A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Research on Barriers and Facilitators to Home Hemodialysis.

Áine Earley, Sinéad Lydon, Rachael C Walker, Lisa Gannon, Donal Reddan, Lorna Durack, Paul O'Connor
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Research on Barriers and Facilitators to Home Hemodialysis.","authors":"Áine Earley, Sinéad Lydon, Rachael C Walker, Lisa Gannon, Donal Reddan, Lorna Durack, Paul O'Connor","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The growing prevalence of chronic kidney disease has led to an increased demand for kidney replacement therapies. Although a kidney transplant is the preferred treatment for patients, many patients require dialysis temporarily before receiving a transplant or are unsuitable transplant candidates requiring long-term dialysis. Home hemodialysis (home HD) is cost-effective and associated with improved patient outcomes; however, its adoption remains low. There is a need to understand the factors that may support or hinder the use of home HD. Accordingly, a systematic review of the qualitative literature was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to home HD for patients, their carers/family, and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was carried out following ENTREQ guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted on Medline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO. The COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were used to collate the barriers and enablers identified within the papers through deductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Within the capability component of the COM-B model, lack of knowledge of home HD was identified as a barrier by healthcare professionals and patients. Within the opportunity component, the suitability of patients' homes (e.g., home modifications) and the healthcare system was identified as barriers to home HD. Fostering an environment of support and community was seen as a facilitator of home HD. Within the motivation component of the model, a lack of confidence and reluctance of patients to burden their family members with the responsibility of treatment were perceived as barriers. Improvements in the quality of life for the person receiving home HD were regarded as a motivator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To encourage widespread home HD use, understanding its barriers and facilitators for patients and the healthcare system is key to developing and implementing effective interventions to increase uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The growing prevalence of chronic kidney disease has led to an increased demand for kidney replacement therapies. Although a kidney transplant is the preferred treatment for patients, many patients require dialysis temporarily before receiving a transplant or are unsuitable transplant candidates requiring long-term dialysis. Home hemodialysis (home HD) is cost-effective and associated with improved patient outcomes; however, its adoption remains low. There is a need to understand the factors that may support or hinder the use of home HD. Accordingly, a systematic review of the qualitative literature was conducted to identify barriers and facilitators to home HD for patients, their carers/family, and healthcare professionals.

Methods: This systematic review was carried out following ENTREQ guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted on Medline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO. The COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) were used to collate the barriers and enablers identified within the papers through deductive content analysis.

Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Within the capability component of the COM-B model, lack of knowledge of home HD was identified as a barrier by healthcare professionals and patients. Within the opportunity component, the suitability of patients' homes (e.g., home modifications) and the healthcare system was identified as barriers to home HD. Fostering an environment of support and community was seen as a facilitator of home HD. Within the motivation component of the model, a lack of confidence and reluctance of patients to burden their family members with the responsibility of treatment were perceived as barriers. Improvements in the quality of life for the person receiving home HD were regarded as a motivator.

Conclusion: To encourage widespread home HD use, understanding its barriers and facilitators for patients and the healthcare system is key to developing and implementing effective interventions to increase uptake.

家庭血液透析障碍与促进因素定性研究的系统综述。
导论:慢性肾脏疾病的日益流行导致对肾脏替代疗法的需求增加。虽然肾移植是患者的首选治疗方法,但许多患者在接受移植前需要暂时透析,或者不适合移植候选人需要长期透析。家庭血液透析(Home HD)具有成本效益,并可改善患者预后;然而,它的采用率仍然很低。有必要了解可能支持或阻碍家庭高清电视使用的因素。因此,对定性文献进行了系统回顾,以确定患者,其护理人员/家庭和医疗保健专业人员家庭HD的障碍和促进因素。方法:本系统综述遵循ENTREQ指南进行。电子检索在Medline (OVID)、EMBASE、CINAHL (EBSCO)和PsycINFO上进行。COM-B和理论领域框架(TDF)被用来通过演绎内容分析来整理论文中确定的障碍和促进因素。结果:13项研究符合纳入标准。在COM-B模型的能力组成部分中,医疗保健专业人员和患者认为缺乏家庭HD知识是一个障碍。在机会因素中,患者家庭的适宜性(例如,家庭改造)和医疗保健系统被确定为家庭HD的障碍。营造一个支持和社区的环境被视为家庭房屋署的推手。在模型的动机部分,缺乏信心和病人不愿意负担他们的家庭成员与治疗的责任被认为是障碍。接受家庭高清服务的人的生活质量得到改善被认为是一个激励因素。结论:为了促进家庭HD的广泛使用,了解其对患者和医疗保健系统的障碍和促进因素是制定和实施有效干预措施以提高使用率的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信