Breanna Thompson , Rasheda J. Vereen , Torie C. Plowden , Monica A. Lutgendorf
{"title":"Personal reflections on race-based medicine: narrative analysis of a case study using a situated lens","authors":"Breanna Thompson , Rasheda J. Vereen , Torie C. Plowden , Monica A. Lutgendorf","doi":"10.1016/j.jnma.2025.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Race-based medicine was initially established to risk-stratify patients using algorithms based on biological similarities. This generalized form of medicine resulted in harmful practices and health inequities. Although race-based medicine has received increasing attention as a harmful practice contributing to structural and systemic racism in medicine, the individual patient perspective remains relatively under-studied, particularly in obstetrics. This qualitative case study uses a situated lens to explore the individual experience and perspective of race-based medicine in perinatal care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was an institutional review board approved qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews as part of a larger study investigating the birth experiences of military beneficiaries. The interview was recorded and transcribed with data inductively analyzed using narrative analysis with positioning theory to identify positions and lived experiences during the individual's care experiences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Narrative analysis yielded the following themes: (1) self-identity; (2) reinforcing racial sensitivity; (3) health individualization; (4) internal conflict with external perception and honesty; (5) trust and respect; (6) resisting negative influence and press/stories; (7) intellectualization; and (8) fear vs. empowerment for personalized birth wishes. Each theme represented valid concerns patients may experience with race-based medicine in a healthcare setting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The application of race-based medicine during prenatal care may harm the relationship between pregnant individuals and clinicians, leading to an overall negative experience and erosion of trust in the healthcare system. Implementing personalized race-conscious healthcare rather than race-based medicine is essential to improving patient-doctor relationships by building trust and eliminating unnecessary medical practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Medical Association","volume":"117 3","pages":"Pages 201-207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002796842500032X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Race-based medicine was initially established to risk-stratify patients using algorithms based on biological similarities. This generalized form of medicine resulted in harmful practices and health inequities. Although race-based medicine has received increasing attention as a harmful practice contributing to structural and systemic racism in medicine, the individual patient perspective remains relatively under-studied, particularly in obstetrics. This qualitative case study uses a situated lens to explore the individual experience and perspective of race-based medicine in perinatal care.
Methods
This was an institutional review board approved qualitative study utilizing semi-structured interviews as part of a larger study investigating the birth experiences of military beneficiaries. The interview was recorded and transcribed with data inductively analyzed using narrative analysis with positioning theory to identify positions and lived experiences during the individual's care experiences.
Results
Narrative analysis yielded the following themes: (1) self-identity; (2) reinforcing racial sensitivity; (3) health individualization; (4) internal conflict with external perception and honesty; (5) trust and respect; (6) resisting negative influence and press/stories; (7) intellectualization; and (8) fear vs. empowerment for personalized birth wishes. Each theme represented valid concerns patients may experience with race-based medicine in a healthcare setting.
Conclusions
The application of race-based medicine during prenatal care may harm the relationship between pregnant individuals and clinicians, leading to an overall negative experience and erosion of trust in the healthcare system. Implementing personalized race-conscious healthcare rather than race-based medicine is essential to improving patient-doctor relationships by building trust and eliminating unnecessary medical practices.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the National Medical Association, the official journal of the National Medical Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to address medical care disparities of persons of African descent.
The Journal of the National Medical Association is focused on specialized clinical research activities related to the health problems of African Americans and other minority groups. Special emphasis is placed on the application of medical science to improve the healthcare of underserved populations both in the United States and abroad. The Journal has the following objectives: (1) to expand the base of original peer-reviewed literature and the quality of that research on the topic of minority health; (2) to provide greater dissemination of this research; (3) to offer appropriate and timely recognition of the significant contributions of physicians who serve these populations; and (4) to promote engagement by member and non-member physicians in the overall goals and objectives of the National Medical Association.