Immediate breast reconstruction surgery for breast cancer: current status and future directions.

IF 2.9
Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1007/s12282-025-01723-5
Tadahiko Shien, Hiroko Nogi, Akiko Ogiya, Makoto Ishitobi, Chikako Yamauchi, Ayaka Shimo, Kazutaka Narui, Naomi Nagura, Hirohito Seki, Kaori Terata, Miho Saiga, Tatsuya Uchida, Shinsuke Sasada, Teruhisa Sakurai, Naoki Niikura, Hiroki Mori
{"title":"Immediate breast reconstruction surgery for breast cancer: current status and future directions.","authors":"Tadahiko Shien, Hiroko Nogi, Akiko Ogiya, Makoto Ishitobi, Chikako Yamauchi, Ayaka Shimo, Kazutaka Narui, Naomi Nagura, Hirohito Seki, Kaori Terata, Miho Saiga, Tatsuya Uchida, Shinsuke Sasada, Teruhisa Sakurai, Naoki Niikura, Hiroki Mori","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01723-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has become increasingly recognized in Japan as an important component of breast cancer care, improving patients' quality of life after mastectomy. While the adoption of IBR is growing, the reconstruction rate in Japan remains lower than in Western countries. To clarify the current practice and challenges, the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) conducted a nationwide survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive web-based questionnaire survey among all JBCS-certified institutions between December 2020 and February 2021. The survey assessed institutional capabilities, surgical techniques, decision-making criteria for BR, and the integration of adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 429 institutions responded, with 72.5% offering BR and 61.7% capable of providing immediate reconstruction. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) was performed at 73.7% of institutions offering reconstruction. Multidisciplinary conferences with plastic surgeons were held at 70.5% of institutions. Approximately 30% of institutions discontinued IBR if sentinel lymph node metastases were detected intraoperatively, and 62.8% avoided recommending IBR for patients likely to require postoperative radiation therapy. In 94% of institutions, BR did not cause delays in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, 15% of institutions modified their radiation therapy approach in reconstructed patients. Additionally, 27% of physicians still believed that BR could negatively affect prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survey confirmed that IBR is widely performed and feasible in Japan. However, institutional differences, limited access to plastic surgeons, and persistent misconceptions remain significant barriers. Strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration and establishing standardized guidelines will help improve BR rates and patient outcomes in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":520574,"journal":{"name":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":" ","pages":"630-637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01723-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has become increasingly recognized in Japan as an important component of breast cancer care, improving patients' quality of life after mastectomy. While the adoption of IBR is growing, the reconstruction rate in Japan remains lower than in Western countries. To clarify the current practice and challenges, the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) conducted a nationwide survey.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive web-based questionnaire survey among all JBCS-certified institutions between December 2020 and February 2021. The survey assessed institutional capabilities, surgical techniques, decision-making criteria for BR, and the integration of adjuvant therapy.

Results: A total of 429 institutions responded, with 72.5% offering BR and 61.7% capable of providing immediate reconstruction. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) was performed at 73.7% of institutions offering reconstruction. Multidisciplinary conferences with plastic surgeons were held at 70.5% of institutions. Approximately 30% of institutions discontinued IBR if sentinel lymph node metastases were detected intraoperatively, and 62.8% avoided recommending IBR for patients likely to require postoperative radiation therapy. In 94% of institutions, BR did not cause delays in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. However, 15% of institutions modified their radiation therapy approach in reconstructed patients. Additionally, 27% of physicians still believed that BR could negatively affect prognosis.

Conclusions: The survey confirmed that IBR is widely performed and feasible in Japan. However, institutional differences, limited access to plastic surgeons, and persistent misconceptions remain significant barriers. Strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration and establishing standardized guidelines will help improve BR rates and patient outcomes in Japan.

乳腺癌即刻乳房重建手术:现状及未来发展方向。
背景:在日本,即刻乳房重建(IBR)越来越被认为是乳腺癌治疗的重要组成部分,可以提高乳房切除术后患者的生活质量。虽然IBR的采用正在增加,但日本的重建率仍然低于西方国家。为了弄清目前的做法和挑战,日本乳腺癌协会(JBCS)进行了一项全国性的调查。方法:我们于2020年12月至2021年2月对所有jbcs认证机构进行了全面的网络问卷调查。该调查评估了机构能力、手术技术、BR的决策标准和辅助治疗的整合。结果:共有429家机构回应,其中72.5%的机构提供BR, 61.7%的机构能够提供即时重建。保留乳头乳房切除术(NSM)在73.7%的机构提供重建。70.5%的机构举行了与整形外科医生的多学科会议。如果术中发现前哨淋巴结转移,大约30%的机构停止IBR, 62.8%的机构避免推荐可能需要术后放疗的患者进行IBR。在94%的机构中,BR没有导致辅助化疗的延迟。然而,15%的机构修改了重建患者的放射治疗方法。此外,27%的医生仍然认为BR会对预后产生负面影响。结论:本调查证实IBR在日本是广泛实施和可行的。然而,制度差异、接受整形手术的机会有限以及持续存在的误解仍然是重大障碍。加强多学科合作和建立标准化指南将有助于提高日本的BR率和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信