Smooth Muscle Relaxants for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Systematic Review.

Emily M Snyder, Gopika Krishna, Lauren B Zapata, Antoinette T Nguyen, Maura K Whiteman, Kathryn M Curtis
{"title":"Smooth Muscle Relaxants for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Emily M Snyder, Gopika Krishna, Lauren B Zapata, Antoinette T Nguyen, Maura K Whiteman, Kathryn M Curtis","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically review evidence on whether medications with smooth muscle relaxant properties improve patient and provider outcomes for intrauterine device (IUD) placement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We searched multiple databases through August 2022 for randomized clinical trials assessing smooth muscle relaxants for IUD placement. Primary outcomes were pain experienced with IUD placement, provider ease of placement, need for adjunctive placement measures, placement success, patient satisfaction with procedure, medication side effects occurring before clinic discharge, and adverse events occurring before clinic discharge. We extracted data from included articles, assessed risk of bias for each trial, narratively summarized results, and determined certainty of evidence for all outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five trials met inclusion criteria; four trials had low risk of bias and one had moderate risk. Two trials of topical nitroprusside gel or nitroglycerin ointment found no differences in patient pain, provider ease of placement, patient satisfaction, placement success, side effects, or adverse events. One trial suggested that drotaverine plus mefenamic acid reduced patient pain but did not improve placement success. Two trials suggested that isonicotinic acid hydrazide reduced patient pain, improved provider ease of placement and patient satisfaction, reduced need for analgesia and for cervical dilation (in one trial) and did not increase side effects; neither trial reported improved placement success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence on smooth muscle relaxants for IUD placement remains sparse with inconsistent findings across specific medications. Certainty of evidence for all outcomes was low for topical nitroprusside gel and nitroglycerin ointment, very low for drotaverine plus mefenamic acid, and mostly high for isonicotinic acid hydrazide.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Before IUD placement, healthcare providers can counsel patients on the potential for pain during placement and options for pain management. However, more evidence is needed on specific smooth muscle relaxants to determine their effectiveness as an intervention for IUD placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":" ","pages":"110971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically review evidence on whether medications with smooth muscle relaxant properties improve patient and provider outcomes for intrauterine device (IUD) placement.

Study design: We searched multiple databases through August 2022 for randomized clinical trials assessing smooth muscle relaxants for IUD placement. Primary outcomes were pain experienced with IUD placement, provider ease of placement, need for adjunctive placement measures, placement success, patient satisfaction with procedure, medication side effects occurring before clinic discharge, and adverse events occurring before clinic discharge. We extracted data from included articles, assessed risk of bias for each trial, narratively summarized results, and determined certainty of evidence for all outcomes.

Results: Five trials met inclusion criteria; four trials had low risk of bias and one had moderate risk. Two trials of topical nitroprusside gel or nitroglycerin ointment found no differences in patient pain, provider ease of placement, patient satisfaction, placement success, side effects, or adverse events. One trial suggested that drotaverine plus mefenamic acid reduced patient pain but did not improve placement success. Two trials suggested that isonicotinic acid hydrazide reduced patient pain, improved provider ease of placement and patient satisfaction, reduced need for analgesia and for cervical dilation (in one trial) and did not increase side effects; neither trial reported improved placement success.

Conclusions: Evidence on smooth muscle relaxants for IUD placement remains sparse with inconsistent findings across specific medications. Certainty of evidence for all outcomes was low for topical nitroprusside gel and nitroglycerin ointment, very low for drotaverine plus mefenamic acid, and mostly high for isonicotinic acid hydrazide.

Implications: Before IUD placement, healthcare providers can counsel patients on the potential for pain during placement and options for pain management. However, more evidence is needed on specific smooth muscle relaxants to determine their effectiveness as an intervention for IUD placement.

平滑肌松弛剂用于宫内节育器放置:系统回顾。
目的:系统回顾具有平滑肌松弛剂特性的药物是否能改善放置宫内节育器(IUD)的患者和提供者的结果。研究设计:我们检索了截至2022年8月的多个数据库,以评估平滑肌松弛剂用于宫内节育器放置的随机临床试验。主要结局是放置宫内节育器的疼痛经历、提供者放置的容易程度、辅助放置措施的需要、放置成功、患者对手术的满意度、出院前发生的药物副作用和出院前发生的不良事件。我们从纳入的文章中提取数据,评估每个试验的偏倚风险,叙述总结结果,并确定所有结果的证据确定性。结果:5项试验符合纳入标准;4项试验具有低偏倚风险,1项具有中等偏倚风险。两项局部硝普塞凝胶或硝酸甘油软膏的试验发现,在患者疼痛、提供者放置的容易程度、患者满意度、放置成功、副作用或不良事件方面没有差异。一项试验表明,氯他弗林加甲氧胺酸减轻了患者的疼痛,但没有提高放置成功率。两项试验表明异烟酸肼减轻了患者疼痛,提高了提供者放置的便利性和患者满意度,减少了镇痛和宫颈扩张的需要(一项试验),并且没有增加副作用;两项试验均未报告提高安置成功率。结论:关于平滑肌松弛剂用于放置宫内节育器的证据仍然很少,在特定药物方面的发现不一致。所有结果的证据确定性对于外用硝普赛凝胶和硝酸甘油软膏来说都很低,对于氯弗林加甲氧胺酸来说非常低,而对于异烟酸肼来说几乎是高的。意义:在放置宫内节育器之前,医疗保健提供者可以就放置期间疼痛的可能性和疼痛管理的选择向患者提供咨询。然而,需要更多的证据来确定特定的平滑肌松弛剂作为宫内节育器放置干预的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信