Detecting sources of anger in automated driving: driving-related and external factor.

IF 1.9 Q3 ERGONOMICS
Frontiers in neuroergonomics Pub Date : 2025-05-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1548861
Jordan Maillant, Christophe Jallais, Stéphanie Dabic
{"title":"Detecting sources of anger in automated driving: driving-related and external factor.","authors":"Jordan Maillant, Christophe Jallais, Stéphanie Dabic","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1548861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anger while driving is often provoked by on-road events like sudden cut-offs but can also arise from external factors, such as rumination of negative thoughts. With the rise of autonomous vehicles, drivers are expected to engage more in non-driving activities, potentially increasing the occurrence of anger stemming from non-driving-related sources. Given the well-established link between anger and aggressive driving behaviors, it is crucial to detect and understand the various origins of anger in autonomous driving contexts to enhance road safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigates whether physiological (cardiac and respiratory activities) and ocular indicators of anger vary depending on its source (driving-related or external) in a simulated autonomous driving environment. Using a combination of autobiographical recall (AR) for external anger induction and driving-related scenarios (DS), 47 participants were exposed to anger and/or neutral conditions across four groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that combined anger induction (incorporating both external and driving-related sources) led to higher subjective anger ratings, more heart rate variability. However, when examined separately, individual anger sources did not produce significant differences in physiological responses and ocular strategies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results suggest that the combination of anger-inducing events, rather than the specific source, is more likely to provoke a heightened state of anger. Consequently, future research should employ combined induction methods to effectively elicit anger in experimental settings. Moreover, anger detection systems should focus on the overall interplay of contributing factors rather than distinguishing between individual sources, as it is this cumulative dynamic that more effectively triggers significant anger responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":517413,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroergonomics","volume":"6 ","pages":"1548861"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1548861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Anger while driving is often provoked by on-road events like sudden cut-offs but can also arise from external factors, such as rumination of negative thoughts. With the rise of autonomous vehicles, drivers are expected to engage more in non-driving activities, potentially increasing the occurrence of anger stemming from non-driving-related sources. Given the well-established link between anger and aggressive driving behaviors, it is crucial to detect and understand the various origins of anger in autonomous driving contexts to enhance road safety.

Methods: This study investigates whether physiological (cardiac and respiratory activities) and ocular indicators of anger vary depending on its source (driving-related or external) in a simulated autonomous driving environment. Using a combination of autobiographical recall (AR) for external anger induction and driving-related scenarios (DS), 47 participants were exposed to anger and/or neutral conditions across four groups.

Results: The results revealed that combined anger induction (incorporating both external and driving-related sources) led to higher subjective anger ratings, more heart rate variability. However, when examined separately, individual anger sources did not produce significant differences in physiological responses and ocular strategies.

Discussion: These results suggest that the combination of anger-inducing events, rather than the specific source, is more likely to provoke a heightened state of anger. Consequently, future research should employ combined induction methods to effectively elicit anger in experimental settings. Moreover, anger detection systems should focus on the overall interplay of contributing factors rather than distinguishing between individual sources, as it is this cumulative dynamic that more effectively triggers significant anger responses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自动驾驶中愤怒源的检测:驾驶相关因素和外部因素。
导读:开车时的愤怒通常是由道路上的事件引起的,比如突然的交通堵塞,但也可能是由外部因素引起的,比如消极思想的沉思。随着自动驾驶汽车的普及,司机将更多地从事非驾驶活动,因此,因非驾驶相关原因引发的愤怒情绪可能会增加。鉴于愤怒和攻击性驾驶行为之间存在着明确的联系,检测和理解自动驾驶环境中愤怒的各种来源对于提高道路安全至关重要。方法:本研究探讨了在模拟自动驾驶环境中,愤怒的生理(心脏和呼吸活动)和眼部指标是否会因其来源(驾驶相关或外部)而发生变化。采用自传式回忆(AR)和驾驶相关情景(DS)相结合的方法,将47名参与者分为四组,分别暴露在愤怒和/或中性条件下。结果:结果显示,综合愤怒诱导(包括外部和驾驶相关的来源)导致更高的主观愤怒评级,更大的心率变异性。然而,当单独检查时,个体愤怒源在生理反应和眼部策略上没有显著差异。讨论:这些结果表明,引起愤怒的事件的组合,而不是特定的来源,更有可能引发愤怒的高度状态。因此,未来的研究应该采用联合诱导方法来有效地在实验环境中引发愤怒。此外,愤怒检测系统应该关注促成因素的整体相互作用,而不是区分单个来源,因为正是这种累积的动态更有效地引发了显著的愤怒反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信