Wafaa El-Ghaly , Taha El Kamli , Ange Melisse Ariane Gongbe , Lamia Zaari Lambarki , Maha El Hamdani , Fatima-ezzahra Lahkak , Najib Al Idrissi , Adnane Benmoussa , Lhousaine Balouch , Fadil Bakkali , Taoufiq Saffaj , Fayssal Jhilal
{"title":"Development and validation of a quantitative UHPLC-HRMS bioanalytical method for equine anti-doping control","authors":"Wafaa El-Ghaly , Taha El Kamli , Ange Melisse Ariane Gongbe , Lamia Zaari Lambarki , Maha El Hamdani , Fatima-ezzahra Lahkak , Najib Al Idrissi , Adnane Benmoussa , Lhousaine Balouch , Fadil Bakkali , Taoufiq Saffaj , Fayssal Jhilal","doi":"10.1016/j.vascn.2025.107759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The quantification of banned substances in equine antidoping control, especially in racehorse urine, necessitates robust analytical methods with high detection levels due to the extremely low concentrations of the target substances and the significant impact of minor variations on doping test results. Reliable quantification is important for substances near regulatory thresholds, which, if exceeded, are prohibited.</div><div>This study presents the development and validation of a bioanalytical UHPLC-HRMS method for quantifying doping substances in equine urine, including diazepam and acepromazine with a regulatory limit level of 10 ng.mL<sup>−1</sup> (validated at 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 ng.mL<sup>−1</sup>); ketoprofen, flunixin, and caffeine with a permissible limit of 100 ng.mL<sup>−1</sup> (validated at 60, 80, 100, 120, and 140 ng.mL<sup>−1</sup>); and meloxicam and lidocaine with a detection threshold of 25 ng.mL<sup>−1</sup> (validated at 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 ng.mL<sup>−1</sup>) using the accuracy profile. Different β values were applied to determine the proportion of future measurements that will fall within predefined acceptance limits, set at ±30 % (for a biological matrix). Method validation was carefully carried out and rigorously demonstrated in compliance with the French Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Techniques (SFSTP) commission in compliance with the ISO 17025 standard.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 107759"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871925001790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The quantification of banned substances in equine antidoping control, especially in racehorse urine, necessitates robust analytical methods with high detection levels due to the extremely low concentrations of the target substances and the significant impact of minor variations on doping test results. Reliable quantification is important for substances near regulatory thresholds, which, if exceeded, are prohibited.
This study presents the development and validation of a bioanalytical UHPLC-HRMS method for quantifying doping substances in equine urine, including diazepam and acepromazine with a regulatory limit level of 10 ng.mL−1 (validated at 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 ng.mL−1); ketoprofen, flunixin, and caffeine with a permissible limit of 100 ng.mL−1 (validated at 60, 80, 100, 120, and 140 ng.mL−1); and meloxicam and lidocaine with a detection threshold of 25 ng.mL−1 (validated at 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 ng.mL−1) using the accuracy profile. Different β values were applied to determine the proportion of future measurements that will fall within predefined acceptance limits, set at ±30 % (for a biological matrix). Method validation was carefully carried out and rigorously demonstrated in compliance with the French Society of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Techniques (SFSTP) commission in compliance with the ISO 17025 standard.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods publishes original articles on current methods of investigation used in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacology and toxicology are defined in the broadest sense, referring to actions of drugs and chemicals on all living systems. With its international editorial board and noted contributors, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods is the leading journal devoted exclusively to experimental procedures used by pharmacologists and toxicologists.