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信